There is a direct connection between the unstated and off budget costs of this war and the downward swirl of American prosperity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSkIpSDMIOA

Its still murder of civilians. Collective punishment. An attempt to use force to get one's collective will.

There are always reasons that people do the fucked up things that they do. And it is useful to understand those reasons (if they are reasonable) to reconcile.

But, if the attempt is NOT to reconcile, but to forcefully remove, then it is hatred, pretending to be resistance.

Who can say as much for any other candidate, not to mention the current administration? If we want our country back we need to take the losses of "security" that our Big Brother government offers us, take some personal responsibility, and get Ron Paul in office.

Freedom comes with a price. Which is more gruesome, the slashing in size of our obese government, or the slaughter of our young men and women in endless wars on terrorism?

Not only is Zionist racism, but it is terroism.

Proportionate response is jus in bello, and Palestinians are nowhere near that, but it is worthwhile to remember that John Brown had slavers hacked to pieces, and he is considered a hero.

Slavers are a good deal less evil than Zionists, for slavers considered Africans a valuable commodity while Zionists have for the most part treated Palestinians vermin infesting the country that Zionists want all for themselves.

Until 1940, opposition to foreign intervention was mainstream opinion in the U.S. Now permanent foreign occupations and a worldwide network of military bases are seen as a core mission of the Defense [sic] Department (formerly, the War Department). NATO's disastrous expansion campaign is not even a subject of debate.

As Ron Paul has emphasized, cutting off U.S. aid to Israel would be only a small component of a major rollback in U.S. interventionism, and is no way targeted at Israel in particular. Sadly, this too is said to be extreme. I regard Ron Paul as the only sane doctor in an asylum taken over by crazed, armed inmates.

The world cannot stand the destabalization of an abrupt renunciation of treaties (the law of the land, with more authority than legislation), and other agreements in the world.

Gradually, with care to replace with alternative stable systems, maybe, but abruptly that is just radicalism.

It represents as much a destabilization as the US invasion of Iraq does.

Further, his selective interpretation of the constitution is sickening. The responsibility of the president is to execute the laws of the land, that Congress legislated, NOT to pretend that the president has the authority to not execute legislation.

If he wants to work to change the law of the land, Congress is the place. And, as his views are dysfunctional (and prospectively bankrupting the nation), unlikely to get much traction.

But, the same was said about the republicans borrow (tax the future) and spend program, utterly dysfunctional.

Could Witty be attempting to depict Paul as a fringe candidate because he wants to turn off the money spigot to Israel?

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/01/ron-paul-supporters-attack-islamophobe.html

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2007/07/scamming-americans-robbing-palestinians.html

http://bridgenews.org/bridge_news/issue8backup/martillo