The Bronner affair is but one example of the many ways in which in its coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Times fails to meet its most basic responsibilities as the world’s most influential newspaper: to fully and truthfully report on issues of the highest importance.
During World War II–as Times officials now apologetically acknowledge–the newspaper chose not to publish or downplayed a number of articles about the emerging Holocaust, presumably because it did not want to appear to be excessively concerned with Jewish issues. Today Israel and indeed the United States itself cannot afford continued inadequate coverage, inaccurate analysis, and biased commentary on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel is descending deeper and deeper into catastrophe, perhaps in the end an unimaginable one: if the conflict continues, it is hard to see how nuclear or biological terrorism can be indefinitely avoided. Moreover, it is not just Israeli survival that is at stake; although other issues play a role, thee is not the slightest doubt that rage at U.S. policies towards Israel are a major factor, perhaps the major factor, in the rage of Muslim fanatics towards our country.
The collapse of the Obama administration’s initial efforts to bring about a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict demonstrates–once again–that there is no chance for serious changes in the continuing U.S. policy of near-unconditional support of Israel without a reeducation of American officials, congressmen, and political elites. A crucial place to begin such a reeducation process would be in the pages of the New York Times.
Tragically, as the Bronner issue and the response of the Times both illustrate and symbolize, the prospects that this will occur are scant. Thirty or forty years from now, once again far too late, will the Times again apologize for its continued failures of truthful and responsible journalism?
-
-
- Aaron David Miller: After a short ‘peace process,’ look … 0
- Rafah march for deteriorating hunger strikers as family appeals for … 0
- Rafah’s nicest tunnel: Siege meets surf in Gaza 2
- Iranian talks fail after neocon ‘blitz’ — as Obama dispatches … 25
- Saving Illinois from Senator Kirk 8
- Human rights activists will hardnose the highway from Woodstock to … 0
- American Zionist responses to Tel Aviv riots– largely indifferent, but … 33
- Division: Romney supporter puts kibosh on Wasserman Schultz appearance at … 7
-
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 709
- ‘New York Review of Books’ calls it ‘apartheid’ and prepares … 566
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 466
- Neverending Nakba: Israel breaks lull, attacks Gazan farmers 413
- Day after pogroms, Likud MK calls for internment camp for … 397
- ‘This is not fair play’: Mahmoud Sarsak’s family demands his … 370
- March of the Flags 342
- Neocons in Washington Post: Military strike on Iran would ‘calm … 317
-
- The Messiah’s Donkey: Settlers fire on Palestinian villagers as the … 235
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 156
- March of the Flags 125
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their … 106
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 97
- Israeli judge to issue verdict in Rachel Corrie case 94
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond … 87
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 85
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their descendants (108)
- Annie Robbins: The Asian Jews I know would disagree with you about cultural ties, as would the black Jews, so would...
- Annie Robbins: I’m interested in what makes you feel qualified to determine the answer to convoluted questions of...
- Blake: Clearly fredblags has never met a Palestinian if he had they could have told him a thing or two about the...
- Passive-aggressive George Bush namechecks neocons for getting us into that mess (73)
- seanmcbride: G. Seauton, You wrote: “So basically, by equating the ‘JINSA crowd’ with the ‘prime mover,’ [do] you …...
- seanmcbride: G. Seauton, You have a crisp, clear mind and I appreciate that. You are no doubt right that my Roman...
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism (78)
- eljay: >> Not one mention in his diatribe about Palestinian rejectionism of an independent Jewish state....
- A portrait of a former Zionist (Part 1) (348)
- Annie Robbins: hostage, See pages 2-3 of the .pdf A/AC.24/SR.48 that link is not opening..i was only able to open...
- Turkish prosecutor recommends ten life sentences for Israeli generals behind Mavi Marmara attack (19)
- Theo: The turks waited long enough, however now that they made the first step, I hope they will not back down due to...
- Iranian talks fail after neocon ‘blitz’ — as Obama dispatches aide to reassure Tel Aviv (25)
- BradAllen: Daniel; Thanx for the link the AJE article, it shows the extent of US military in the region and...
- Bob Simon misses the story on Tel Aviv (17)
- Miss Costello: What a brilliant piece! Thanks.
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their descendants (108)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss

- Adam Horowitz

- Allison Deger

- Annie Robbins

- Kate

- Today in Palestine

- Alex Kane

- Eleanor Kilroy

Blogroll

Seems to me that on occasion the Times’ ME coverage is even worse and might be compared to its reporting (or non-reporting) of the famine in the Ukraine under Stalin.
I don’t know for sure but I don’t think that with the Holocaust the Times went so far as to denigrate or misrepresent those who were saying it was happening. Not so for Walter Duranty’s coverage of the Ukraine. (And indeed for his coverage essentially trying to validate Stalin’s show trials, and otherwise whitewashing just about the entire constellation of the Bolshevik’s crimes while he was in Moscow, which was quite a constellation.)
It’s one thing to ignore something, quite another to actively contribute to hiding it, lying about it and etc. And even in terms of the pure ugly numbers, the numbers who were murdered or wrecked in the Ukrainian famine and, essentially, the Gulag too that Duranty “missed” has got to be several multiples of the number of jews who died in the Holocaust, as hard as that is to believe.
Duranty’s criminality—any other word simply seems insufficient—is in fact so clearly established now that you have to wonder how the Times didn’t learn its lesson then about letting politics color its work. Or Mr. Bronner.
“the numbers who were murdered or wrecked in the Ukrainian famine and, essentially, the Gulag too that Duranty “missed” has got to be several multiples of the number of jews who died in the Holocaust, as hard as that is to believe.”
There’s a wider range of legitimate disagreement over the number of people Stalin killed than there is with the Holocaust, though everyone puts the figure in the multiple millions. For instance, for the Ukrainian famine there was a NYT story last year quoting a Ukrainian historian (who said that Stalin was guilty of deliberate genocide in the Ukraineas opposed to a catastrophic policy mistake), but he went on to say that the death toll was 3.5 million and not ten million. link
There’s a similar debate about the Gulag–wikipedia has a decent summary of the numbers debate in their Stalin article
link
…thee[sic] is not the slightest doubt that rage at U.S. policies towards Israel are a major factor, perhaps the major factor, in the rage of Muslim fanatics towards our country.
Right. Because as we all know, the moderate ones are thankful that the US is bombing them with drones from the air.
Say a small prayer for out bounty, and send in the drones. USA thanksgiving day is everyday.
Even dumb goys learn a little how the game is played in the new century.
We can send American officials to “reeducation” camps to learn the truth from Chairman Slater.
Sorry jerry I don’t buy your “truth”. You are just another progressive wacko who knows it all. Fortunately the only people who buy into your spin is other progressive wackos.