Comments on: What does AIPAC mean when it calls for a ‘viable Palestinian state’? And does Obama agree?

By: Jacobwolfen

Jacobwolfen — Sun, 10 May 2009 11:25:52 +0000

Most powerful nation on earth is 2-bit? That would make the Arab world worthless.

By: Shafiq

Shafiq — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:16:23 +0000

'hostile Arab refugees' Yes, because every Arab is a terrorist, right? Why not talk to Hamas and demand a permanent peace then?

By: Shafiq

Shafiq — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:14:22 +0000

What offer exactly? The only offer currently on the table (As far as I know) is the Arab Peace Plan, which Israel is delaying on.

By: 5 dancing shlomos

5 dancing shlomos — Sat, 09 May 2009 14:22:12 +0000

uncle sam, usa? neither exists. aipacistan (lobro at xymphora) is correct name for this 2-bit state

By: Observer

Observer — Sat, 09 May 2009 14:05:23 +0000

The real question is how long will Uncle Sam support Israel's intact recipe for eternal war on earth? Time to end enabling the mental patient , time to take that patient off the public streets as a danger to self and others.

By: Jacobwolfen

Jacobwolfen — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:56:30 +0000

After reading hundreds of posts on this sorry blog, it is obvious that the 10 year plan is music to Phil and Adam's ears.

By: thedhimmi

thedhimmi — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:29:41 +0000

Terrific article in the IHT. "The Times conducted a five-hour interview with Hamas leader Khaled Meshal at his Damascus headquarters. Mirabile dictu, they're offering a peace plan with a two-state solution. Except. The offer is not a peace but a truce that expires after 10 years. Meaning that after Israel has fatally weakened itself by settling millions of hostile Arab refugees in its midst, and after a decade of Hamas arming itself within a Palestinian state that narrows Israel to eight miles wide -- Hamas restarts the war against a country it remains pledged to eradicate. There is a phrase for such a peace: the peace of the grave." " target="_blank">http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090509/COL... To the Phil's,Adam's, Martillo's of the world this is a suitable solution. Fortunately Israel will never accept it.

By: JES49

JES49 — Sat, 09 May 2009 06:24:28 +0000

You see, Adam, no nation really has the right to demand a "viable" state any more than a nation can demand the right for "existence" or the inherent right for "security" of its state. In all these cases, it is up to the people of that state to make the state "viable" (or to ensure its "existence" or its "security"). There are many states in the world smaller, or more resource starved, or more fragmented that what the Palestinians will probably wind up being offered. The question is, will they be wise enough this time to accept the offer, or will they continue demanding "viability".

By: RowanBerkeley

RowanBerkeley — Sat, 09 May 2009 05:19:07 +0000

AIPAC is approving the notion of Bantustans, quite cynically, taking as part of the definition thereof that Bantustans are like Potemkin villages, they are basically shams or facades. I doubt they would deny this, behind closed doors, but the opposition to this pseudo-solution has saved them the trouble of defining it explicitly themselves — all they have to do is not deny the opposition's description of it as such.

By: DICKERSON3870

DICKERSON3870 — Sat, 09 May 2009 04:58:28 +0000

FOR NETANYAHU'S DAD - Artist: Stevens, Ray Song: Ahab the Arab Let me tell you about Ahab the Arab The sheik of the burning sand He had emeralds and rubies just drippin’ off ‘a him And a ring on every finger of his hand He wore a big ol’ turban wrapped around his head And a scimitar by his side And, every evenin’, about midnight He’d jump on his camel named Clyde, and ride…. SOURCE - " target="_blank">http://www.metrolyrics.com/ahab-the-arab-lyrics-r...