i was going to use my vote to show my disgust for what used to be my party and vote for Barr, but after the speech tonight i am going to vote for Obama simply because i do not want any more neocon repubs to have the reign of power…under them i fear for my rights as an american….tonight i was told of a stunt the tsa pulled at the philly airport where they pulled up a table near the gates in an area where the passengers had already gone through the mandatory search, and started staring down passengers glaring at them as they passed until he spotted one guy whom he told that he needed to be searched again.

the psychological intimidation is part of the security state's plan to train the sheep not to bleet, but to obey.

Go Obama.
be the nightmare the neocons think you are.

I'm with Ozzie Maland – I'll believe it when I see it. ESS and Diebold may have the final word.

It wouldn't be the first time.

Nascar uniform, my ass. Your friend is a putz.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080828_cleaning_up_after_bush/

Sen. Joseph Biden, according to the analysts, was made the Democratic vice presidential nominee because he knows everything about foreign policy. But everything that he knows about foreign policy is just what everybody else in Washington knows and thinks, and would never dream of questioning. There’s the problem.

An Obama-Biden administration would lower the rhetoric of the war on terror and enter global negotiations with Iran. It would emphasize the common interest of the U.S. and Iran in the stabilization of Iraq and Afghanistan. It would acknowledge the political and social importance of Hamas and Hezbollah in the real world.

It would start over again with Israel-Palestine negotiations. Those backing the Obama candidacy talk about a “New Marshall Plan” for the Middle East (resembling Condoleezza Rice’s proposals last month in Foreign Affairs), offering a “generational” program to lift the Middle East “from misery” and make it democratic, pro-American, and friendly to Israel. Alas, we have heard all that before; the United States is incapable of doing it; and the problem of the Middle East isn’t money.

The leaders of such a new administration would negotiate with American allies rather than blackmail and bully them. They would resume good relations with international organizations and make good-faith use of them. They would protect the sovereignty of Georgia and Ukraine. They would be firm with Russia. They would protect Western energy sources. They will fight injustice wherever they find it, even if that means more war. They will make a better world. Good luck to them.

Think peace is going to break out when the multi-culti messiah puts his feet up on the desk in the Oval Office? Well, I hate to disappoint all you loyal Democrats – and optimistic sorts – out there, but you had better think again ….

Biden's connections to the region are suspicious, to say the least. When lobbyist Stephen Payne was caught on tape saying he could arrange for the rehabilitation of a certain Central Asian ex-dictator for a hefty "donation" to the Bush library, he also mentioned that Biden could be brought along – presumably for a price. Bruce Ettinger, formerly Biden's director of legislative affairs, is Payne's business partner.

Biden's dubious involvement in the politics of the region is underscored by his most recent moral crusade: a bid, in tandem with the Heritage Foundation and other neoconservative groups in Washington, to publicize the plight of "democrats" in the oil-rich nation of Kazakhstan. His recent letter to the President of that country, chiding him for his country's lack of democracy, may have something to do with Kazakhstan's recent decision to consider pumping its oil through Russian pipelines, rather than through the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan route that U.S. and British investors have such a major stake in.

link to lewrockwell.com

"A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar."
~ H. L. Mencken

July 2, 2008, Barack Obama spoke in Colorado Springs, CO: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Like all democrats, BO has, in the words of the great anti-democrat, Albert Jay Nock, "a monstrous itch for changing people." Mobilizing masses of disaffected youths into paramilitary units like those in fascist Italy and national-socialist Germany is a hallmark of all great democrats like Hitler and Mussolini.

An unseasonable chill should have spread through in the old bones of America after Barack spoke. Nothing much happened. Only the usual pro-liberty suspects complained. Few others seemed to notice. The Mob didn’t seem to hear the rattling of slaves’ chains in Barry’s promise. If they did, they didn’t care.

BO sends us two messages: one, our military is unreliable; two, we need to replicate this unreliable creature in the domestic arena. Being a civilian national security force it will, of course, be totally "volunteer."

Democratic militaries are by nature unreliable. They have as their means "total war" to the end of total and unconditional defeat. Its consequent goals are subjugation, dominance, and annihilation. Yes, creating such a beast in the domestic arena makes good sense to the democratic total Statist.

And, by the way Barry, just what are your "national security objectives’? Who internally will be the enemy of your domestic total war? Who to subjugate? Who to dominate? Who to annihilate?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhH2q6h7_Ow&eurl=link to lewrockwell.com

obama, the safety of israel….obama cant be trusted with our neocolonialist fascist project.

mccain is our man.

BTW On what Obama kept saying is the key seminal test, what sets the "Black messiah" apart from all others. Was the war. Which Biden voted FOR!!!!!!!!