Comments on: Ackerman and Wexler flipflop on settlements

By: LeaNder22

LeaNder22 — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:08:16 +0000

I can't reply to the above. So I do it here. You don't need to be a wizzard to see that I responded to this: On the other hand, Phil might do us all a favor and find a non-Jew to work with on his blog too. Is it that hard? If you don't like what Phil and Adam publish or write why don't you simply move on and read a non-Jewish blog. There should be quite a few out there.

By: LeaNder22

LeaNder22 — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:02:09 +0000

bla, bla, bla. I glad I don't have to live in your Christian America. You and your mindset may at one point decide that since I like people not according to their religion, I must be possessed by the devil, which needs to be exorcised. I witnessed the case of a girl that didn't survive the exorcism, and I don't think that funny or has anything to do with Christian religion. It's a relict of the middle ages. Can you show me were exorcism or criticism or witch hunting or inquisition was propagated by Christ? And isn't he the founder of the Christian faith?

By: Citizen

Citizen — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:54:36 +0000

This is a great suggestion. The guy is a weasel.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:53:09 +0000

But it's ok to have forcefully have removed 700,000 although they had nothing to do with the Shoah? And all those land grabs via settlements have been great for 40 years? Yeah, we know, those dispossessed Palestinian arabs have a right to pursue title claim in an Israeli court. LOL. You can't sell us your Brooklyn Bridge, Witty. And we won't sell you Manhattan for some wampum beads.

By: LeaNder22

LeaNder22 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:13:55 +0000

Very good article by Gershom. I haven't read his book so far, but what he shows is what must be on the mind of every thinking person in the context. I also liked his article about Max' video, even the initial criticism I can accept, maybe since he goes on to show, yes there surely is such a phenomenon, and that was exactly why I think it was important: " target="_blank">http://southjerusalem.com/2009/06/racism-amalek-a... Richard's truism irritates me. Has anyone suggested that "all religious Jews are bigots"? If so it escaped me. The Magnus Zionist is one of the many, many sane voice among them. But in the settlements religious fervor seems to be intrinsically connected with politics. Up to the big conspiracy of the world against the Jews, the counter conspiracy tale to what Richard fears.

By: Ben Graber

Ben Graber — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:17:51 +0000

Wexler is obviously on both sides of this issue as usual. I would consider printing his two quotes simultaneously so the public is aware of his methodology. Telling both sides what they want to hear.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:08:44 +0000

Is your last sentence a good motto for the state of Israel?

By: Citizen

Citizen — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:05:43 +0000

So only a special interest group should have influence over what it stakes out as its own within that group even when the creed and deed & non-deed affect the larger whole?

By: syvanen

syvanen — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:17:51 +0000

Witty your west bank settlement bias is becoming more and more obvious. You are so devious, pretending to support two states.

By: RichardWitty

RichardWitty — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:34:48 +0000

So you two think it is humane to forcefully remove 500,000 from their homes? I don't think its right to forcefully remove anyone is the point. How anyone can derive from that statement that I regard it as acceptable to remove Palestinians from their homes is amazing. I have and do consistently oppose settlement expansion, in the present. "However, the correct move, and why nobody is trying to make this happen is beyond me, is to establish the borders of the Palestinian state along the green line, and tell the settlers they are welcome to stay where they are and become citizens of the state of Palestine." The seventy times that I stated that here, you didn't hear?