Why I Moved This Blog From the Observer

by Philip Weiss on June 9, 2007 · 16 comments

Speaking of Norm Finkelstein, here is the story of how my blog ended up here, and off the Observer site. And yes, it’s a form of censorship; these views will not be underwritten in the mainstream…

Related posts:

  1. My Brand New Blog
  2. If you’re going to be vicious to Richard Witty, please go find your own blog
  3. Peter Kaplan leaves ‘the Observer’
  4. Israeli Blogger Reports on Settler ‘Goons’ in Hebron. His Blog Gets ‘Locked’ Down
  5. Where This Blog Is Headed, Knock Wood

{ 16 comments }

1 David June 9, 2007 at 11:40 am

That AmCon article is a nice piece of writing.

2 pcol June 9, 2007 at 1:08 pm

Expressing yourself is the best revenge. Keep up the good work.

3 bill Pearlman June 9, 2007 at 1:37 pm

Phil, do you want some cheese with that "whine".

4 Qwerty June 9, 2007 at 2:00 pm

Bill Pearlman is a fine example of how the stifling of free speech grows like a cancer in this country supported by the media, political and intellectual jackboots.

5 Everett Thomas June 9, 2007 at 2:16 pm

More proof of censorship in America:

Talking about the Niggers. Imus lost his job over nothing.

Keep up the good works Mr. Weiss. You are a hero.

6 Richard Witty June 9, 2007 at 6:43 pm

Some on the left (or right) are similarly hateful in their comments and willingness to assault.

I would take your former editor's comments seriously about getting cornered into an issue that can be a career cul-de-sac, if not getting overly fixated in reaction.

Nothing about issues of Israel or "Israeli lobby" is simple, as in good-bad.

There is no position that you could take that would not be proven WRONG in a couple years, and by wrong I mean innaccurate.

Even AIPAC is diverse. Even Alan Dershowitz.

This is adult life.

"These views will not be reported in the mainstream", is an example of you getting into the cul-de-sac.

They ARE reported in the mainstream. Have you yourself not been published on the Israeli lobby a dozen times?

7 Gene Machina June 10, 2007 at 12:03 am

Ricard Witty, if the pro-Israel lobby in this country didn't try to suppress views critical of Israel, Mearsheimer and Walt wouldn't have had to go to the London Review of Books to find a publisher for their paper on the Israel lobby. An old journalist friend once told me that when he was outspokenly critical of Israel at a dinner party he was told by another guest that if he ever repeated his remarks in print he'd never have another book published in this country. From where I sit such threats are real and disturbing. Furhermore, they are profoundly anti-American, which apparently is fine with the people making such threats because America isn't their first love anyway.

8 Richard Witty June 10, 2007 at 7:10 am

Except that there are publishers that will publish material critical of Israel.

And, if one can't find an external publisher, one can self-publish.

Material critical of Israel receives varied reviews.

From the publications I read, I remember Finkelstein also asking for external comment in support of his tenure. If he wanted no external comment, he would have similarly lied low.

You have to be VERY careful to then not silence those that support Israel, in your opposition to those that you perceive as stifling criticism of Israel.

It does happen. Its happened to me abusively. You wouldn't believe the names that I've been called and threatened by so-called protectors of democracy and free expression.

(I also have a somewhat "reactionary" streak. When I am among xenophobic Zionists, I tend to criticize Israel. When I am among dogmatic leftists, I tend to criticize demonization of Israel.)

9 bill Pearlman June 10, 2007 at 7:32 am

Gene my friend, if the Zionist web spreads so far and wide riddle me this. How come the esteemed professors have a book deal and I can't seem to get away from Jimmy Carters smiling mug.

10 cooper June 10, 2007 at 8:24 am

A mention of Solzhenitsyn's latest work seems apropos. The world's greatest living writer, a Nobel Prize winner, cannot find a New York City publisher willing to translate and produce his most likely last (and possibly finest) work.

Surely Russian translaters have not disappeared since "Gulag Archipelago". Solzhenitsyn's subject matter- Jewish-Russian relations over the 200 years between 1795-2005- just may have something to do with this shocking de facto censorship…

11 phil weiss June 10, 2007 at 8:29 am

Bill, I take your point re Carter and Walt and Mearsheimer. Things are slowly changing. The American conversation is changing. Maybe some day I'll get a book contract! Phil

12 Robert June 10, 2007 at 11:24 am

"Maybe some day I'll get a book contract! Phil"

We figured as much.

13 Richard Silverstein June 11, 2007 at 5:42 am

Good stuff, Philip. I didn't know about much of that Observer history. You're lucky to have had a Kaplan in yr life though too bad he couldn't support you in the way you really needed him to when you needed him to.

14 Donald June 11, 2007 at 2:35 pm

We all know that Israeli and South African human rights activists have been comparing Israel's policies to apartheid for years. It took Jimmy Carter–a former American President who brokered the peace agreement between Israel and Egypt–to bring this comparison to mainstream America and he was vilified for it. Things may be changing, but we've got a very long way to go.

15 apter June 12, 2007 at 11:45 pm

Weiss and Finkelstein two peas in a pod.

They are both losers and whiners.

Each thinks they can attack the Jewish community but that Jews don't a right to fight back.

They are wrong.

Just a couple of spoiled brats.

16 Montag June 13, 2007 at 3:41 pm

Ironically, I found your blog from Rossner's mention in his Ha'aretz column about your American Conservative article.

As for a book, didn't they try to PULP one of Michael Moore's as "unpublishable," after they had published it? Talk about tough critics!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Finkelstein Denied Tenure at DePaul

Next post: Speaking as a Jew Against Dual Loyalty