Are we witnessing ethnic cleansing?

by Philip Weiss on December 27, 2008 · 4 comments

Remember how the west condemned Russia's attacks on South Ossetia in Georgia? What is the Israeli policy in Gaza? Here is John Mearsheimer writing two weeks ago on TPM:

As [Avraham] Burg makes clear in his book, today's Israelis are a hard-nosed lot who have contempt for the Palestinians and do not trust them enough to give them a state of their own. And he sees this situation getting worse, not better, over time.

So, if there is no two-state solution and Israel continues building a Greater Israel by expanding the settlements and road networks in the West Bank and keeping the Palestinians in Gaza locked up in a giant cage, where does Israel end up? What is the happy ending to this story?

It seems to me that there is no happy ending. Greater Israel will either have to engage in massive ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians to remain a democratic and Jewish state, or it will become an apartheid state, as Olmert predicted…

Related posts:

  1. ‘60 Minutes’ gives Israel 3 options: ethnic cleansing, apartheid, or democracy
  2. Zionists use the violence to revive ‘48 model: ethnic cleansing
  3. To explain Hamas rockets, Haaretz describes ethnic cleansing of Majdl (Ashkelon) in 1953!!
  4. Israeli ethnic cleansing in Jerusalem is getting increased attention – will the US & EU step up to stop it?
  5. Latest Episode of Ethnic Cleansing Gets Two Jews Talking About Why They Should Care About Israel

{ 4 comments }

1 Richard Witty December 27, 2008 at 3:11 pm

Mearsheimer's observations are accurate (two-state solution necessary but impossible with the current Israeli political consciousness – he neglected the role of the Palestinians which is alternately accepting and violently hating), but old, and not all that informative. Good, to be reminded though.

His most relevant comment is why aren't American Jews commenting?

One reason:

1. There is no obvious good alternative.

The oft-stated assertion by the left is that in the absence of injustice, justice will emerge.

But, Israelis and American Jews hear of (accurately) of not justice in response to injustice, but of injustice in response to injustice.

And, in that formula "never again" is better than opening one's doors to terror.

Hamas shelling towns in the southern Negev is not perceived of as resistance to a blockade, but as terror on civilians.

Sderot is not only the home of Sharon's ranch (and the ballsiness it represents). Its also the home of the Israeli open rock scene. American anarchists don't know that.

The ART of dissent, rather than the muscle of dissent, is in designing a path that yeilds peace, not a pendulum.

2 nitwit December 27, 2008 at 4:41 pm

But, Israelis and American Jews hear of (accurately) of not justice in response to injustice, but of injustice in response to injustice.

Yes, Arabs only understand and respect power. An argument with a long tradition that needs to be repeated over and over again.

As they are not only Israel's enemies but plan in fact to take over the planet. Where again, have we heard this before?

3 Richard Witty December 27, 2008 at 5:21 pm

Nitwit,
Show me an alternative. Something that Israelis that seek peace can derive some hope and path for.

Absent that, you are just confirming my point.

4 donsmith7777 December 29, 2008 at 12:10 pm

Hamas brought this on themselves.

Hamas is one one that wants to see Jews ethnicly cleansed from the Middle East.

The author of this blog is obviously a Hamas sympathizer.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: ‘Surgical strikes,’ with U.S. backing, in the most densely populated place on earth

Next post: A playground, a marketplace, girls walking home from school (and calls for revenge)