There is a sort of echo of the situation in inter bellum Poland.

Before WW1 Polish Jews and Polish Germans generally got along fairly well, for they functioned in different and complementary sectors of the economy of the Polish territories.

After WW1 the ethnic Polish leaders worked with Polish Jews to drive Polish Germans out of the economy, and Jewish-German hostility reached extreme levels.

Later suspicion developed towards Polish Jews because of the Soviet Jewish connection, but the Polish state needed Jews even more after the ruination of the Polish German economic sector, and the Polish government may have underestimated the Soviet threat in the aftermath of the Miracle of Warsaw.

I talk about the intra-Jewish difference in link to members.aol.com
but the section link to members.aol.com
is also important.

new agenda same as old agenda. next generation, after serving in the israeli sadism force, will have israel incised on…

(what the old and the new and the future do for their entity):
Tough Love for Israel: The Deceitful `Peace Process'
Henry Siegman — The Nation

"… There is no prospect for a viable, sovereign Palestinian state, primarily because Israel's various governments, from 1967 until today, have never had the intention of allowing such a state to come into being … As long as Israel knows that by delaying the peace process it buys time to create facts on the ground, and that the international community will continue to indulge Israel's pretense that its desire for a two-state solution is being frustrated by the Palestinians, no new peace initiative can succeed, and the dispossession of the Palestinian people will indeed become irreversible."

September 29, 1919, p. 7, New York Times

FELIX M. WARBURG TELLS
SAD PLIGHT OF JEWS
Felix M. Warburg Says They Were the Worst Sufferers in War.

Felix M. Warburg, Chairman of the Joint Distribution Committee of American Funds for Jewish War Sufferers, who returned several days ago from a trip to Europe for that organization, made public yesterday some of his findings.

'The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry,' he said, 'and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population of the earth.

'The Jewish people throughout Eastern Europe, by sheer accident of geography, have suffered more from the war than any other element of the population. The potential vitality and the capacity for self-help that remains to those people after the last five years is amazing to me.'

The people are deeply moved by the help given them by America, Mr. Warburg said, but it would be fatal to lessen the emergency aid now while millions are in tragic need. The $30,000,000 spent by this committee, he said, has fed and clothed more than a million children and it has renewed the hope of five million parents and elders.

'For more than four years,' he said, 'The war on the Eastern front was fought largely in the congested centers of Jewish population. A straight north and south line from Riga, on the Baltic, to Salonica, on the Aegean Sea, will touch every important battle area of the Eastern war zone and every center of Jewish population. After the cataclysm of the last few years it is too much to expect this Jewry to become self-sustaining in a short twelve-month.'

Mr. Warburg is concerned over the program soon to be started for the discontinuance of emergency relief. This plan, he said, calls for the formation of a $10,000,000 reconstruction corporation.

'This organization,' he said, 'would afford facilities for constructive aid to Jews abroad in the way of loans and credit at nominal interest rates. The value of this sort of assistance as a substitute for pure charity is apparent.'

Other relief projects recommended by Mr. Warburg include the establishment of an express company to forward money and packages from Jews in this country to relatives and friends abroad; the distribution of $120,000 worth of fuel in sections of Poland where destitution is greatest; the purchase of $300,000 worth of cloth in the bolt whereby unemployed workmen of Poland may get raw material, and a plan to reunite those Jewish families that have relatives in the United States and those who have become separated abroad."

note from me: during vietnam conflict and gulf war 1, jews also suffered more than all other sectors of se asia and iraq.

Seems there's already a lot to build on for the look from TV sitcoms over the last decades. Instead of cutsy back & forth, you play romantic with big-time serious undertones.

Growing up, for me the WASP "preppie" style set the standard–except when I didn't live in the small suburbs; in the city it could get you harassed, beat up.

Since the early 80's there's been a plethora of teen-young adult movies where the bad guy's been the WASP preppie (nearly always rich & blonde).

For a quarter of a century.

So, now will this cultural role casting slowly reverse?

What will the usual teen-young adult movie and TV couple
series show us, say in 2030? Which type will be the usual bad guy versus our hero protagonist?

Having said that I'm no WASP lover–I've always hated frat rats; besides, look at what they did to our country–why, just look at Bush–he makes a good case for good riddance.

mentions two following cases (among other unpleasant facts about the guy in question):

"Schwarzman pledged ten million dollars to the Kennedy Center, but the pledge was to be fulfilled over ten years, which gave it a present value significantly lower than ten million. According to a fellow member of the library board, “He has given, but not remotely what he could. A big capital campaign is coming up. We hope that he’ll give very generously.”
One of Schwarzman’s most controversial proposed gifts was to Yale, his alma mater, which, during the late nineties, agreed to name the freshman dining commons after Schwarzman in return for $17 million. Some people at Yale thought the commitment was in hand, but it emerged that Schwarzman’s gift would actually be a contribution to one of Blackstone’s investment partnerships on Yale’s behalf. No money would change hands until the fund was liquidated, and there was a risk that the investment might be worth far less than $17 million (although there was also the possibility that it would be worth more). Yale balked at trading a significant naming opportunity for what it considered a speculative commitment, and Schwarzman did not give the money."

I am not in favor of smear campaigns and so am a bit uncomfortable crossing into this territory, but somehow I feel this guy's history warrants a closer examination of the matter.

There is something very obtuse about the above claim because practically all of Poland was a battlefield in WW1, which was then followed by the Polish Soviet War of 1920.

Warburg apparently looked at Poland and saw only Jewish suffering which differed in no obvious way from ethnic Polish suffering.

Anybody wonder why all five members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are Jews.

Jewish wealth and influence are likely to recede (at least on a relative basis) in the years ahead as the economy shifts away from parasitic financial bubbles that enrich the few at the expense of the many towards more productive and useful activities.

The heavily Jewish financial industry is on the ropes but farmers are prospering as never before. And very few farmers and ranchers are Jewish.

i know very little about such things but i will guess that farmers and truck drivers and teachers and soldiers and fry cooks will be bailing out the financial industry.

This is not intended to be merely a rhetorical question, I am really curious as to the basis of your allegation, Phil.

Over the weekend I spent some time reading a book by Stephen Kinzer detailing how the American and British governments conducted the overthrow of the Iranian regime in 1953. Subsequently, the Shah maintained an iron hand over the Iranian people and was seen as a not so benevolent imposition of American power. Ever since the Shah was forced from power in the late 70's, Iran has maintained a degree of hostility toward America. I certainly don't see this hostility as some sort of intrinsic hatred of Americans. Instead it should be seen as a justified resentment of America having imposed its own interests upon Iranians in a very undemocratic fashion, using bribes, controlled media…and whatever other levers of power available to impose American power upon suffering Iranians. Granted most Americans did not actively support that coup, but it was performed for our 'benefit', by our governing body.

Are not most Americans out here in flyover land likewise entitled to a degree of resentment toward those who impose our MidEast policies designed to 'benefit' Israel upon us? Why would any reasonable person conclude that resentment to be a form of racism as suggested by the "anti-semitic" labeling?