We have been following the story of Silwan on this site. It is a Palestinian neighborhood located right outside of Jerusalem's old city, and a strategic area that Israel wants to control as part of its colonization of the West Bank. The fight over Silwan has received some media attention here in the US, but it is being following much more closely in the rest of the world. Here are two recent stories about Silwan, the first by Clayton Swisher for Al Jazeera English and the second by Akiva Eldar in Ha'aretz:
The article in Ha'aretz covers much of the same territory in Eldar's article "The very eye of the storm." The story does of good job of providing an overview of the conflict. He begins and ends the article with disturbing stories about challenges and fears Silwan resident Jawad Siam lives with as Israel continues to take control of the area. The article begins:
Jawad Siam pulled out a brochure issued by the Jerusalem municipality heralding development plans for his place of residence, the village of Silwan in East Jerusalem. He pointed to the map in the brochure, where the neighborhood's streets were marked. "You see this, Hashiloah Road?" he asked. "All these years, it was called Ein Silwan Street. 'Ma'alot Ir David' Street? That was Wadi Helwa Street. The street next to it, 'Malkitzedek,' used to be Al-Mistar Street."
From two small rooms, not far from the Old City walls, Siam and his colleagues in Silwan's Ein Helwa neighborhood committee, as well as a small group of Jewish friends, are waging a tenacious struggle on one of the world's most volatile battlefields. As he sees it, the "conversion" of the street names, the settling of Jews there with the encouragement of rightist organizations, and the municipality's intention to demolish dozens of buildings in the neighborhood, are merely a prelude to an eventual transfer plan. The real goal, he believes, is the expulsion of Ein Helwa's 5,000 residents, part of a goal of reducing the Palestinian presence in the area.
And ends with:
This week, in a small room in the local community center, Jawad met with several Israeli archaeologists who offer tourists with guided tours meant to exposed them to the bleak reality in Jerusalem. They composed an open letter to Supreme Court Justice Miriam Naor, who turned down their request that she issue an injunction against a continuation of the "development works" in the neighborhood, which they believe are designed to improve the lives of the Jewish residents. She determined that it would be unsafe to stop the work, now that it is under way.
"Imagine how you would feel," they wrote the justice, "if one day you were to fall under the power of a group of new residents, whose civil status is higher than your own and that of your family, and who enjoy heavyweight economic backing, including that of the municipal authorities, and have guards stationed outside their homes day and night who roam the streets, armed, and frighten your children."
a group of jewish thugslugs, back in the 90's, waited for a palestinian family in silwan to go the market, broke into/ occupied their home. still their defecating.
umm. silwan is the site of David's palace. It's excavations at each stage prove a millenial jewish presence in the area. it is a goldmine of archeology. any state in the world would seize the area under eminent domain rules.
You are a left wing lunatic. "modern" silwan is about 100 years old. it's as "palestinian" as New York's Atlantic Avenue.
Get a life.
Ya, it's such a sacred place, that's why Israelis are looking to build a theme park there…
Err, my house could be built on an archaeological goldmine, but no way in hell would I allow the government to take it, nor would they be allowed to without being dragged to the courts.
The protection of private property is the cornerstone of a modern economy. I very much doubt you'd feel the same way of it was the remains of a 7th century mosque underneath some Jewish homes.
ba these archaeological sites show very, very little evidence of ancient Jewish life. Even your sacred 'wailing wall' is now understood to be a wall built by the Christian Roman Emperor Julian in about 500 ad to be the foundations of a Christian Church. The wall of Herod was located elsewhere and probably completely dismantled by the Romans in 100ad.
Face it, the Hebrews presence in that land was very temporary and left little evidence behind.
Very few artifacts support the Hebrew biblical narrative in any way.
link to en.wikipedia.org
the ancient, middle, and modern jewish narritives are 99 – 100% fiction, fraud, manufactured.
only diseased minds believe anything re jewish history up to present. the more intense the disease the more fanatical the belief.
Err, my house could be built on an archaeological goldmine, but no way in hell would I allow the government to take it, nor would they be allowed to without being dragged to the courts.
The protection of private property is the cornerstone of a modern economy. I very much doubt you'd feel the same way of it was the remains of a 7th century mosque underneath some Jewish homes.
Posted by: Shafiq | April 17, 2009 at 03:37 PM
Eminent domain. You'll be paid a full price
The power of eminent domain itself presupposes a legitimate "public purpose." If Chris Berel wasn't so ignorant, he'd know that issue is very much a hot potato in US courts right now. Further,
his stated stance on his hypothetical own house built on an archaeological goldmine mirrors exactly the Palestinian stance–too bad the Israeli Supreme Court is biased; it recently ignored
Turkish land title records in it's latest very discriminatory ruling against arabs claiming title.