Yesterday Manny Ramirez said it wasn’t the end of the world if the Red Sox don’t beat Cleveland. Shocking. Tucker Carlson said on his show that he thinks Manny is smoking pot. Last night Ramirez went two for four (though he was boneheaded on the basepaths) and once again demonstrated what an amazing hitter he is. I remember what Lincoln supposedly said when they told him U.S. Grant had a drinking problem. "Find out what brand he drinks and send a case to the other generals…"
Related posts:
{ 4 comments }
I'm not a huge baseball fan, but I played the game hard in my youth and get drawn into the fray most every October due to the ferocity of the competition. Ramirez exemplifies the same traits as the legendary Babe Ruth– incredible upper body strength, lightning quick reflexes, amazing self confidence and swagger, the eyesight of an eagle, and a sixth sense about where every pitch is going. He can hit anything in the strike zone out of the park, and he will not swing at a ball that's an inch out of the zone, even with the count at two strikes. With his HR's and RBI's doing most of the damage, he doesn't have to run much. He's a pitcher's worst nightmare.
Here is a must read for baseball unfans.
In a sense I make my living reading the newspapers and for me the world's best columnist on international affairs is an "American in Paris" named William Pfaff. His byline has appeared in the Paris Trib for many years with occasional appearances in such prestigious venues as The New York Review of Books.
He is the columnist's columnist. He has had an enormous influence on me and my work and I would describe him as the "anti-Thomas Friedman".
He has just written about the best thing that I have read yet about the situation Israel finds itself today.
Below I've pasted an abstract I've made of the full article.
****
William Pfaff; A Question for Israelis
The question is this: suppose that Israel is given all that its government seems to want. No Palestinian state, Israel continues colonization, annexing more of the Palestinian territories, or even all of them. What then? What will happen to the Palestinians in the years ahead? What would the land of Israel, and what now are the Palestinian territories, look like in 50 years?(…)
The question is what is to be done now. Forming a new state for the Palestinians is the solution that is being attempted. This why Condoleezza Rice has made seven visits to Israel this year. She wishes to bring the parties to a meeting in Annapolis, Maryland, next month, to advance the creation of such a state. It is hard to expect much to result from this initiative, since Israel gives no evidence of wishing to see progress in the matter. The government’s announcement of still another seizure of Palestinian land in Jerusalem a few days before Secretary Rice’s arrival seemed a deliberate slap in her face.
One must ask the Israeli government the following question. Suppose, as is probable, that no American administration, now or later, puts any obstacle in the way of whatever you want to do. Suppose there were no effective international pressures on you to stop colonization and land seizures. Suppose that no Palestinian state is created. What are you going to do about the Palestinians?(…)
American opinion is shifting. The Walt-Mearsheimer book had had an effect. The deliberate Israeli sinking of the USS Liberty in 1967 has been taken up again in the mainstream press. War in Iraq and the possibility of attack on Iran has increased popular concern about Israeli influence on American policy. Israeli human rights groups have denounced the treatment of the Palestinians, and recently have accused the Israeli authorities of trying to force Palestinians needing emergency medical help in Israeli hospitals to collaborate with Israel’s security services as a condition for treatment.
How long can this continue, even as a purely practical problem of physical control of a hostile population? The Palestinian population continues to grow more rapidly than Israel’s, and the average age grow younger, producing cohorts of young people who are politically radicalized, ready to turn again to violence to be free of these conditions of life. There are certain to be new Palestinian uprisings.
In international law, Israel is responsible for these people. What methods of permanent control does it envisage? There are some in Israel who hope their misery will force the Palestinians to abandon the territories. But to go where? In what conditions, and under what compulsion?(…)
I am not asking this for polemical purposes. I am asking a practical question. What is Israel going to do with these people? The problem exists, and however convenient to ignore today, it will have to answered.
Read it all at:
http://www.williampfaff.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=262
manny had been kind of quiet all year. he just came back from an injury and has been amazing. he's carrying the team, at least in terms of hitting.
I'm a fan but not a die-hard member of the Red Sox nation. I think Manny's antics fall on the harmless and even endearing side of the spectrum — and they are all the more forgiveable given his production. He's the anti-Bonds: not taking himself (or the game) too seriously, though he's arguably the most valuable player on the team after Beckett. He's actually a joy to watch in comparison to these poker-faced, no-bullshit types.
Comments on this entry are closed.