In the case of the Bush administration, the funders of Bush's campaign bought low taxes and deregulation.

Did the Obama supporters previously support Bush?

What happens to the tax law when Obama is elected, with a democratic Congress?

If it passes rational tax law (progressive, and increases sufficient to fund good governance), then I would conclude that the Jewish donors did so from principles and conviction, NOT from self-interest, and certainly not as a "corruption" of the system.

What do you think?

Phil Weiss has discussed the New Jewish Elite on his Mondoweiss Blog, and recently he added an entry on Journalism's Old-Boy-Network and Zionism.

Boston Magazine's July issue includes an article entitled Seeking: Nosy Jewish Moms that provides some strong circumstantial evidence both of

• the Jewish old boys (and girls) network in the news industry as well as of 
• the elite status of the American Jewish community. 

Could the article possibly have been published without such a Jewish journalistic network? Would anyone care about the topic if Jews did not constitute the New American Elite?

I can't find a shred of news or even interesting feature information in the article except perhaps the paragraph:

Simcha members continue to meet monthly at Gewirtz's home, matching everyone they can: singles, divorcees, widowers of all ages. (Sorry, no goyim allowed.) They can't yet boast a marriage, but they're optimistic.

Would a white gentile matchmaking coffee klatsch with no successes merit a feature article in Boston Magazine?

How would the writer have treated such a gentile group if it applied a rule to disqualify blacks as marriage candidates?

http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB121608018071652749.html

to me, "aristocracy" is not the right word. these moneyed fanatics are among the worst humans in history.

I prefer American-Jewish Oligarchs as a counterpart to the commonly used Russian-Jewish Oligarchs.