Consider the analysis below of a recent HDS Greenway op-ed published in the Boston Globe, which is owned by the NY Times.

Greenway used to be a lot better than the content of this piece indications.

Decent Muslims versus Evil Jews
International [Jewish Zionist Shyster] Law
by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)

On February 10 H.D.S. Greenway published an exceptionally dishonest op-ed column entitled The rise of extremism in London – The Boston Globe. He wrote:

There has been a big spike in anti-Semitic incidents here in recent weeks, and by no means all of it by Muslims. A senior official involved with community relations told me that anti-Semitic events had increased five-fold since the Gaza war began. Jonathan Freedland, columnist for The Guardian, wrote last week that just as "progressive voices insisted that Muslims were not to be branded as guilty by association, just because the killers of 9/11 and 7/7 had been Muslims," so should it now be made clear that Jews in general should not be held responsible for Israel's behavior in Gaza. "There has been no chorus of liberal voices insisting that no matter how intense their fury, people must not take out that anger on Britain's Jewish community," Freedland wrote.

The situations of Muslims after 9/11 or 7/11 and of Jews after the Zionist rampage in Gaza are not comparable.

No statistic of Muslims anywhere showed significant Muslim support for either attack. Yet the ADL published ADL Survey Shows American Jews Overwhelmingly Supported Israel's Gaza Action on its website.

This article reports:

• Asked whether Israel's response to Hamas rockets was appropriate or excessive, probably the major theme that has appeared in international critiques of Israel, 79% said it was appropriate, 17% excessive (graph). By denomination breakdown: Orthodox – 88%, appropriate, Conservative – 80%, Reform – 80% and non-practicing – 71%

• When asked about Israel's right to self-defense versus the need to win the "hearts and minds" of the Arab world, 79% said that Israel's responsibility to protect its citizens takes precedence (graph).

The American Jewish community is dominated by evil Jewish Nazis, who support the slaughter of women and children.

The UK Jewish community is probably even more Nazi.

By the standards generally pushed by Jewish intellectuals since WW2, decent people have a categorical imperative to hate Jews failing to reject the Jewish community and refusing to condemn the State of Israel unequivocally.

Despite Zionist propaganda asserting Israel's general responsibility or obligation to protect its citizens, international law confers no such duties and even restricts the use of such assertions as disproof of allegations of committing crimes against humanity.

[Note that Israel has never made efforts, whether lawful or not, to protect its non-Jewish citizens.]

Under Nuremberg Law, which the USA helped create, Israel has no right of self-defense in the face of resistance acts by the occupied or ethnically cleansed Palestinian refugee population.

Jewish Zionists in academia and in the government have desperately been trying to reinterpret post-Nuremberg International Law to render irreversible the Zionist theft and ethnic cleansing of the native Palestinian population.

This sort of intended or practical shyster lawyering has characterized the Zionist program since the first Zionist Conference at Basel.

Because Zionist manipulation of International Law would be far more obvious to lay observers if Zionism were properly identified as ethnic Ashkenazi Nazism and as the exact equivalent of German Nazism with the obvious ethnic substitutions, Jewish Zionists invariably freak out at the correct conclusion that Israel is a Nazi state and try to equate this patently obvious observation with the most vicious sort of anti-Semitism.

In fact, not only is it dishonest to deny Israel's Nazi nature, but it is also racist, for characterizing one ethnic group as incapable of developing its own form of Nazism is simply a belief in that group's racial superiority in politics and ethics.

It is almost needless to say that the vast majority of Jews do have such a racist belief, and nowadays except for tiny groups of dissenters Judaism is no longer a genuine religion dedicated to serving God but consists of a combination of ethnic narcissism, Holocaust obsession, and worship of the State of Israel.

As for the remaning part of the Palestinian region, it would be better for it top be absorbed by Jordan, rename the country Jordania Palestinia (after all, it's other 2 names only lasted less than 100 years). There is enough room and Saudi money to relocate the over population of Arabs in the western region.

The Saudis can also finance a tunnel to link Gaza to Jordania
Palestinia.

I guess the question is would Jordan want them???

At least that's what would happen in a just world.

In other words, a larger version of Gaza, without the economy of Jerusalem or the water resources of Ariel. Not exactly the 2 state solution, certainly not viable, although no doubt it will be sold as such.

Chris Berel, the Israelis don't want the West Bank to become part of Jordan, since in their eyes that will be a security problem. Put another way, Israel wants to control the Jordan river and Dead Sea. On the other hand, Israel would like the West Bank Palestinians to all move to Jordan.

The fact that the Times wants to paint any Israeli government–no matter how extreme–as one of us, is truly frightening.

(Phil and Adam, I've learned from you that we need to start asking for "full disclosure" statements from every reporter: that is, "Full disclosure: I was raised _____and [if apt] converted to ____."

How sad that we've [long ago] reached the point where "reporters'" prejudices censor what they [don't] "report"–till the "story" is simply a fairy tale.)