Comments on: Brzezinski Explains Why He (and Gazillions of Others) Are for Obama

By: the Sword of Gideon

the Sword of Gideon — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

I know that people here look at peanut Jimmy with awe. particularly since he threw in with Hamas. But most Americans don't look back at 1976-80 with great fondness. And Brezinski was an integral part of that. So other than than some elderly villagers in Jedwebne I don't see him moving a lot of hearts and minds

By: Richard Witty

Richard Witty — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

I'm for Obama for two reasons:

1. One is that is open to reviewing past assumptions and methods of approach. I am far more interested in domestic issues than foreign policy, so Brzinski's comments are relevant to me but not primary.

2. The second is that the range of assumptions and methods that Obama is likely to consider include a recognition of the lives of working people, a high bar for policy excellence, a prominent role of community in governance, a reluctance to use force to accomplish ends (but a willingness when it is necessary).

By: Richard Witty

Richard Witty — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

I look at Carter's energy efforts as before its time (actually right on time), and now we desparately have to CATCH UP.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Mickey Kantor, Clinton Advisor: Indianans "Shit", "Worthless White N*rs"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN_nQOHj__s&eurl= more Jews can come
reduce the coherence of the old Anglo Protestant core
reduce their sense of uniqueness....I mean anybody can be a US citizen

By: peters

peters — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Does anyone know why the press is turning on Obama? The story is that he is not electable due to the Rezco,etc, scandal and the Republicans will make mincemeat of him. I don't buy this. The press was for him and now they are not. What's the deal?

By: Charles Keating

Charles Keating — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

They see it as payback for…what?
That's a nuance worth repeating, Ed.

Each one of them constantly exhibits a different blend\style of contempt. Bush is good at that too.

By: Charles Keating

Charles Keating — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Of course nobody beats Chaney.

By: ed.

ed. — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

"surely the payback is plain: the 1924 Immigration Act which limited Jewish immigration."

No doubt that's part of the motive for their hatred. But I think it goes way beyond that. Read this paragraph from Takimag from an article about what motivates the Neocons:
"For them, the Holocaust is the Evil Western World’s apotheosis, the culmination of the crusades, witch burnings, slavery, pogroms, mistreatment of indigenous peoples, etc. Of course, we all agree that this evil event should not happen to this group again. But much more is required."
http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/never_again_nation/
I think they actually have projected the blame for the Holocaust onto Americans and the entire West (even though hundreds of thousands of Americans died putting an end to the Nazis). And they want to use big government to punish average Americans the same way the Jewish Bolsheviks used big government to kill millions of average Russians...and this was BEFORE the Holocaust.

Clearly Jewish ideologues possess a deep racial hatred for nearly all gentiles, and white gentiles in particular. This is a judgment not only on them, but on their cynical gentile collaborators who have internalized Jewish elitism and bigotry. It’s important for Americans to know that this elitist axis HATES Western civilization and HATES average gentile Americans...considers them "white ni**ers," as Cantor put it while yucking it up with Carville and Stephanopoulos, and probably wants to enslave them, or at least put them under the yoke.

Once Americans understand that simple fact, much of what the DC governing class has done to destroy America and enslave it in debt while enriching itself makes perfect sense.