Thwack. Dust. Then fall. 8.5 seconds.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.

A murder is less to fear!

“the murder of the young King Edward V and his brother in 1483,”

It is always pretty naive to believe the official version. I suspect MI5, the CIA, and Mossad for that one.

As for my blog, I am pleased that you have visited my infrequently visited site, and, of course, would welcome comments on any of the posts. So you think that I tend to think inside the box? Interesting. What brought this on? Is this spillover from my comments regarding 911 Truth?

He isn’t confusing anything. He is playing right by the Hasbara Handbook. The conflation of ethnic cleansing with genocide is the most primary reason given to assert the denial of Israel not engaging in either.

By the way, I relayed to Glenn Greenwald’s forum the information found above in this thread that the video dates from a few weeks before 9/11. I would be grateful if somebody could explain how it is that the video can be dated then. (The timing of the Second Intifada attack that Bibi was responding to?)

i don’t think it is presumptuous at all, i think it makes perfect sense.

- Nobody knows for sure, which steel columns were in deed destroyed by the impact of the planes
- Was really used the temperature resistant steel as it was certified? Or did there happen some corruption while building WTC to use cheaper steel? It could also be, that just at higher places cheaper steel was used in a corruptive way of saving costs, because it wouldn’t have anway to bear so much weight.
- Were there really used fireproof materials inside WTC or did they just use cheap stuff and bribe controls?

I would say, that’s hard to know. So, if the USA is a very corrupt country, as I believe, it is possible, that the buildings just came down by fire and plane impact, though they were ought to be designed to stand it.

On the other hand we have Niels Harrit, who analyzed a probe of rubble and found – years later – high-tech nanothermite. That’s a strong hint that explosives were used. But even if I believe, that he carefully did his examinations, and I do so, there remain lot’s of possible sources of error. Just as example:

- Were the samples really from WTC dust? Or did someone exchange the probes somewhere? I can’t verify that.

And the other way round as many question marks occur. Keith, if you ask, how was it possible for these pre-placed explosives to survive the jetliner impact and raging inferno for 45 minutes to over one hour without exploding, the question is also double edged. How can it come, that the fireproof steel of the building was just collapsing 45 minutes after impact? If the jet had a “lucky strike”, hitting the steel structure mechanically at bad points, the structure should have collapsed immediately.

So, many physical parameters have some question marks attached, and in the end we can only argue based on our believes who is credible and what information is credible. I think I know what I’m talking about. I spend a lot of time investigating 9/11 and I hold an engineer degree myself. So you may expect I’m able to read the tech papers.

I do not want to create a rift – and especially not on technical analysis. I think many theories of how 9/11 happened have good reasons behind and the political goal shall be a new investigation, where Israeli intelligence – among others – is a prime suspect.

When I started the 9/11 topic here in this thread, I wanted just to say, what Netanyahu says in this video, supports the theory of an Israeli government hand in it or at least advanced knowledge. A hand in it or advanced knowledge is very hard to separate from each other.