StandWithUs says that those seeking end to US military aid to Israel wants to ‘eliminate state of the Jewish people’

A good window on the paranoid mindset. Emma Silvers reports at JWeekly on the new ads in the Bay Area that call for ending military aid to Israel:

A spokesman for StandWithUs/S.F. Voice for Israel said the group will continue to speak out against “anti-Israel groups … trying to deceive the public through misleading ads.”

“Though their ads suggest they are in favor of ‘peace,’ their website explicitly calls for the elimination of the state of the Jewish people,” Dr. Mike Harris said on behalf of StandWithUs/S.F. Voice for Israel. “They actually oppose peace between a Jewish state of Israel and an Arab state of Palestine.”

Here are excerpts of the What-we-believe page from the website of those running the ads, BuildPeace.org. I have found no explicit call for anything's elimination (thanks to Annie):

We believe that peace is possible. We support policies that promote a genuine, lasting peace based on dignity, security, and equality for both Israelis and Palestinians.

We believe that U.S. policy has been an obstacle to peace. By offering unconditional, uncritical diplomatic support and tens of billions of dollars of military aid, our government has failed the interests of Israelis, Palestinians and our own national self-interest.

One-sided U.S. engagement has worsened and deepened the conflict by promoting the militarization of a conflict that cannot be solved by arming one side to the teeth. We believe that Israeli-Palestinian peace is our business as American citizens and taxpayers. Standing aside and doing nothing or “leaving it to the experts” doesn’t make us neutral, it makes us complicit in supporting policies that have brought decades of injustice and suffering.

The international perception of the U.S. as Israel’s financial backer and diplomatic shield have undermined America’s international standing and security in the world. We believe that military aid diverts tax money we need here at home. ...

Our billions in taxpayer-funded aid have perpetuated Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land and the dispossession of the Palestinian people. Despite Israel’s repeated and ongoing failures to comply with U.S. policy statements, our “no strings attached” unconditional funding of Israel has continued uninterrupted.

We believe in open debate. Too frequently, critics of Israeli policy have been demonized and marginalized. It is a positive development that growing numbers of Americans (including American Jews) are defying intimidation and baseless accusations of anti-Semitism by Israeli advocacy organizations and demanding open discussion about the morality and legality of Israel’s actions and policies.

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 6 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. hughsansom says:

    As with similar Israel-fanatic campaigns to silence dissent, this attack borders on libelous. Members of the Obama administration and Congress have made noises about criminalizing criticism of Israel. This is clearest in moves to identify _speech-acts_ supporting Palestinians as “material support for terrorism”.

    This being the case, attacks like those of Mike Harris and “StandWithUs” should be treated as actionable.

    • Dex says:

      “StandWithUs” — and by “us” they mean, racist, bigoted Zionists who love Israel more than the US, and would throw each and every American under the bus if it was in Israel’s interest — is a wingnut organization that claims to want “peace” pretends Israel and the US have the same values/interests, and then does everything to avoid it.

      I truly believe ad campaigns like the one in SF is huge. Americans “support” Israel b/c they don’t know better. Why? Because they don’t hear or see the truth.

      I hope these campaigns continue to spread across the US like wildfire. There was a point where pro-Zionist groups had enough power to pull ads like the one in SF quickly; now it seems like they are having more difficulty doing so. This is directly related to the BDS movement in my opinion.

      Keep it up everyone….soon these criminals will be on the run, like all criminals.

  2. annie says:

    the jweekly article is worth opening and reading in full. surprisingly, for the most part, it partly mirror’s henry’s article here. there are some very coincidental phrasing matches. hmmmm

    the comments, as far as i got w/them..were horrific. but read the article. emma only dedicated the very end for a response from stand w/us.

    The ads, part of a year-old national campaign, depict two grandfathers — one Israeli and one Palestinian — each holding a grandchild. The text reads “Join with us. Build peace with justice and equality. End U.S. military aid to Israel,” along with a web address for the Committee for a Just Peace in Israel and Palestine. The Chicago-based organization launched the original version of the initiative there in 2010; since then, local campaigns have placed ads on buses and billboards or in transit stations in Washington, D.C., Boston, Phoenix and Albuquerque, N.M.

    This ad went up at several transit sites in San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley this week.

    The new ads were posted Aug. 23 in the 12th Street Oakland, Downtown Berkeley, and Civic Center BART stations, as well as on the Muni level of the Embarcadero station in San Francisco and on a Powell Street cable car. The Northern California Friends of Sabeel, the chief sponsor of the local campaign, said the same ad will be posted next week in the 16th Street/Mission BART station in San Francisco.

    The ads are co-sponsored by Jewish Voice for Peace, American Muslims for Palestine, the Middle East Children’s Alliance, and Bay Area Women in Black.

    “Israel is one of the wealthiest countries in the world,” said Hassan Fouda, a NCFS member and one of the campaign’s organizers. “American aid encourages its violation of international law and moral conventions … Congress is planning deep cuts in Social Security, unemployment compensation, educational grants and other programs that help vulnerable Americans. Transferring billions of taxpayers’ money to Israel now is immoral.”

  3. pabelmont says:

    paragraph 2 neglecdts to say that the 10s of bill9ons of dollars in military aid (BTW, wouldn’t 100′s of billions be truer) goes TO ISRAEL. Perhaps a typo: here or there.

  4. Rusty Pipes says:

    As is typical, Stand With Us does not respond to the positions of those who place the ads, but with the rightwing Zionist spin it wants its audience to swallow. The coalition is explicit that their focus is on Human Rights and a Just Peace. This statement on its site shows diversity among its members on the subject of how many states, but unity on the issue of Human Rights:

    Henry Siegman’s 2007 article The Great Middle East Peace Process Scam[9] explains in simple terms what it would take to move beyond the impasse of posturing and failure. “If the US and its allies were to take a stand forceful enough to persuade Israel that it will not be allowed to make changes to the pre-1967 situation except by agreement with the Palestinians in permanent status negotiations, there would be no need for complicated peace formulas or celebrity mediators to get a peace process underway.” To put the peace process back on track, Siegman explains, it is necessary to “speak the truth about the real impediment to peace.” To do so, he urges, “would be a historic contribution to the Jewish state, since Israel’s only hope of real long-term security is to have a successful Palestinian state as its neighbour.
    George Bisharat, a professor at University of California Hastings College of Law, sees Israel’s integration into the Middle East as essential to its normalization and long-term well-being. Bisharat imagines a future in which “Israelis would enjoy the international acceptance that has long eluded them and the associated benefits of friendship, commerce and travel in the Arab world.”[10] The means to that end, Bisharat writes, is a “one-state option.” Although this option is “sometimes dismissed as utopian,” Bisharat reasons, “it overcomes major obstacles bedeviling the two-state solution. Borders need not be drawn, Jerusalem would remain undivided and Jewish settlers could stay in the West Bank. Moreover, a single state could better accommodate the return of Palestinian refugees. A state based on principles of equality and inclusion would be more morally compelling than two states based on narrow ethnic nationalism. Furthermore, it would be more consistent with antidiscrimination provisions of international law.”

    Stand With Us would distort the inclusion of a perspective like that expressed by Bisharat to claim that one-state is the demand of the group as a whole. Even though the group would support two states in the context of a just peace, it does not endorse the Liberal Zionist formula, “Two States for Two Peoples” where the two peoples are defined as “Jewish” and “Arab,” because that implies that Palestinian Citizens of Israel do not have the right of full citizenship in Israel (It also implies that Palestinian Jews do not have the right of full citizenship in a Palestinian State, an assertion that is explicitly debunked in the PLO Charter).

  5. Charon says:

    There is no state of the Jewish people

    Buildpeace.org doesn’t oppose “oppose peace between a Jewish state of Israel and an Arab state of Palestine”

    Everybody who is sane should oppose the racist and dangerous idea of a “Jewish state” because the concept is incompatible with peace. Buildpeace is stating the obvious, that Israel’s own policies oppose the concept of a two-state solution so how can they be serious about peace? Even the ‘liberal’ Zionists like Witty and J-Street acknowledge this but somehow seem to think it is still possible. If math teacher decides one day he is going to take up painting and create a masterpiece, after 20 years of drawing garbage he probably isn’t going to create one.

Leave a Reply