Jewish Nazis calling Muslims Nazis: Zionizing Muslims via Interfaith Dialogue

Jews Dehumanizing Non-Jews: Jewish Zionist Dehumanization of Non-Jews

The experience of a state of harrassment to a state of harrassment is a real experience, whether you look at it through the eyes of "that objective reality does not match up with the second experience", or not.

And, its not a fantasy. Its a real experience.

Its similar to the Palestinian description of chains of persecution at the hands of different communities, or even different Israelis, or different Jews.

Maybe there's a common link between one Jew's treatment of Palestinians, the state's treatment of Palestinians, and another Jew's. Or maybe not.

It doesn't make their experience, and then attitude less real, just less objective.

But, that exactly describes the obnoxious vanity of our American assimilated judgement of an "other".

Art is the RELATIONSHIP between the subjective and the objective. If there is no interaction, no communication, no recognition that it is communication, then its just expression rather than communication.

The VALIDITY of the subjective, of the Jews', MUST be a part of the attendee's experience, and not ONLY the dismissal of Jews' imagined experience.

Its like having a dream, and intentionally only interpreting the importance of one character. Its HALF the lesson of the dream.

All art by definition is subjective, and so more or less objective. Dali thought he had a connection to physics. He even tried to show it–look at his first and second renditions of The Persistence Of Memory.

What do you mean by "The VALIDITY of the subjective, of the Jews', MUST be a part of the attendee's experience, and not ONLY the dismissal of Jews' imagined experience"? I assume you mean the converse also, relating to the Palestinian experience. Is that right? Seems you attack the poem for dismissing the Jews' imagined experience–if so, how so? If not, what do you mean? Are you asking for Churchill to now
write a poem called Seven Palestinian Children? She may well do this. If not, please clarify your comment. Thanks. Exactly how does the poem annoy you, confuse you–or do you think it's very good?

If you only value the condemnation, then you've seen nothing.

whoops, I made an anti-Semitic statement. Go to the back of the motherfucking class, Rowan.

cartharsis. forbidden. why?

The more subjective it gets, the more universal. That's the crux.

I have lost sight of neocon's handling or treatment of the arts. I have to admit it partly made me slightly suspicious. Irving Kristol wrote an essay on the sixties counterculture. The huge desire for the arts he saw there as a trace to the ultimate evil, I have never witnessed during the times I met all the leftists during the late sixties and early seventies. The vast majority then had a very narrow utility approach to the arts. Political indoctrination.