Comments on: More on PEP, From Anti-Zionist Jews

By: Rowan Berkeley

Rowan Berkeley — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

good old Jeff.

By: observer

observer — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

While Phil goes to the conference next sunday, and we wait to have Hillary's confirmation affirmed as Secretary of State, it remains true that the appointment of Rahm Emanuel as president-elect Barack Obama’s new chief of staff drew a wave of jubilation in Israel at the prospect of the son of an Irgun fighter running the White House, and a wave of condemnation in the Arab world for much the same reason. The Israeli press embraced him as “Obama’s Israeli,” while the Arab press derided him as an agent for the Mossad. In comparison, in the American Press no clue to this giant soft WW3 is given, mostly just gossip about
how Emanuel is a pit bull at getting campaign donations. The silence in the vaunted Fourth Estate hurts my ears.

Why do they hate us?

By: Ed

Ed — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

@ Observer: "The silence in the vaunted Fourth Estate hurts my ears. Why do they hate us?"

What do Jewish Zionists and the mainstream media demographic have in common? They are largely left-liberal, they are largely elitist, they are largely pseudo-righteous (ie highly selective about their moral outrage) and they are both intertwined with a socialist oligarchy that extracts resources from the provinces, consolidates them in Washington and New York, and divies them up primarily to elite insiders and the connected, allowing a pittance to trickle down to everyone else simply to keep the lid on.

The left-liberal mainstream media are part of the Zionist scam, and have been for decades.

By: Rowan Berkeley

Rowan Berkeley — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

You have a positively Birchist determination to define all forms of tyranny as 'socialist', Ed, let me tell you.

By: observer

observer — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

Rowan, I disagree. If you've followed Ed's posts over the last couple of years, the conventional modern form of Republicans do not get off the hook at all (and neither do 1940s-style fascist regimes and
groups); Ed is not a traditional Birchist at all. I bet he would agree that NAZI stands for National Socialist Workers Party--you need to
appreciate Ed's depth. Socialism is the way to mask negative elite agendas so they will be accepted by populists.

Corporate welfare and corporate hegemony partnering with
standard liberal welfare interests--that's our current situation.

I'm sure Ed would like to see the Obama regime get rid of that, though I'm equally sure he does not see it happening, especially
as the Obama cabinet slowly appears.

Ed is a libertarian, and a Constitutionalist, and he knows the roots
of the best of this nation derive from Christian impulses partnering with the Enlightenment--the Deist way.

Hagee et all are not really Christian at all.

Ed knows the parables of Christ.

Look at Ed's POV over the last couple years of posts here.

By: Ed

Ed — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

@RB

Hitler was an ethnic fundamentalist socialist; the Stalinists and Jewish Bolsheviks were communist-socialists, the early Zionists and the current Jewish diaspora sustainers of Zionism are ethnic fundamentalist socialists. They all use the cover of socialism to pursue their narcissistic, megalomaniacal agendas, and make Gods of themselves and their comrades. Same with Bush and his Neocons comrades, and now Obama and his Neolib comrades. They all want to consolidate power under their authority, and exercise it as they see fit.

The Founders understood that religion has a place, and government has a (limited) place, and never the two shall meet. They also understood how essential the diffusion of power is, particularly to prevent corruption and abuse of power, hence federalism and checks and balances.

Socialists (who could more correctly be described as elitist charlatans selling socialist salvation) are so intellectually stunted, narcissistic and megalomaniacal, they simply can’t fathom their own corruptible nature and the corrupted nature of man. What’s not to despise?

By: observer

observer — Mon, 29 Nov 1999 23:00:00 +0000

What is Christian, rather than Jewish?
Why not start here:

The country did pretty damn well for its first 150 odd years with the Protestant establishment running things. And for several decades after that, it was able to run on the fumes of their ethic. But it’s failing fast today (not coincidentally as the Jewish Establishment, the Wall Street banksters and the centralizing socialists have solidified their hold) and there's zero chance that this bunch can ever turn things around.

My remedy? Cut government, decentralize, and reassert State’s rights. Tighten up the borders to keep wages up, reward domestic manufacturing and employment and charge foreign manufacturing for access to our market. Institute school vouchers so religious schools can make a comeback (and force competition upon the cesspool public schools, most of which will likely fail for lack of customers), hollow out military spending, and quit subsidizing Zionists, authoritarian Muslims, the defense of European socialists, etc., and quit trying to play God and police/control the world.

It really isn't rocket science. But such a program, probably the only kind of program that could save the country, would be virtually impossible to attain under the psychotic "elite" currently running the country. Half of them are simply milking the country for all the money they can like pimps running their whores, and the other ideological half would rather see the country collapse than admit their socialist way is quit obviously insane.