Here's an update on Tristan Anderson's condition. He's unconscious following surgery in a good Israeli hospital, and will be kept unconscious for days to aid healing. His family's getting a lot of support, and is headed over there.
On Monday at 4 p.m. in San Franciso,there's going to be a demo in solidarity with Anderson at the Israeli consulate.
Henry Norr of California writes:
How about adding some info about the theft of Ni'lin lands by the Israelis? The ISM's quick summary:
Most of the MSM coverage of this story at best includes the infuriating AP line that Palestinians object to the Wall because it "juts into the West Bank," as if they're all just cartographers or diplomats, not real people being robbed of their livelihoods.
Along the same lines, there's a good factsheet entitled "Ni'lin – A Struggle for Existence," put together last year by the Grassroots Palestinian Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign.
As to the four
Palestinians killed in Ni'lin, I'm quoting again from the ISM:
Starhawk also wrote about these victims in a moving post.
Related posts:
- Key facts in Tristan Anderson shooting
- On anniversary of their daughter’s killing, the Corries are thinking about Tristan Anderson and Palestinian dignity
- And they ask, where is the Palestinian Gandhi?
- ‘Washington Post’ buries the Tristan Anderson shooting story
- No one is accountable in maiming of Tristan Anderson






{ 5 comments }
It's difficult to keep track of these village names – Ni'lin or Bi'lin.
But it's not difficult to understand these statistics:
Ni'lin:
1948 (After establishment of Israel) – 57,000 dunums [228,000 acres]
1967 reduced to 33,000 dunums in 1967
2008 currently is 10,000 dunums
2009 7,500 [30,000 acres] dunums after the construction of the Wall
Doesn't take much to realise that Israel wants land, not peace.
Note: This land is very dry – not desert, but nearly so. Israel doesn't want the land, but the aquifers under it.
Wait for Pajamas Media (or similar) to start calling him 'Tristan the Can'…
We will give Phil's phools proper credit.
to Richard: You write "This land is very dry – not desert, but nearly so. Israel doesn't want the land, but the aquifers under it."
I don't want to downplay Israel's eagerness to control the aquifers, but anyone who's spent time on the West Bank, and specifically in the western part of the West Bank, near the Wall, in the villages that have put up the biggest resistance to it – Ni'lin, Bil'in, Budrus, Jayyous, etc. – can tell you that the land in question is anything but desert. In fact, it's some of the most fertile agricultural land in the whole region.
That's not to say the Israelis are after it so their farmers can grow more oranges and olives – these areas are within easy commuting distance of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, so the economic interest group with the biggest stake is developers who want to build settlements. But I think the strongest motive for the Israelis is actually not anything positive for themselves, but to drive out the Palestinians by making their lives impossible or at least unbearable.
don't confuse witty with the facts–he's an accountant's accountant and self-declared proud zionist living
in relative luxury protected by non-jewish police and military overseas. he calls it live & let live.
Comments on this entry are closed.