Comments on: Hoenlein: No daylight between US and Israel. Obama: I disagree

By: Citizen

Citizen — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:15:48 +0000

Yeah, that's a good sign.

By: average american

average american — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:33 +0000

The rest of the gentiles were working or looking for a job so we can continue to send checks to israel.

By: hasbarablaster

hasbarablaster — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:53:35 +0000

“He said, ‘I disagree,’ . . . ‘For eight years, there was no light between the United States and Israel, and nothing got accomplished.’ HALLELUJAH!!!!

By: USofIsrael

USofIsrael — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:23:54 +0000

Only if you think there is a difference between Israel's interest and the USA's interest. History shows the China Lobby has been treated much differently than the Israel Lobby, for example. Or the red fifth column. You are to believe the best interests of the USA are identical to Israel's. That way of thinking is best to avoid issues of dual loyalty, or rather evidence of Israel First policy. What US state is favored as much as Israel by our federal government?

By: DogNPonyShow

DogNPonyShow — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:13:45 +0000

The US Constitution requires any public taking to be compensated for–and it requires there be a pre-conditional "public purpose." "Officer, remove that man!"

By: justasking

justasking — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:09:22 +0000

Under what meaning of "due process" did the Jews invade the homeland of the natives?And ditto re the settlers' occupation in the land beyond that contemplated by the UN Partition? What internationally legally-approved right do the settlers have to thwart the natives' reclaiming of the land the settlers root on? Due process is a requirement by US Constitution regarding the taking of property. There is no Israeli Constitution.

By: Sand

Sand — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:53:10 +0000

I'm noticing nothing has been leaked about what was discussed about Iran -- and I'm sure that was a major topic of discussion. and now this comes out: Israel Warships Cross Suez In Possible Iran Signal MATTI FRIEDMAN -- July 14, 2009 " target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/14/israel-w... So what does Obama have to say about this? Or, are we about to be DRAGGED into a major ME dispute because we truly are joined at the hip with Israel?

By: Richard Witty

Richard Witty — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:30:18 +0000

Only if the PA unifies and offers what the PA has recently, that is permission for the settlers to remain in their homes, but as Palestinian citizens with the protection of equal due process and policing, but no provision for exclusively Jewish neighborhood, or exclusively Jewish roads. Any implication of forced removal of settlers will be responded defensively. Its a good offer, that suggests by example that Israel should offer literal equal due process under the law within all areas that it has permanent or temporary jurisdiction.

By: Ira G.

Ira G. — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:20:00 +0000

Maybe the Geneva Accords, although I have my doubts, but the Green Line? Richard do you think Obama can deliver the Green Line? Nice thought, though.

By: Todd

Todd — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:35:11 +0000

Has every president, and most members of congress, for the last 40+ years had different interests than the average American? Wouldn't it be more beneficial for most Americans to see Israel totally cut and isolated than to continue wasting time, money, influence and lives on a one or two-state solution that will largely benefit Jews, and that neither side will be happy with for long? Israel isn't the issue! With a former IDF volunteer as a main advisor to Obama, and Jewish zionists and progressives littering the government and media with their phoney internal struggle, is it reasonable to deny that Jewish influence rather than Zionist influence in America is the real problem?