Comments on: Bush Saw Clinton as ‘Satan’s Finger on Earth,’ Says Former Bush Aide

By: Jim Haygood

Jim Haygood — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Some fundamentalist Christians regard Bush as a Satan worshiper; this article being an example of the genre:

http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=1845

The Masonic cult which laid out the capital's street grid included an inverted pentagram, with the White House forming the inverted point of it.

http://www.geocities.com/jussaymoe/Pentagram/pent_to_pyr.htm

Likely they're ALL on Lucifer's payroll. Bush's "Satan's finger" remark probably related to Clinton's Peyronie's disease, so vividly described by Paula Jones in her deposition.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/ask_the_doctor/peyronies.shtml

By: neocognitism

neocognitism — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

All too convenient to blame Bush's pathology and treason on his evangelical beliefs, instead of loyalty to his particular clan's financial and political allies.

By: ej

ej — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

'abandoning the peace process'?
There was no peace process to begin with, so how could it be abandoned?
Instead, variations on a theme of misrepresentation. After the election, more of the same.

By: MRW

MRW — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

And there are two other explanationd for the so-called Lucifer sign.

(1) Hand symbol for the University of Texas Longhorns.

(2) Sign language symbol for Love.

By: Glenn Condell

Glenn Condell — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

If Clinton is Satan's finger, what part of the devil's anatomy is reserved for Bush himself?

I know you think the difference between Clinton and Bush is by degree rather than kind - that they simply sit on discrete points on an axis of evil - but Bush really does seem to believe all that religious guff ('Satan' indeed, this from the leader of the free fucking world?!) whereas it's impossible to believe that Clinton has any mystical feelings at all.

It is the difference of the crackpot fanatic and the cynical realist, and that is a difference of kind. Dangers abound with both types but I know which I would rather have (if I couldn't have someone sensible like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich) at the controls.

Clinton was a pretty poor president given the advantages he had. Like Tony Blair, his mettle proved weaker than his rhetoric. That Bush makes him look halfway acceptable just demonstrates the depths he has plumbed.

By: Auto Sinister

Auto Sinister — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

And the Bush families own history proves they are the devils asshole.

By: A Reader

A Reader — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Nonsense. Anyone remember back when Bush Sr. was Vice President and a little thing called Iran-Contra occurred? Remember under whose nose the Iran-Contra drug aircraft were flying? Hint: They were landing in Mena, Arkansas.

By: tquigly

tquigly — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Perchance Boosh was looking in the mirror when he said this

By: ted

ted — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

ej--
there was a very active peace process in the middle east during the clinton years. violence was at the lowest levels since before the troubles started. don't be a ditto-head. it kills children.

ted

By: samuel burke

samuel burke — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Choices!

Barak Obama, a man of the people.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2URJrHjsRI