Comments on: Max Blumenthal: Feeling the hate in Tel Aviv (Huffington Post pulls the plug, again)

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:07:44 +0000

You obviously have no knowledge of law malum in say versus malum prohibitum. (SIC?) There's a huge difference between a trafffic sign violation and human rights violations. The ultimate issue is, do the Nuremberg Trials represent a humanistic accounting, or merely Might Makes Right? Hasbara addicts on this web site are in accord with Goering's conclusion. The issue devolves to, is this in the USA higher interests? The answer is, NO. Of course, the Zionists have a more bi-polar analysis. Goys are just instruments, cash cows and cannon fodder. They should feel lucky, they are tools of G-D's will!

By: Joe the ache

Joe the ache — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:59:35 +0000

Yeah, in a country that has stolen and starved the natives for sixty years (actually since the 1880's), its possible to find people who say unkind things about the Jews. Astonishing revelation.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:46 +0000

Yes, we are watching this, brian. We are watching Google, YouTube, and Vimeo very closely, as they attempt to extend the MSM blackout to the internet a la China. And as we are watching the "hate speech" and "hate crime" legislation sitting in the US Senate, already passed by overwhelmingly by the US House, and as we are watching the congressional vetting of Obama's "empathetic" recommendation for the next life time seat on the US Supreme Court. BTW, today basic cable cut off coverage of this vetting. So average Americans, who can actually afford taking the time of from work, now need C-Span 3 in addition to basic cable's C-Span 1, to even follow the whole vetting… Considering the importance of the 9 in impacting our lives and those of our children, this sure says a lot about the reality of US democracy, which theoretically depends on full knowledge by responsible US citizens.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:18:27 +0000

I agree with your general point; I merely want to point out that Palestinians are not allowed to serve in the IDF; they are not eligible for conscription in the first place, whether or not their personal views on Zionism. This is for two basic reasons: Israel views them as a 5th column because it knows it stole their land and has not given them full civil rights, and Israel is aware that throughout recorded world history, beginning to now, once anyone serves in support of any military force, they have a sympathetic claim on being accorded full membership in the group, entity, or state so served.

By: history buff

history buff — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:11:25 +0000

KKK is a reasonable analogy to Zionism in action through the hooded cloak of democratic Israel. Think about it, dear readers of this blog's comments. Not nearly as far-fetched as it at first blush seems.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:05:26 +0000

Wow, norm, it appears to you Max learned his technique from all those exposes of KKK, skinhead, and neo-Nazi youth that have posed as documentaries in the USA for decades? Good to know.Thanks!

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:56:25 +0000

Not to mention all the economic sanctions that have been passed by the US congress targeting Iran.

By: Citizen

Citizen — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:55:11 +0000

Look at a map of Iran, look at the US wars on the sides of its borders; consider the installment of the Shah back in the Iranian day; consider the US supported 8 year war by Iraq on Iran. Consider also all Israel's preemptive attacks on other nations in its neighborhood, and also the preemptive attacks specifically on Iraqi and Syrian nuclear facilities. Consider further the "bomb Iran" rhetoric that's been spewing out of influential US and Israeli leaders. Consider also that Iran signed the anti-nuclear international treaty and agreed to inspections, and further, that Israel has not done so. Does anyone doubt that Iran would agree to a nuclear-free zone over the entire MIddle East? Conversely is it even remotely fair to demand from Iran so much more than is demanded of Israel? Or the USA, for example? Remember the Cuban MIssile crisis? Under the historical and current circumstances I just suggested, who's being irrational here? When's the last time Iran went to war other than in self-defense? There's no record of Iran acting preemptively. Both the USA and Israel have done so–and the US doesn't even live in the region, except by funded proxy via Israel.

By: Reality

Reality — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:25:07 +0000

Correct, you sanely realize those voices come from mechanical Zionists who've chosen to be flat characters rather three-dimensional people with empathy for all humans.

By: historybuff

historybuff — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:17:00 +0000

Yeah, just like that Nazi officer took care of the violence emanating out of the Warsaw Ghetto. Good systematic application of organized force resulted in an efficient solution to terminate annoying resistance to well-intentioned occupation.