Barghouti to Obama: 2 states now, or a long violent struggle over apartheid because ‘we will be free’

by Philip Weiss on February 13, 2009 · 35 comments

It is hard to imagine that after all the coverage of Gaza you could go into an event in New York and walk out stunned, but such was my experience hearing Mustafa Barghouti this afternoon at Columbia University. The Palestinian doctor and politician who lives in the West Bank got into Gaza for a week at the end of the onslaught– it took him two days to get there from Ramallah, through Jordan and Egypt, in what should have been a 1-1/2 hour hour trip–and entered with the belief that his nonstop watching of Al-Jazeera had prepared him for the destruction. It did not.

"What I've seen shocked me…. Believe me, when I went there I was shocked to the level that for the first time in my life, I could not talk about it for four days. And now it is my duty to tell the people of the world what has happened to the people of Gaza."

The old people Barghouti talked to said they had never seen anything like it either–not in ’48, ’56, ’67, '88, or 2000. "They all told me that this has been the most brutal thing they have ever seen." And so his job today, before getting to any politics, was to bear witness to a room filled to bursting with 220 people or so, many of them Palestinian intellectuals in the Diaspora, as Barghouti put it.
Bargo It is hard to convey Barghouti’s presentation in a piece of writing without being numbing. He showed us gruesome photos of the mysterious armaments that burned their way down into people’s flesh, eating their skin and tissue away. He told the stories of five daughters killed in one family, and of another two girls who watched their father, who had left the house after three days to get water, shot and bound and left in the street to serve as a target dummy. His wife and daughters watched their father executed. "That is the story I heard from his wife," he said, voice breaking.

He said that families that had fled the attacks often divided their children and left them in different houses, so that a strike would not kill all their children at once. And the Gazans had reason to fear this: the killing of 1300 is equivalent to a quarter million Americans dying.

"Have you see these images on U.S. television?" One picture after another of leveled neighborhoods, bulldozed factories. Before the onslaught, there had been 351 working factories left in Gaza, "the last remaining part of the private sector that was not destroyed yet." Most were destroyed. "They were destroyed when the Israeli army was leaving Gaza in the last two days.The Israeli army put dynamite in them." He showed us pictures of one man’s factory where the Israelis in leaving had demolished the factory, his gardens, his trucks, his cars.

"And up to this moment they are not allowing a single sack of cement to enter Gaza." And most of the glass in Gaza was shattered, but glass is not allowed in either, as a "strategic material." Windows are covered with plastic.

Of course, this kind of horror requires analysis, and it was here that the talk left the realm of physical destruction to go the true devastation, the Israeli soul.

Israeli society is deeply corrupt. It is dominated by generals who are churned out year after year by the military industrial complex, and it depends on sales of armaments to other countries. The Gaza destruction had this as one of its motivations, in addition to regime change, which failed, and electing Kadima/Labor, which also failed: a weapons show. These policies have hurt the Israeli people. "The Israeli public got the right message from this kind of brutal approach. If brutality is the only thing that will work with the Palestinians, then we should choose Lieberman, who is a neofascist."

It is not sufficient to say that the Israelis moved right in the recent election. Israel always moves to the right. "This is a move towards racism, this is a move towards extremism. This is a move that in my opinion is a declaration, that Israel is accepting to be an apartheid state. This is the last chapter where occupation has corrupted the Israeli society."

Many questions from the students, most of them evidently Arab.

Who will form the governing coalition in Israel? Who would he choose? Barghouti said: Barack Obama. That is the only hope for the Israelis. That Obama will now put actions behind his good gestures, the Mitchell appointment, and truly try to make a just settlement in Israel/Palestine now.

"We are exactly at that very specific point of the last chance for the two-state solution. It is closing." It is closing because Israel has committed itself to a policy of dispossession and Bantustanization of the Palestinian people, and it has so far succeeded. The apartheid wall, the security zone, the checkpoints that would make the map black if he showed every one of them– these are now matched in Gaza by a fresh act of ethnic cleansing, a buffer zone on Palestinian land along the northern and eastern borders of the strip where no house or tree or farm can be, only Israeli forces.

The Palestinians agreed to accept less than half of what the UN gave them in '48 but they will not accept the Bantustans and apartheid. No people would. "Action must be taken for the sake of both peoples…It is about the future of both peoples… There can be no peace with this apartheid system in this place… It has to be a real state. It has to be a real sovereign and democratic state where we are entitled, as Dianne Feinstein said at the inaguration of President Obama–the root of democracy is the right of people to freely choose their leaders. We have to choose our leaders."
Barghouti is for a two state solution because it is "accessible." He wants his daughter to grow up with some sort of hope. He doesn’t want her to grow up in a long violent struggle against apartheid.
I heard only one question from an Israel supporter. What is to be done about the many rockets? Barghouti decried the rockets, but he pointed out (as Sam Husseini did here) that the Six-Day war began when Israel attacked three countries because Egypt closed down access to one port by blockading the straits of Tiran. Gaza has been thoroughly blockaded for years.

My great pity at events like these is a Jewish one. Barghouti the doctor and the young Palestinian intellectuals in the Ivy League space, cramming it, feeling both empowered and victimized, reminded me of nothing so much as my Jewish experience in the Ivy League more than 30 years ago. Also Barghouti spoke feelingly of Jews. He has been in the States four days, and has had several arguments in the media with Israeli supporters. One of these arguments will be on CNN, Fareed Zakaria’s show, this Sunday.

What drives these interlocutors crazy is when he invokes Martin Luther King and Gandhi. "It is so difficult, and I can understand this from a psychological perspective, it is so difficult, for the Jewish people, who have endured such a horrible thing like the Holocaust, and who have endured such horrible things like the suffering of the pogroms of Russia, or the Inquisition of Spain, or somewhere else– so much suffering, I accept that. But it is so difficult for them to accept the fact that today they are sitting exactly on the chair of the oppressor. And that's why when you speak about that all you get is…'No it is not that!' No it is you. It's time to look in the mirror…It is disrespectful of the victims of the Holocaust to have such a behavior. And that is why Edward Said spoke about us becoming the victims of the victims."

He closed with a summons to Diaspora Palestinians and all those who support them, to be a movement against what he termed the number-one injustice in world affairs now. Help us in our struggle, he said. "Freedom was never given. You have to fight for it. We the Palestinians are determined to be free. And we will be free!"

I took the elevator downstairs. A Jewish girl (I can tell) had her cellphone out, was reporting to a friend about the event.  "Well he said a number of inaccuracies. He said that Gaza is the most densely populated place on the earth. When it's only the third or fourth." To this is reduced the tradition that gave the world Maimonides, Spinoza, Arendt, and Mailer.
(Phil Weiss)

Related posts:

  1. Barghouti to Obama: Uphold your values – End Israeli apartheid
  2. Mustafa Barghouthi – ‘The choice is Israel’s: two states or apartheid’
  3. Mustafa Barghouti, star of ‘60 Minutes,’ to speak at Columbia on Thursday
  4. Israel’s Leading Publisher States that His Country Is an ‘Apartheid State’
  5. Barghouti (and his shadow, Lieberman)

{ 35 comments }

1 Sam February 12, 2009 at 11:46 pm

Chris — proud yet?

2 Kapo February 12, 2009 at 11:55 pm

It's nice you can sniff put Jews, Phil. Your friends will find that a useful skill. Toi might even, finally, won tjeor approcal!

3 Karlheinz February 12, 2009 at 11:58 pm

Obama to Barghouti:
Don't start wars with people willing to fight back.

4 Steve r February 13, 2009 at 12:03 am

LOL
Imagine having to listen to that guy whine just to keep track of inaccuracies. No one cares what Palestinians have to say except Jews and Jew-haters.

5 Duscany February 13, 2009 at 12:15 am

There must be a full moon somewhere because the trolls are out tonight.

6 Nina February 13, 2009 at 1:21 am

Imagine having to read to these Israeli supporters whine just to keep track of denials and lies.
People do care.

7 Suzanne February 13, 2009 at 1:33 am

Is Hamas afraid of Avigdor?

Something sure changed their minds…

8 Dan Kelly February 13, 2009 at 1:56 am

Thank you Phil.

9 anonn February 13, 2009 at 2:00 am

The last truce or agreed lull: The immediate trigger to the three week war on Gaza was the Israeli raid that killed six Hamas gunmen
inside the Gaza Strip on November 4, 2008. This was done while the USA ("Big Brother") was preoccupied at the polls.

10 Dan Kelly February 13, 2009 at 2:26 am

Gaza: Death's Laboratory

Erik Fosse, a Norwegian cardiologist, worked in Gaza hospitals during the recent war. "It was as if they had stepped on a mine," he says of certain Palestinian patients he treated. "But there was no shrapnel in the wound. Some had lost their legs. It looked as though they had been sliced off. I have been to war zones for 30 years, but I have never seen such injuries before."

Dr. Fosse was describing the effects of a U.S. "focused lethality" weapon that minimizes explosive damage to structures while inflicting catastrophic wounds on its victims. But where did the Israelis get this weapon? And was their widespread use in the attack on Gaza a field test for a new generation of explosives?

"There is a strong suspicion…that Gaza is now being used as a test laboratory for new weapons."

Gaza: Death's Laboratory

11 Citizen February 13, 2009 at 4:39 am

Uncle Sam gave them a whole bunch of stuff in the four months or so preceeding their attack on Gaza. It's no secret the congress & the military-industrial-complex partner with Israel; the real life testing of new weapons by this partnership has been going on a long time now. Congress likes it that way too.

12 chris berel February 13, 2009 at 6:56 am

"And most of the glass in Gaza was shattered, but glass is not allowed in either, as a "strategic material." Windows are covered with plastic.

Of course, this kind of horror requires analysis,"

You must be kidding. Lack of glass to replace broken windows is a "kind of horror"? No wonder the world sits up and ignors the Palestinains and their self-induced plight.

13 Judy February 13, 2009 at 7:32 am

Thanks Phil.

You know you've hit paydirt when the loon birds all sing the same tune.

Just like African Americans, just like South Africans, the people of Palestine will be free.

14 Citizen February 13, 2009 at 8:07 am

The Palestinians now have their own "night of broken glass," and a much worse one at that. What goes around comes around, eventually. We should be able to speed up "eventually" with the aid of video clips on YouTube, the internet, etc

15 Susie Kneedler February 13, 2009 at 8:29 am

Thanks, Phil.

Mustafa Barghouti's account puts reporters like Ethan Bronner (NYTimes) to shame–and shames all of us who settle for such censored news that Bronner and Gross dish out.

http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/01/terry-gross-interviewed-times-ethan-bronner-yesterday.html

16 Steve r February 13, 2009 at 8:55 am

I love the idea of people being used as "target dummies"! Plenty of real assholes to ice: the IDF doesn't need practice.
Someone ought to tell Barghouti that, since every Palestinian seems to have a 6 megapixel Israeli camera phone, one of them might take a picture of that. After all, as the ads say, you can learn a lot from a dummy!

17 Suzanne February 13, 2009 at 9:03 am

I wonder if Paliwood is going to produce its own Leni Reifenstahl.

18 Samuel February 13, 2009 at 9:45 am


Suzanne, you're just like those Holocaust deniers aren't you? Do you genuinely believe what you say? Or do you just repeat stuff like this because you love to sound stupid? Does your victimized psyche really think that Palestinians have a better propaganda machine than that of the Israelis? Do the pictures of burnt children not have any effect on you (even though they're A-rabs)? How much of a racist / spineless pig can you be to continue regurgitating this garbage?

All of these are rheotorical questions, and I'm obviously not expecting any dignified response from you. No one needs to pick sides here to acknowledge the human suffering, but for people like you, it's only human suffering if it happens to the Jews.

19 Colin Murray February 13, 2009 at 9:55 am

This is straight-backed work, Phil. Unvarnished truth makes the barbarians nervous. Bravo.

20 Eurosabra February 13, 2009 at 10:17 am

Mustafa Barghouti is actually one of the few Palestinian politicians the broader Israeli public might trust. If he can win a broad mandate for something resembling the Geneva Accord or the Saudi proposal, disarm Hamas or persuade them to give up terror and definitively accept a two-state solution, and stop the rockets, he would be the ultimate Palestinian statesman.

He's probably just another PLO Trojan Horse hemming and hawing enough about his final goals to get whatever he can in negotiation and then continue the war for Israel's destruction, though.

21 pulaski February 13, 2009 at 10:51 am

eurosabra: He's probably just another PLO Trojan Horse.

Why would it be wrong to work towards a two state interim while still having a long term goal for a single democratic state? This seems exactly reasonable. I can understand zionists wanting to keep it at a two state phase, but then they should work for that.

Anyway, thanks Phil. I appreciate what you are doing. It gets a bit old wading past the comments from the couple of tireless rabid racists so I don't often check the comments lately. But thanks.

22 Suzanne February 13, 2009 at 10:59 am

Pulaski–why doesn't the US and Mexico become a single nation?

Or how about Iran and Iraq? How cool would that be?

23 Suzanne February 13, 2009 at 11:02 am

I think Russia, Poland, and Azerbaijan should become one nation. Triple cool!

24 Eurosabra February 13, 2009 at 11:20 am

One-state requires a marginalization of violence in both Israeli and Palestinian political cultures that has never existed yet in the Middle East, on a par with South Africa's new democratic constitution. It presupposes a condition of peace and mutual acceptance that would take generations to attain and that a gradual symbiosis of the two states (via the proposed 1947 customs union, for example) might render unnecessary anyway. What people fear is that Barghouti speaks of the South Africa of Mandela but what he really wants is the Algeria of the FIS/GIA. He is, however, currently the only Palestinian politician besides Sari Nusseibeh who recognizes (at least in theory) that Israeli Jews have some rights as a polity.

25 Sam February 13, 2009 at 11:37 am

>> Pulaski–why doesn't the US and Mexico become a single nation?

Suzanne, hon, and what's the price of tea in china? Fact is, Mexico is a nation and the US is nation. Fact is, Israel is a nation and Palestine is not a nation. Why you compare a nation<->nation situation to a to nation<->non-nation situation is utterly beyond me. (Actually, it's not — you're merely trying to be disruptive. Nothing like a little struggle!)

Israelis have two choices: 1. Do not further obstruct the Palestinians inherent right to a sovereign nation that answers to its people; 2. Grant them basic human/civil rights within the context of the existing sovereign.

To do neither and to let the situation persist for a another year/month/day/moment is utterly unacceptable.

26 Citizen February 13, 2009 at 12:53 pm

@suzanne

Jodie Foster has been working on a Leni R movie for a long time. Let's all pray one day she can somehow get passed Jewish Hollywood. Leni
is a genius, a grand innovator in the art of film as every art student knows.

And, as Sam tells you, quit comparing a non-state with a state. BTW, how can a non-state entity "recognize" Israel in the first place?

27 Eurosabra February 13, 2009 at 1:30 pm

Either they have a National Authority or they do not. If they do, it can recognize Israel prior to assuming sovereign power over the West Bank and Gaza as part of a peace agreement. If they do not, they are a tribe, to be governed by village councils, as the 1980s village leagues plan had it.

28 Sam February 13, 2009 at 1:48 pm

[The PA] can recognize Israel prior to assuming sovereign power over the West Bank and Gaza as part of a peace agreement.

Why would/should/could the PA recognize a country that has tellingly never defined its own boarders? For it begs the question: *What* Israel is being recognized?

Alas, Eurosabra — I look forward to your posts demanding that Israel define its own borders. Surely, they are the only country in the world that remains coy on an issue as central as this.

29 Eurosabra February 13, 2009 at 3:49 pm

The borders with Egypt and Jordan are set by treaty. The border with Lebanon is the UN recognized Blue Line, pending a peace settlement, which Syria and Lebanon do not recognize. The border with Syria is the UN recognized Purple Line, or alternately the 1949 or 1923 Mandate Line, pending a peace settlement, which Syria does not recognize. The border with the West Bank is the UN recognized Green Line, pending a peace settlement, which the PA has not yet recognized.

Seems that the Arabs don't get to make war and try to move the borders to "nowhere"–Islamic Palestine from the river to the sea–and complain that the borders are undefined.

30 Eurosabra February 13, 2009 at 3:54 pm

The FRG/GDR borders and the GDR/Poland borders were cease-fire lines for 45 years (1945-1990) and that hindered neither national development nor peace, because the cease-fire was largely respected even though FRG/GDR did not recognize each other or respect each others' legitimacy.

But Jihad is eternal, so an Israel with or without the Occupied Palestinian Territories would still be too big for the PA (Hamas), as 1949-Israel or the 1921-Jewish Quarters of Jerusalem, Safed, and Ahuzat Bayit always were for Palestinian Islamists.

31 Ana Sanchez February 13, 2009 at 10:43 pm

How convenient that all the borders are "pending."

32 Eurosabra February 14, 2009 at 9:53 am

Ana,

It will be a great pity if the Jordan River becomes the permanent border because the Palestinians couldn't have a group like the Village Leagues or Barghouti's National Initiative sign on the dotted line for the Green Line in place of the PLO's "death of a thousand cuts" and Trojan Horse since 1993. Israel has not been fair either, but there are anti-Occupation Israelis, and far fewer, almost no, anti-terror Palestinians.

The Palestinian national movement continues to exist as an armed revolutionary movement mainly because it is NOT dangerous to Israel. If it becomes so, Israel will destroy it no matter the cost in international public relations. Meanwhile, on the ground, people are interdependent in fact in ways that make the continuing conflict a disaster. (cf. Palestinian patients' access to Jerusalem).

33 Eurosabra February 14, 2009 at 9:58 am

You're missing the point. The Arabs are keeping it that way.

34 Alice February 19, 2009 at 11:55 am

Yeah, right, the arabs are to blame. Geez, Euro, read some recent history of diplomatic arab attempts to make peace in the region.

35 Luc Hansen March 17, 2009 at 9:51 pm

The outline of a long term, as opposed to permanent, settlement have been in play on the Arab side for quite a while, certainly since the early 1980s.

The main components are: a return to the pre-June 1967 borders and a just settlement of the refugee situation, which may include limited return. In return, all Arab nations will consider the problem to be resolved.

The Palestinians, meanwhile, will hunker down for the permanent solution, a united state, courtesy of demographics and pressure for equal rights.

Israel understands all this, which is why it is desperately sabotaging any two-state settlement, opting instead for the solution Jews know all too well, concentration camps.

Eurosabra, it's a natural, but mistaken, human reflex to blame the victims. As Alice says, read some more. Ilan Pappe, Avi Shlaim, and check out the debate between Shlomo Ben-Ami and Norman Finkelstein at DemocracyNow or Finkelstein's homepage.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Marty Peretz also seems rattled by divestment initiative

Next post: Archbishop Desmond Tutu endorses Hampshire divestment action