The lobby resorts to financial blackmail again

It is important to register the fact that when Dershowitz cried out against the Hampshire College divestment resolution, he did so by calling on donors to withdraw contributions from Hampshire. This is an old story. When Walt and Mearsheimer published their paper denouncing the Israel lobby, the rabbi at Hillel told me that there would be financial retribution in fewer gifts to Harvard, where Stephen Walt teaches. Subsequently, the neocon New York Sun tried to build pressure on Robert Belfer, who endowed Walt's chair, to withdraw his support. When Lawrence Summers was forced out as Harvard's president, Martin Peretz said it was out of "anti-Israel and even
anti-Jewish animus"
and also threatened financial repercussions: "…[M]y own impression of
wealthy alumni who were once my students is that Summers made them more
generous… I know of at least three gifts in the $100 million range
that were very likely to materialize and now are dicey."
Money is an essential tool of the Israel lobby. Abba Eban wrote that Zionists got "fairly free access" to Truman in 1948 by making timely financial contributions to him. This tool has corrupted our politics. It's time to have the debate in an open and democratic manner.
(Anyone who says I'm a hypocrite because I'm supporting the financial instrument of divestment; there is a political tradition of sanctioning human rights abuses in foreign lands, and it is carried out transparently.
(Phil Weiss)

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in BDS, Gaza, Israel Lobby, Israel/Palestine, US Policy in the Middle East

{ 21 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. doug says:

    It is important to register the fact that when Dershowitz cried out against the Hampshire College divestment resolution, he did so by calling on donors to withdraw contributions from Hampshire. This is an old story.

    Duh. Goose, meet Gander.

    Complaining about a tactic you just cheered is a bit odd, no?

  2. LD says:

    antisemitism! holocaust! hitler! nazis! joooooooooos!!!!!

  3. Eva Smagacz says:

    Hopefully, the divestment from Hampshire in USA will come from 2% of USA community, and divestment from Israel apartheid will be 98% of the world community.

    This will clarify the message to both.

  4. Steve r says:

    People like Eva make me understand why we sold Poland to the Russkies after World War Two! I'd be happy to sell them out again, but I fear no one's buying!

  5. Jim Haygood says:

    Here's something we can ask Eva. There are many Polish prostitutes in Israel, and they are absolutely the cheapest (romanians, phillipinos, Vietnamese, Ukrainians are all much more expensive.) yet Polish cleaning women are the MOST expensive! Any ideas about why this is?

  6. Sword of Gideonthe point. says:

    How come divesting from Israel is the greatest thing in the world. But divesting from Hampshire college is some sort of horrific act.

  7. Samuel says:

    Great argument you make there Haygood. Completely ignore the discussion, and slander someone's race.

    To take your point further, I have to ask: How do you know all this? Was your mom a prostitute in Israel? or was she a cleaning lady? and where did she rank on the price scale?

    Sword, you either lack the logic, or you just want to sound stupid. Here's your answer: Israel is an apartheid occupier, Hampshire College is not.

  8. Crimson Ghost says:

    The resouces available to the Israel lobby have been greatly diminished by the ongoing collapse in the value of financial assets and real estate. Espcecially painful for the lobby is the massive downsizing of the heavily Jewish financial industry.

    So even the worst recession/depression and bear market since the 1930s does have its positives.

  9. cipher says:

    i see many vulgar antigentiles here. so where is our version of adl?

  10. Sword of Gideonthe point. says:

    Actually Eva is polack bitch but that's not really the point.

  11. Glenn Condell says:

    'Great argument you make there Haygood.'

    That wasn't the esteemed Mr Haygood Samuel; it was his odious doppelganger, who couldn't resist posting as 'himself' immediately below.

    Don't feed the troll. He is dying a natural death right now – these are the throes. It's ugly, but some of derive a certain satisfaction from them.

  12. Jim Haygood says:

    Sandy Stone! Good on ya, mate! I am very pleased to see you return. You simply must tell of all the latest gossip from Gumdsle!

  13. Dagon says:

    I seem to remember reading an article by the British historian Arnold Toynbee that he wrote in the 70s.In it he basicaly said that the palestinians will get justice,otherwise there will be hell, where they will go down and take the world with them .welcoe to your hell berel.The thing about us Arabs,is that we do not accept defeat. Never surrender.We will take a truce,hudana,tahdeah,ceasefire,whatever give us the time to come back and get our rigths.Got it sowrd?.Read some history.

  14. chris berel says:

    Is this a joke? You're serious? This is too funny. I don't care if you accept defeat or not. Until you grow up and act like a human, you will eat mud.

    Like some salt? I'll sell it to you at a fair price.

  15. Citizen says:

    Eva makes an innocuous comment, her hope that influential people here and around the world will end the occupation. She ASAP gets
    personally insulted by racists because she's apparently of Polish ethnic background. Are we in slum grade school? Why is it that
    the heavily-dominated Jewish Communists and the Hitler regime both attacked the Poles, even divided up Poland? Both committed great
    atrocities against the Poles. Polish jokes are always acceptable in polite circles, no matter the political POV. Jews are acutely sensitive
    to any joke made against Jews, indeed to anything at all, true or not, they may reflect badly on Jews. If you look over all of Eva's comments on this blog for a year or so, she has done nothing to earn the juvenile slurs against her apparent ethnic background–SOG has long been
    the chief culprit, operating both in the SOG alias, in his usual array of sock puppets, and in the name of real people who comment here
    regularly.

    Thank you, Eva, for your many helpful and restrained comments over the years. And especially for not stooping to respond to all the blatant racism and potty talk directed your way by knee-jerk zionist infants to deflect objective discussion of the serious issues presented daily by Phil.

  16. An understanding of Zionism requires a good comprehension of Jewish political economy from the middle of the 19th century until today. See The Economics of Judonia.

  17. chris berel says:

    Utilizing the antisemitic bullshit spewed by Joachim will not contribute to understanding anything but the basis of Joachim's racist hatred.

  18. lurker says:

    Joachim is not mere malicious bluster. His POV and documentation is easily available on his blog, to the right here on your screen as somebody pointed out.

    "antisemitic bullshit spewed"–nothing like masturbating with yourself, chris–again, as others on this blog have repeatedly revealed.

  19. Thom says:

    @sword

    Or whoever was posting under that name. There is no call for that sort of thing. Eva is an idiot because she herself is an idiot. There is nothing wrong with being Polish. Some of the brightest people in history were Poles. Like Copernicus (Mikołaj Kopernik) and Marie Curie (nee Sklodowska), the only person in history to win Nobel prizes in two sciences (physics and chemistry).

    The mere fact that Eva happens to be both Polish and stupid does not mean that you should blame her stupidity on her Polishness. Just like the mere fact that a particular Jew happens to be both Jewish and greedy does not mean you should blame his greed on his Jewishness.

  20. Alice says:

    Thom, nobody posts here in SOGs name, but SOG aka Bill Pearlman. SOG's comments always are the same, and the nature of them you have just summarized. I allow other readers here to see if your
    characterization of Eva's comments as "stupid" are so. BTW, Eva never calls people or their comments
    "stupid" –not even SOG's.

Leave a Reply