Comments on: Foxman gained privileged access to UC school administrators in pressing ‘anti-Semitism’ case against Jewish critic of Israel

By: rykart

rykart — Sun, 03 May 2009 19:15:03 +0000

In the United States, a racist, violent murderer writes a book bragging about his exploits and becomes a hero and presidential candidate. Furthermore, the criminal gang he belonged to are still in business, spreading horror, suffering and death all over the world. The German Nazis lost the war. The American Nazis won. The rest is lies.

By: blackie

blackie — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:59:07 +0000

They can also use Hasbara talking points policy in their corporate mission statements and business mandate explanations. Good case study, no?

By: data

data — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:52:46 +0000

Similarly to some significant degree, was the identification of early communism with the heavy disproportion of Jew leadership in that movement which scared the heck out of the West.

By: MRW

MRW — Sun, 03 May 2009 01:51:38 +0000

Something is screwing up the comments. This comment was in reply to Dalybean.

By: Duscany

Duscany — Sun, 03 May 2009 01:17:58 +0000

I think it is to establish the principle in this country (as is the case in much of Europe) that some things are so awful you aren't allowed to say them. And if you do you lose your job or go to jail.

By: Duscany

Duscany — Sun, 03 May 2009 01:13:36 +0000

Free speech includes the right to be wrong. We can't allow agents of a foreign power to get American professors fired because those agents think the professors got their facts wrong. When I was in college many years ago one of the school's most esteemed professors gave the freshman orientation speech. He said that if we in the freshman class weren't confused and angry in two months over what we heard in the classroom then he and his fellow professors weren't doing their jobs right. Nowadays if a professor took that same attitude, he'd be fired for hurting students' feelings or denying them an equal educational opportunity. Sometimes you can't open up a person's mind unless you shock him with the truth. And some times, as in the case of the two Santa Barbara students who wrote letters, he won't like it. If a student doesn't want to learn anything new or disturbing he ought not to go to college in the first place.

By: MRW

MRW — Sun, 03 May 2009 01:12:13 +0000

Indian business students snap up copies of Mein Kampf Sales of Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler's autobiography and apologia for his anti-semitism, are soaring in India where business students regard the dictator as a management guru. " target="_blank">http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/04/... APRIL 23, 2009

By: MRW

MRW — Sun, 03 May 2009 01:03:45 +0000

I agree with Jim Byers. What is the BFD? If the Holocaust is true, why do you feel the need to censor those who say it's not or whatever it is they say? They're not entitled? Under our laws? Why not? As for Mein Kampf, it's the hottest marketing manual in India right now. Flying off the newsstands…reported last week. Dont believe me? Google it.

By: jim byers

jim byers — Sun, 03 May 2009 00:05:50 +0000

So what is the BFD with Holocaust denial? Why is it a crime? Who is hurt, outside of someone's feelings?

By: romm

romm — Sat, 02 May 2009 22:12:54 +0000

Phil you claim that any professor can promote his extreme opinions to his students in a public univercity regardless if his opinions are " Politically correct". According to this logic some other professor can email his students parts of Mein Campf or racist publications. Is it OK to promote a Holocoust denial in the name of a free speach? What is the differense between a free speach and a clever propaganda? Phil if you read this please anwer my question.