Now it has gone everywhere it seems:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/index.php?s=Yaron+Brook

But here is the transcript of the relevant passage. I usually call it: "Passing(is overtaking English?) O'Reilly on the Right":

http://ariwatch.com/OReillyInterviewsYaronBrook.htm

O’Reilly, like Mr. Brook, was gung-ho about invading Iraq in March 2003, but even he has a problem with Mr. Brook’s “a lot more brutal” – though O’Reilly is more concerned about what the world will think than about the brutality –

O’R: All right, but if you do that, if you throw out the Geneva convention and throw out a lot of these rules of engagement that we have … then you alienate the whole world, you create more enemies, because Al-Jazeera [an Arab news agency – A.W.] and these people, they’re running wild now [they broadcast photos of the mayhem – A.W.], they’d ramp it up tenfold, so, you have to consider the cause and effect do you not?

YB: It’s the opposite, Bill. The weaker we are, the weaker we are portrayed, the more we prosecute soldiers for killing injured insurgents, the stronger the enemy becomes, the more confident they are, the more emboldened they are that they can actually defeat us …

O’R: That might be the micro-view there … but you’re not suggesting, Doctor, that U.S. soldiers execute captured Iraqis are you?

YB: I’m suggesting that we start bringing this war to the civilians, the consequences of this war, to the civilians who are harboring and helping and supporting the insurgents in Fellujah and other places.

O’R: By doing what?

YB: I would like to see the United States turn Fallujah into dust, and tell the Iraqis: If you’re going to continue to support the insurgents you will not have homes, you will not have schools, you will not have mosques …

O’R: But then we’d be Nazis. You know that’s what the Nazis d …

YB: No we wouldn’t be Nazis …

O’R: Well yes we would, [3] let me ask you thi …

YB: We’re the good guys, Bill, here. There’s an enormous difference, we are fighting …

O’R: The Nazis thought they were good guys too. All right, but look, that’s what the Nazis did …

YB: It’s irrelevant what you think you are, the question is what you truly are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaron_Brook

http://jstreet.org/campaigns/thats-offensive-mr-president

1. Hitler claimed falsely that the Sudeten Germans were being denied their rights of self-determination in the new nation of Czechoslovakia. President Edvard Benes and the ruling CNSP protested that there was no truth in those allegations. (In 2002 George W. Bush claimed falsely that Saddam Hussein was developing WMDs. Saddam Hussein protested that those charges were untrue.)

2.The German threatened invasion and annexation unless a German-dominated Sudetenland was created and given substantial autonomy. (The US Administration threatened invasion and occupation unless the Iraqi government handed over all is WMDs and ceased its clandestine program.)

3. The PM of UK, Neville Chamberlain warned the Czech government that there was merit in Hitler's claims and that the Sudetens would have to be given autonomy. (The PM of the UK, Tony Blair warned Saddam that there compelling evidence gathered by British intelligence that Saddam possessed WMDs and he would have to hand them over or face the consequences.)

4. Munich Agreement (September 1938) handed over Sudetenland to the Reich; March 2003 the US military invaded and occupied Iraq.

So, reader, in yet another way we have entered an Orwellian (not Oarwellian) period.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts246.html

Here's the youtube link for the Friedman phallofascistfest:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOF6ZeUvgXs