This is standard operating procedure for Zionists and Israel apologists. They make it seem like Israel is always singled out, when in fact the exact opposite is true: Israel gets the best treatment in the world (I am talking about in mainstream news sources, of course).

(2) I thought "Stockholm syndrome" referred to a condition in which hostages fall in love with, or otherwise emotionally identify with, their kidnappers. If I am right, then what the hell is the comparison saying? That 'the West' has been shanghaied by oil sheikhs? Give us a break already.

(3)0 Stertorous breathing, red face, etc.; i wonder if Foxman's an alcoholic.

The fact that Phil and others can even make a claim for supporting the Palestinian position is more a direct result of leftists/liberals/dissenters/whatever-you-want-to-call-them in Israel than of Israel's conduct. Of course, you all will disagree. Fine. But it is these "Ha'aretz Jews" who have given your cause a voice, and without them, Phil wouldn't have all those Jews to cite in support of his views, and you all wouldn't have Phil to cite for yours.

It's hard to find another "people," a segment of which is so committed to their own destruction. God's will, I suppose….

@Dan Kelly: Perhaps both are true — Israel gets favorable treatment and, at the same time and perhaps as a result, is always singled out.

It is simple, they must stop supporting those stealing the properety of their neighbour.

John

Do you read books? Writing teachers force students to use physical details to create character and amplify what they say. Physical appearance is paramount.

I remember Foxman from my NYC days. Judging from what I just read about him above, he's got to fight fast and furious everyday to keep the threat alive or he wont get the donations that justify his occupation of the ADL.

Now, Phil, you know that it isn't true that "everyone despises it". Who is "everyone"? Are you using the old Marxist notion that "the masses" that you talk about are really "the people whose opinion counts…i.e. those who agree with us"? Recent polls taken AFTER the Gaza war say that something like 70% of Americans support Israel 17% support the Palestinians. So who is "everybody"? "Everybody" it turns out is Phil, the 10 members of his fan club who regularly post comments here agreeing with him, some other "progressives" like Tony Karon, MJ Rosenberg and Richard Silverstein, and people of Arab or Muslim origin whom I don't expect to love Israel.

I recall that the Nazis did not supress Zionist publications and advocates, in part because Goebbels found it so useful to quote them.

Now I expect him to quit pestering Vdare, American Renaissance, FAIR, and Kevin MacDonald. We're nationalists, okay? Just like you!

What the Israelis are doing isn't any different from what conquering peoples have done to conquered peoples throughout history; it's just that the world has (for the most part) decided that that's no longer acceptable. We now have ideas of universal human rights and international law, we have the United Nations, and so on. This leaves Israel and its supporters with a time problem; the world has passed their ideas by and they can't recognize or accept that. Just as Israel wants to pretend that pre-Diaspora Jewish possession of Palestine is still relevant, Foxman wants to pretend that the pre-20th-century moral perspective that supported imperialism and colonialism is still applicable.