Washington Post Says Netanyahu Got 3/4 of His Campaign Donations From U.S. Right Wingers

by Philip Weiss on July 29, 2008 · 9 comments

Last night at dinner my sister asked me Why if everyone and his brother is for the two-state solution is there not a real push for a two-state solution? The easy answer is that the Israel lobby in the U.S., which has virtually set policy, is dominated by the right wing. The neocons are Our Likud, and they have been in every ruling coalition in the U.S. since 92, allowing further colonization.

Again, J Street (for all my misgivings) must be seen as a powerful break with this pattern, an effort to redeem the Jewish people from neoconservatism. Rami Khouri referred to J Street hopefully in the lecture I heard the other night. And J Street seems to have licensed journalism on the Israel lobby in a way that Walt and Mearsheimer were not able to. Here is a fabulous piece by Griff Witte in the Washington Post, exposing the way that rightwingers in the U.S. have sustained Binyamin Netanyahu’s wannabe restoration in Israel, to put a kibosh on the peace process. The U.S. swagmen gather at intimate events where you’re told, If you like what you heard, just leave a check on your chair.

Former prime minister and Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu, for instance, received approximately $400,000 — 75 percent of his donations for a 2007 primary — from U.S. contributors, according to the Israeli comptroller’s office…

Jeremy Ben-Ami, executive director of J Street, a new U.S.-based lobbying firm that supports dovish Israeli positions, said it is no surprise that hawkish Israeli politicians benefit most from U.S. money.

“The American Jews who hold the more conservative views toward Israel are also the ones who tend to be most actively engaged with Israel,” Ben-Ami said. “Liberal American Jews tend not to single out Israel as the focus of their philanthropy.”

I don’t understand why this isn’t a scandal here, why all the interconnections in Netanyahu’s network of supporters, from Sheldon Adelson to Irving Moskowitz of AEI to Dore Gold (who gets $96,000 a year as a “scholar” from the AEI) to Doug Feith are not exposed, and the dual-loyalty of the thing blasted into the sunlight. Grant Smith wrote a book about The Clean Break, the neocons’ blueprint for Netanyahu in ‘96, and Walt and Mearsheimer wrote about the blueprint in their book, in the context of an “overlapping set of [neoconservative] Washington-based think tanks, committees and publications.” Smith and W&M were called conspiracy theorists. Actually, it’s just journalism. Thank God the Post is getting on the case.

P.S. Obama met with Netanyahu in Israel. Why did he do that? Who owns Obama? Why can’t he shun Netanyahu? Where is J Street on that?

Related posts:

  1. Netanyahu would deny Palestinians 4 rights of any sovereign state, and ‘Washington Post’ won’t tell you that
  2. ‘Washington Post’ Diplomatic Correspondent Says Iraq War Was to ‘Help Israel’
  3. Washington Post Columnist Gives Private AIPAC Talks on How to Help Israel in ‘08 Election
  4. ‘Washington Post’ urges dismissal of AIPAC espionage case, asks for counter-argument, and promptly rejects same
  5. Washington Post Blogger Says Obama ‘Kowtows to Israeli Lobby’

{ 9 comments }

1 rimeswifew July 29, 2008 at 6:28 pm

ironic innit? The righteous are smeared as conspiratorialists by those who see(or pretend to) an anti-semite under every bush.

2 syvanen July 29, 2008 at 7:02 pm

Dick Morris has written (http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/) that if Mofaz is PM by October he might attack Iran — Morris thinks this could throw the election to McCain.

3 StewartNusbaumer July 29, 2008 at 11:04 pm

Well, since something like 3/4 of American Jews voted for Kerry, and a similar percentage voted for Gore, it seems to me to be silly to talk about the Jewish people redeeming themselves from neoconservatism. If other Americans had voted as Jewish Americans had voted, there would not have been any neocon sickness in the White House. It would have been just another silly ideology of stupid Americans.

4 MRW July 29, 2008 at 11:49 pm

Mr. Nusbaumer,

Discussing the "silly ideology of stupid Americans" in full throttle and honestly gets a Past US President branded an anti-semite, ruins careers, smears and isolates congressmen.

If what you wrote was all there was to it, why would Philip Weiss have this blog?

5 Switalla July 30, 2008 at 2:37 am

Mr. Nusbaumer:

Insert "jewish" between "stupid" and "americans."

Then I'll agree with you.

6 Hlmeankin July 30, 2008 at 4:39 am

Stewart, its more accurate to say that if more Jewish Americans had taken strong action to protest the lies fed the American public and politicans by the Neocons,the Jewish ones, when the drumbeat for war with Iraq began six years ago, the war with Iraq would have never happened. I estimate more are protesting the new push for war with Iran,
but fear they still won't accept (as the realistic dove is prepared to) an Iran with nuclear weapons..see his comment on his blog to me..

7 Laurie July 30, 2008 at 7:01 am

J Street is Zionism lite, which means it is still Zionism. When they call for an end to aid to Israel, I'll take them seriously, until then they are just making smoke.

8 charles Keating July 30, 2008 at 1:07 pm

More American goys voted for Bush's war American jews.
On the other hand, the usual hi-profile American Jewish organizations spoke loudly with their unusual silence when Bush-Chaney beat their drums for war on Iraq, and so, now Iran?

Should we apply a Goldhagen approach to the American Jewish silence?

9 Stellar April 9, 2009 at 9:41 am

Hi,

It is such a useful article and I found a lot of information with the help of this article. Thank you so much for sharing.

Stella

washington drug rehab

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: At a Privileged Resort, an Arab Intellectual Urges Americans to ‘Be Themselves’ in the Mid East: Be Fair

Next post: Is Bible-Thumping Lieberman Giving His Dem Backers Buyers’ Remorse, Aiding Obama?