News

If Sen. Ron Wyden wants to end arms sales to Bahrain for ‘violently suppressing peaceful civil dissent’, why not Israel?

Josh Ruebner writing for TheHill.com:

Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is admirably legislating against U.S. arms sales to Bahrain, the autocratic Gulf kingdom which has killed at least 30 protesters during the Arab Spring. To suppress protests, Bahrain has arrested more than 1,600 protesters, has fired 2,500 from their jobs, and is handing down harsh jail terms to medical personnel who treated injured protesters. This brutal repression of Bahraini human rights led Wyden to introduce a resolution to prohibit U.S. weapons sales to Bahrain until it meets stringent human rights criteria, helping to generate enough political pressure so that the Obama Administration has delayed implementation of its shameful decision last month to sell $53 million of weapons to Bahrain.

“Selling weapons to a regime that is violently suppressing peaceful civil dissent and violating human rights is antithetical to our foreign policy goals and the principle of basic rights for all that the U.S. has worked hard to promote,” Wyden argued.

While this principle should apply to all U.S. weapons sales, it should be even more strictly adhered to when U.S. taxpayers are funding weapons sales through military aid. Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. military aid, scheduled to receive $30 billion in taxpayer-financed weapons between 2009 and 2018, and also violently suppresses nonviolent Palestinian protest and commits grave human rights violations against Palestinians living under its illegal 44-year military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip .
 . .

Given Wyden’s professed commitment to U.S. weapons not being misused to further human rights violations, the Senator should be outraged as well by U.S. military aid to Israel, for which his Oregon constituents are expected to pay more than $285 million between 2009 and 2018. Yet, instead, Wyden praises Israel as “a stable democracy and a stalwart ally” and keynotes at fundraisers for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, an outfit that lobbies for more U.S. aid to Israel to the detriment of unmet needs at home. 



Wyden should not hold Israel to a different standard. If U.S. weapons should not support Bahrain’s human rights abuses, then neither should they support Israel’s denial of Palestinian freedom and self-determination.

48 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Bahrain, I believe, hosts a major USA military installation, and the USA’s military empire would like to remain on friendly terms there. selling arms would appear to help with that.

Why Sen. Wyden is unconcerned with this matter of empire is curious. Perhaps he knows that his pro-human-rights move will bring him votes locally and he is, perhaps, also an enemy of empire.

Israel, I believe, doesn’t do a darn thing for the USA but for domestic political reasons, the entire USA political system would like to keep friends with Israel. Perhaps Sen. Wyden is enough of a political realist to realize that and for that reason he keeps mum on Palestine.

Wyden’s been doing Israel’s bidding for a long time

http://www.counterpunch.org/2003/11/29/us-congress-does-israel-s-bidding-again/

http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/02/04/ron-wyden-and-israel/

Only….umm….democracy…….uhh…..stable…….ally……dangerous neigborhood……umm……HAMAS!!!

Because they have to sign a pledge of support for Israel. That’s what Cynthia McKinney says anyway. She lost me over supporting Gaddaffi as a saint though. Then again, who knows what was going on over there with the conflicting reports even in ‘alternative’ media and celebration photos from years ago in India.

If such a pledge exists, it wouldn’t be surprising. I would like a scan of one though

The boots on the ground who did the violent suppressing were Saudi. Why not go to the source and cut off arms sales to them?