Jane Harman: I am a “warrior on behalf of our constitution”

by on May 4, 2009 8
0sharesFacebook
0tweetsTwitter
0stumbledStumbleUpon
0sharesReddit
0recommendGoogle

Phil posted yesterday on Jane Harman's comments at the AIPAC conference yesterday. Here is some video posted by TPM:

You can watch the full video on the AIPAC website.

About Adam Horowitz

Adam Horowitz is Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel Lobby, US Policy in the Middle East

{ 8 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. Jim Haygood says:
    May 4, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    Jane Harman's a 'warrior for the constitution' like I'm a warrior for zionism. Is it true that her purse is stuffed with condoms and soiled panties?

  2. MRW says:
    May 4, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    Pulse showcases David Bromwich's piece in which he mops up Harman, the NYT, teh Justice Dept, and AIPAC called "The AIPAC Case in Washington, Iraq, and Beyond." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/the-... [good cartoon] But it's missing the last two paragraphs on the original site HuffPo. I think it's devastating. Read this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/the-...

  3. dalybean says:
    May 5, 2009 at 12:42 am

    Jane says that cognitive dissonance is for the little people.

  4. kathleen says:
    May 5, 2009 at 2:27 am

    Can anyone find just where it is in the constitution that says that it is perfectly acceptable to make deals with foreign agents and interfere with Dept of Justice trials for committee seats. Jane Harman's pr person is working over time "warrior" on behalf of the constitution. Horse shit more like "traitor" to the constitution

  5. israeliscrap says:
    May 5, 2009 at 4:27 am

    Just more Jewish lies!

  6. Paul says:
    May 5, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    FISA already had an approved wiretap on Harmon's tail, so they already suspected her as a willing party to engage in illegal action.

  7. Marion says:
    May 5, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    In Congress We Trust…Not The former FBI translator and whistleblower suggests blackmail may be at the heart of Congressional refusal to bring accountability and oversight to its own members – such as both Hastert and Harman – in matters of espionage and national security Guest Editorial by Sibel Edmonds Exclusive to The BRAD BLOG… http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22554...

  8. Peaceful_Idiot says:
    May 6, 2009 at 3:10 am

    Great article by Philip Giraldi, former CIA officer, about Harman, on Antiwar.com http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/05/04/ig...

    Ignore AIPAC at America’s Peril by Philip Giraldi, May 05, 2009 What do Charles Freeman and Jane Harman have in common? Nothing, apart from the fact that they are both involved in the truly ugly side of the Israel lobby’s activity in the United States and, for that reason, had their stories dropped by the mainstream media in record time. Harman’s story broke on April 19 and was on life support by the 24th. Freeman’s story had slightly more legs to it only because his withdrawal from his nomination to head the National Intelligence Council on March 10 was preceded by a three-week barrage of vicious ad hominem attacks from the media and the usual suspects in Congress. After he resigned, his story was allowed to die, ending as far as the mainstream media was concerned on March 14 with a coup de grace from Republican Congressman Frank Wolf of Virginia, who claimed in a Washington Post op-ed that the Israel lobby had nothing to do with his opposition to Freeman’s appointment. Wolf has reportedly received $72,000 from pro-Israel PACs, more than any other Virginia congressman except Eric Cantor, something that he chose not to mention. If one were to ask a reasonably well-informed American citizen about either Harman or Freeman, one would most likely draw a blank. This is because they have been airbrushed out of the collective political consciousness almost as effectively as the pictures of Stalin’s rivals were removed from group photos in Red Square. The mainstream media, which is where most Americans still get their news, has trivialized their stories and has no desire to grapple with issues like Israeli espionage and the establishment of a de facto Israeli loyalty test for the holders of high office. Corruption of the U.S. political system by a small country 5,000 miles away is of no interest to Fox, NBC, CBS, and ABC, not to mention their newsprint counterparts.

    Good start…

Leave a Reply