What Planet Do We Live On Dept.: Israel Lobbyist Dismisses ‘J Street’ as ‘Pro-Palestinian’

The National, the fascinating new paper coming out of Abu Dhabi, has a smart long piece on J Street. It includes this exchange, which only reveals how shockingly poor the American discourse is:

“There is no question that J Street is pro-Palestinian, but it remains
to be seen if it’s pro-Israel,” said Jeff Ballabon, a New York lawyer
and lobbyist who acts as an intermediary between conservative
Republican candidates, Orthodox Jewish donors and Christian activists.

But
such complaints illuminate the tilted state of debate more than
anything else: J Street, like its rivals, acknowledges the reality of
Palestinian violence, but unlike them, it also seeks to draw attention
to the plight of the Palestinian people. “As long as Palestinians
despair of a decent and dignified life, Israel will be at war,” [J Street director Jeremy] Ben-Ami
wrote in a Washington Post op-ed earlier this year. “Helping the
Palestinians achieve a viable, prosperous state is one of the most
pro-Israel things an American politician can do.”

Let's be clear. J Street is a largely Jewish organization, of liberal Zionists, who don't oppose AIPAC but are trying to lobby it. Justin Vogt, the piece's author notes, shrewdly, that the leading Jewish organizations in the U.S., AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents, are for "the peace process," but have done all they can to limit abridgments of Israel's "power and territory." He also wee-wees a little on Walt and Mearsheimer in the usual way, by giving space to their critics, but basically adopts their line. The lobby is a "goliath."

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine, US Policy in the Middle East, US Politics

{ 4 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. syvanen says:

    This is the telling sentence: "AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents, are for 'the peace process,' but have done all they can to limit abridgments of Israel's 'power and territory.'"

    When those entities define Israel's territory as being in the West Bank (and they do if we judge by their actions and not just their words) then the peace process is meaningless. It is totally absurd to continue supporting a "peace process" where the stated goals of building two states is already negated by the Israelis from the beginning.

    That is why we must drop the two state solution. Working for that goal simply provides the Israelis cover to increase their settlements, to continue building facts on the ground. The negotiations have been going on for 16 and that is their only result. To continue is to continue the charade, but more distructively, put off until some undefined future for the Palestinians are allowed freedom and civil liberties. That should be the goal today. Work for Palestinian freedom and civil liberties, not obstruction, delay and charades.

  2. americangoy says:

    This is funny, in a pathetic sort of a way.

  3. Richard Witty says:

    And you continue to wee-wee on J street rather than using your skills to assist their work.

  4. Anonymous says:

    This is a test.

Leave a Reply