Jewish left continues to take on the Simon Wiesenthal Center

Israel/PalestineMiddle East
on 7 Comments
2011AprEventsJ 115
Protesters outside the Simon Wiesenthal Center in New York City. (Photo: Bud Korotzer)

A coalition of progressive Jewish organizations on both coasts yesterday slammed the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s honoring of the civil rights-era Freedom Riders while “engaging in anti-Muslim bigotry that is no less destructive than that against which the Freedom Riders protested,” as Alan Levine, a New York activist and civil rights lawyer who worked in Mississippi in 1964 and 1965, put it in a press statement.

Simultaneously, Jewish peace groups, Palestine solidarity groups and the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California held a protest against the Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. The central demand of the protests was for the center, which runs the Museum of Tolerance, to be “a voice for justice on behalf of the Muslim community,” instead of a voice disrespecting Muslims.

It was the latest action to try and turn the heat up on the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which came out against the Park 51 Muslim community center and is building a Jerusalem branch of its Museum of Tolerance on top of a historic Muslim cemetery.

Jews Against Islamophobia, a coalition consisting of Jews Say No!, Jewish Voice for Peace, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice and American Jews for a Just Peace, has targeted the Simon Wiesenthal Center since mid-September. The coalition has conducted frequent demonstrations outside the Museum of Tolerance, holding up signs calling out the center’s “hypocrisy” and passing out flyers to passer-bys and those going into the museum.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, appeared on Fox News last August to say that the location of the proposed center, known as Park 51, was “insensitive.” The executive director of the center, which describes itself as a Jewish organization that “promotes human rights and dignity,” expressed similar sentiments to Crain’s New York Business.

The protests highlight the split within the American Jewish community over Park 51 and Islamophobia. For instance, Marc Tracy of Tablet pointed out last August that “out of the [Marist] pool of registered New York City voters, only 20 percent of Jews approve of the center, while 71 percent oppose it.”

In interviews, members of the coalition say their aim is to highlight alternative Jewish voices against Islamophobia and in support of the Park 51 project as well as attempt to pressure the center to reverse what they say is a hypocritical position. “As much as [mainstream Jewish organizations] want to marginalize others in the Jewish community, I think there are lots and lots of Jews who stand for the principles of justice together with other communities,” said Donna Nevel, a member of Jews Say No!

The coalition’s actions are meant to “let institutions such as the Wiesenthal Center know that they can’t get away with Islamophobic and anti-Arab racist comments and just assume that there’s not going to be any pushback,” said Jon Moscow, a leading member of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, a New York City-based social justice organization. Jewish groups’ opposition to Park 51 shows a “real misunderstanding of Jewish history in America, and to use the old phrase, ‘what’s good for the Jews,’” Moscow said.

In an emailed statement, the Simon Wiesenthal Center said that “the issue is not the right to build the Islamic Center, but one of sensitivity by religious leaders to the suffering of innocents. The Simon Wiesenthal Center believes that the feelings of the families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks are paramount.” The statement went on, saying, “if the families agree to the Islamic Center’s proposed location, fine; if they ask that it be moved, we would hope that the organizers would be sensitive to those feelings and move the location elsewhere in Manhattan.”

Those involved with Jews Against Islamophobia are also highlighting the connection between Islamophobia here and abroad by denouncing the Simon Wiesenthal Center for the building of a Museum of Tolerance on top of the Islamic Mamilla cemetery in Jerusalem. The Center for Constitutional Rights, which has filed a petition with several international bodies to halt construction of the museum, says the project has resulted in the “disinterment of hundreds of graves.”

A three-part investigation by the Israeli daily Haaretz documented the building of the museum, reporting that “hundreds of skeletons that were buried in Jerusalem’s central Muslim cemetery over a period of some 1,000 years” were “cleared away from the site swiftly and clandestinely during five grueling months of nonstop work.”

Rebecca Vilkomerson, the executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace, says that the Wiesenthal Center is using the word “tolerance as a fig leave, to engage in behavior that is anything but tolerant. There is a sort of fetishization of Jewish victim hood, but it doesn’t translate into identifying other forms of oppression, such as Islamophobia. In fact, by opposing Park 51, they are engaging in Islamophobia themselves.”

Vilkomerson says that given the history of discrimination against Jews in the U.S. and Jewish struggles in solidarity with other marginalized groups, the Jewish community should be standing firm against Islamophobia.

“It’s ‘never again’ for everyone, not just ‘never again’ for us. Therefore, its our responsibility to speak out when other groups are being targeted.”

Alex Kane is a freelance journalist and blogger based in New York City. He blogs on Israel/Palestine and Islamophobia in the United States at http://alexbkane.wordpress.com/.  Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.
 

7 Responses

  1. yourstruly
    April 7, 2011, 6:10 pm

    If building an Islamic center a couple blocks from the twin towers is insensitive to the families of those who died on 9/11, what is clearing away hundreds of skeltetons that over the past 1000 years had been buried in Jerusalem’s central Muslim cemetary. The word desecration comes to mind, as during ww2 in Poland, where the nazis zealously destroyed one Jewish cemetary after another. As if desecrating a cemetary isn’t horrible enough, replacing it with a museum of tolerance? Wouldn’t museum of intolerance be more accurate?

    • unverified__m7m01gj6
      April 7, 2011, 11:05 pm

      It’s “insensitive” to those who are ignorant enough to believe that Muslims were behind 9/11

      • Golden Rule
        April 7, 2011, 11:42 pm

        who did it then? Israel?

      • RoHa
        April 8, 2011, 12:21 am

        I certainly think so, but don’t let that sway you. I blame Mossad if I get three red traffic lights in a row.

        It is clear that the official story is a load of bollocks. That in itself doesn’t put Israel on the hook, or disprove the claim that Muslim terrorists did it.

        There is, however, a lot of circumstantial evidence gathered on conspiracy web-sites that certainly makes Israel look like a suspect.

        This is usually billed as “absolute proof”, but it is a long way from that.

        Here’s a fairly good one. It includes a lot of the usual material.

        link to how911wasdone.blogspot.com

      • Walid
        April 8, 2011, 3:25 am

        “… who did it then? Israel?”

        Why not? Get it out of your head that the pure and virtuous Israel wouldn’t do such things; If it could stoop to attacking the ship of its main ally and benefactor and kill its sailors, or kill and maim American activists protesting the injustices being committed by it, or lowest of lows, spying on it to sell its military secrets to its arch-enemy and causing the death of dozens of its agents, it would do it. It was not Muslims that were in need of “another Pearl Harbor” to jump-start “a New American Century.

        A few misguided Palestinians in a refugee camp may have passed out sweets after 9/11, but it was not Muslims that danced with joy across the Hudson at seeing the towers collapse and it wasn’t a Muslim Prime Minister that declared that 9/11 had been a good thing for Muslims as it swayed public opinion in their favour.

      • kylebisme
        April 8, 2011, 7:40 am

        It seems most likely to me that attacks were masterminded by some faction of corporate fatcats in the global banking cartel and military industrial complex. They undeniably benefited most from the attacks, of course have connections to people in governments and intelligence agencies all through the world to set the stage, and can easily scrounge up a few handfuls of Arab mercenaries to set up as patsies.

  2. Justice Please
    April 7, 2011, 6:22 pm

    “It’s ‘never again’ for everyone, not just ‘never again’ for us.”

    Unfortunately, much of what passes for “Holocaust remembrance” differs more or less from this simple truth.

    In any case, more power to Mrs. Vilkomerson. And kudos to everyone participating in this protest.

Leave a Reply