Does a bear shit in the woods? Is the Pope Catholic?

If I might return to the theme of troll psychology, just once more – the reason they so often accuse people of being fascists, is in order to provide themselves with 'left cover'.

With their anti-fascist hats on, the zionist trolls can still get automatic cover from the entire jewish left, and I mean automatic. This is because the left is required by the right in jewish politics to be twice as anti-fascist as would be rational for it to be, in order to fend off accusations about its weak loyalty to jewish core values.

Back to business:

It has been expected that Israel will retain some of the settlements and that the Arabs will receive other land to make up for the loss. No requirement exists, other then in the minds of islamic fascist supporters, that Israel is required to relinquish all of the land attained in the defensive wars of 1967 and 1973.

I see you are trying to hide on another thread here. Before I get back to the question, twice-dodged, let's consider your latest brilliant non sequitor:

"No requirement exists, …, that Israel is required to relinquish all of the land attained in the defensive wars of 1967 and 1973."

You can wage a defensive war, or you can acquire land by war, but you can't acquire land in a defensive war, now, can you? I mean, think about it.

[Not that you care, but the UN also forbids acquiring land by war. Of course, in your mind, they are Islamic fanatics as well.]

When you've removed foot from mouth, please answer the question that you keep avoiding:

Do you support an investigation into alleged war crimes perpetrated by the IDF in Gaza? And if found guilty, do you support punishment according to the norms of international law?

In a way, I kinda wish there would be, by an impartial objective investigation team.

I'm pretty sure it would shut you hatemongers up for awhile.

BTW–I take it that suicide bombings and lobbing rockets into Israel are war crimes worthy of investigation too, right non-hypocrite?

Sam has already declared, on another thread, that Hamas is legally allowed to commit War Crimes. I don't know what law he is utilizing as he did not cite such.

I wonder when the leadership of Hamas will be indicted for war crimes and when they will go before the Hague.

Furthermore, within the two state paradigm, the proferred land swaps legitimise acquisition of territory by force and constructing 'facts on the ground', while opening the dor to 'transfer' – explicitly in the Lieberman version, slightly more subtly in Livni's.