Lying propaganda. Israel has nothing to do with Western (Greco-Roman-Christian) civilization other than to parasitically draw blood and life-force from it.
Organized Judaism has done nothing but wage war against Western civilization for decades, from Bolshevism to cultural Marxism to Neoconservatism…all of which have systematically eroded Christian and Western consciousness and attempted to replace them with generic, Jewish-written creeds — most of which (not-so-coincidentally) comport to Zionist creeds and place Jews at the top of the nascent caste system.
Western civilization will only survive and again prosper by eradicating not the Muslims, but the Judeofascists. Any Westerner who collaborates with the Judeofascists and their hyper-materialist ideology is the enemy of Western civilization, and should be eradicated with the Judeofascists.

Please consider ending the use of sentences like the following:

"Zionists use their cultural power to tilt the scales of American journalism in favor of Israel."

where you repeat the misleading ambiguity that "Zionists are for Israel."

Which Israel are they for? All possible Israels? No, they're for their own narrow idea of Israel, and even "Greater Israel" as you know.

When you use language like that, it includes the assumption that they are inherently "pro-Israel" when the reality is their warmongering and support of atrocities against the Palestinians is vastly out of line *even with the majority of Israelis*.

Please don't give them that gift, even if it's what they think, it's just not accurate and makes it even more difficult to expose and declaw these hardliners/fanatics who are the tail wagging the dog of Israel.

For point of reference, these Zionists definitely do not support negotiations with Hamas, and are chomping at the bit to see Olmert be brought low for even considering it. 64% of Israelis support direct negotiations with Hamas, sans preconditions, immediately. Yet their government doesn't listen to them.

It's like saying the Neocons over here are pro-America, and they may certainly think so, but do you think so? Most Americans sure don't.

Myth 6: The recent uprising in Tibet was the result of accumulating resentment against Chinese suppression

Truth: Such statement grossly understates the complexity of the socio-political reality in Tibet.
Different groups of Tibetans have very different feelings towards Han Chinese and the Chinese government

Buddhist monks: Before the Communist takeover in 1950, monks / lamas constitutes the privileged class in Tibetan society, owning massive areas of land and a large number of serfs, who, as we discussed before, were treated practically like slaves. The land reform that took place in the 1950s and, more extensively, the 1960s (after the failed military rebellion in 1959) distributed much of the land that was previously owned by the monasteries to the poor serfs and peasant, causing the economic and social power of the monasteries, as well as the wealth of the monks, to shrink. Later in the 1960, during the Cultural Revolution, former peasants and serfs are encouraged to condemn their former “exploitive masters”. Under popular pressure, some were even forced to involve in productive activities – something unthinkable to the monks when Tibet was under Dalai Lama’s feudalist rule. It is therefore fair to say that the resentment among Tibetan lamas against the so-called oppressive Chinese rule has more to do with the loss of economic and political privileges than the loss of religious freedom. Religious activities are monitored closely in Tibet for the close tie between religion and politics – and in turn social stability, as is clear from the recent turmoil – rather than for the suppression of religion itself."

The apologia goes on to say that the Han Chinese are resented by the Tibetans for being "business-savvy," and that the Dalai Lama continues to make unfortunate and inflammatory statements that set the cause of peace back.

Two sides to everything, eh?

"Israel has nothing to do with Western (Greco-Roman-Christian) civilization other than to parasitically draw blood and life-force from it.
Organized Judaism has done nothing but wage war against Western civilization for decades, from Bolshevism to cultural Marxism to Neoconservatism…all of which have systematically eroded Christian and Western consciousness and attempted to replace them with generic, Jewish-written creeds –"

Wasn't Christianity "Jewish written?" Or are you like the Germans described by Milton Mayer in his classic book 'They Thought They Were Free,' who disavowed that Jesus was Jewish?

The ironies don't end with Jewish handwringing about our Western (vilayati)culture being under siege. Your earlier blog about the National Post supporting the election of Rome's neo-Fascist mayor is of a piece with all the other stories of new alliances with Dutch and Danish neo-Nazis. Will research positions at the American Enterprise Institute be offered to these people as well?

"Then I said, "Could you tell, if you saw Jesus, that he was a Jew, Herr Simon?

"I think so," he said, "if he was a Jew. But was he a Jew? If he was, why did the Jews kill him? Can you tell me that?" (They Thought They Were Free (1955), pp 136-137.

Do you think Jesus sought to extend/change the Jewish definition of "neighbor?"

No on first sight at the AEI it seems to be more about Americanism as the Forth Religion. The fascist enemy is always out there, as Michael Ledeen knows.

Political Philosopy: link to tinyurl.com

On Top Ledeen:
link to tinyurl.com

And in General Political and Social Policy: link to tinyurl.com

We find an interesting item:
Americanism. The Fourth Great Western Religion, By David Gelernter link to tinyurl.com

What is this religiously heightened nationalism?

Fast speed judgment I admit.

http://tinyurl.com/4okapl

Amazon lists my favorite expert on the topic, Roger Griffin, as a contributor. A good sign if you ask me.

http://tinyurl.com/4bvnzh

Anything on the US scene?