News

Romney’s adviser on Middle East has had a career boosted by Israel lobby

It is routine for American experts to dismiss the Arab world as being full of conspiracy theory. Tom Friedman does it. So did Michael Gordon in the New York Times the other day in an article on Saddam Hussein. But some of this criticism stems from the fact that Arab media insist on talking about the Israel lobby in a way that our media refuse to do. Al Jazeera has an excellent piece by Muhammad Idrees Ahmad on Walid Phares, Mitt Romney’s scary adviser on foreign policy in the Middle East. Why isn’t this in the American press? Ahmad:

By any measure, Phares’ career has been an unmitigated success: He has found rare exalted space in the Israel lobby’s firmament, which has helped elevate him into various government advisory positions. He is promoted as a featured expert by the David Project, the Israel on Campus Coalition, David Horowitz’s FrontPage Magazine, Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, and Daniel Pipes’ Middle East Forum. He is also an associate of Israel’s Ariel Center for Policy Research and a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). He serves on the board of ACT! For America, a pressure group that Politico described as part of an “effort to transform anti-Islam crusading into a mainstream lobbying effort”. The group was established by Brigitte Gabriel, whom Deborah Solomon of the New York Times Magazine has described as a “radical Islamophobe”. Like Phares, Gabriel emerged from the sectarian milieu of the Lebanese civil war, whose prejudices both now seek to foist on the wider world.

Phares also serves on the advisory board of the Clarion Fund, a production company associated with the radical Israeli settler group Aish HaTorah, which even Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic has described as “just about the most fundamentalist movement in Judaism today”. The Clarion Fund came to prominence with the anti-Islam film Obsession, 28 million copies of which were distributed during the 2008 presidential campaign in an attempt to inflame Middle America’s suspicion of the “Muslim Manchurian candidate” Barack Hussein Obama. Phares has appeared in at least two of Clarion’s films, The Third Jihad and Iranium, the latter an unabashed call for regime change in Iran, including the use of military action. In an extended appearance on Fox’s Hannity, Phares joined the film’s producer, Rabbi Raphael Shore of Aish HaTorah, to stress the implacability of the Iranian regime and the menace of radical Islam. Both denounced successive US administrations as appeasers. They also cast aspersions on the Arab Spring, declaring it a replay of the Iranian revolution, a prelude to an Islamist takeover.

So eccentric are Phares’ views that, earlier this year, even Republican Chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security, Representative Peter King had to drop him from his controversial “Muslim radicalisation” hearings. This prompted a spirited defence from Robert Spencer, who accused King of “shrinking-violet delicacy“. Spencer serves with Phares on the board of Gabriel’s ACT! and, like Phares, is fighting his own holy war. In The Post-American Presidency, a book co-authored with Pamela Geller (featuring a foreword by John Bolton), he exposes the Obama Administration’s “war on America” which includes inflicting universal healthcare and public education on its people and eroding its commitment to Israel. In a promotional video posted online, Spencer and Geller exhort viewers to stop “the anti-Semite in the White House, and his useful idiots in the Congress”, before they bring about “a second Holocaust”.

But the most significant of Phares’ affiliations are with FDD and the Center for Security Policy (CSP), two think-tanks that played a leading role in pushing the war against Iraq. In April 2002, in a seemingly coordinated campaign, the two think-tanks ran ads which lumped Yasir Arafat, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein into a single unified threat menacing the US and Israel. It is the same dissolving of differences that Phares trades in today.

23 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ordering this data with a bit of semantic markup to help see what is going on:

# Israel lobby > Mitt Romney
1. Israel lobby > ACT! for America > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
2. Israel lobby > Aish HaTorah > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
3. Israel lobby > Ariel Center for Policy Research > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
4. Israel lobby > Brigette Gabriel > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
5. Israel lobby > Clarion Fund > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
6. Israel lobby > CSP (Center for Security Policy) > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
7. Israel lobby > Daniel Pipes > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
8. Israel lobby > David Horowitz > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
9. Israel lobby > David Project > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
10. Israel lobby > FDD (Foundation for the Defense of Democracies) > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
11. Israel lobby > Fox News > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
12. Israel lobby > Frontpage Magazine > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
13. Israel lobby > Islamophobes > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
14. Israel lobby > Israel on Campus Coalition > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
15. Israel lobby > Israel Project > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
16. Israel lobby > Jihad Watch > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
17. Israel lobby > John Bolton > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
18. Israel lobby > Middle East Forum > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
19. Israel lobby > neoconservatives > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
20. Israel lobby > Pamela Geller > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney
21. Israel lobby > Robert Spencer > Walid Phares > Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney, like most Republicans and many Democrats, is totally under the thumb of the most extreme right-wing regime in Israeli history — a regime whose values and agenda are radically at odds with basic American values and interests.

Ron Paul appears to be the only presidential candidate who isn’t under the thumb of Likud and radical secular and religious Zionists.

Sean McBride
http://friendfeed.com/seanmcbride
http://friendfeed.com/mideast-politics

I’ve already posted how Romney has specifically filled his advising core to the brim with neocons. Why are people like Jennifer Rubin all the sudden so warm towards him, or the folks at Commentary magazine?

Romney wants to get elected, no matter what. And he knows the quickest route there is through wealthy pro-Israel/neocon donors.

The best way to measure influence of a movement is not how far it’s greatest figures go; even an obscure movement can produce greats. The best measure is how far total crazies like Phares are being let into the establishment, and if you look at his career and his total paranoia it’s clear that there is a clear tolerance of extreme amounts of islamophobia that would never be possible if it was directed towards Jews.

Of course there is tons of racism in the Jewish community visavi Arabs. Even if a lot of people don’t agree even with the milder versions of Phares(like Kristol), Phares is in the end little more but a puppet; a figurehead for the neocon donors. And the wider Jewish community tolerates this, because we fear the loss of power.

They do say that power corrupt and we, at least in this regards, appear not to be very Chosen or different.
I think one day Jews as a people will get through this collective myopia, because we will one day be forced to if nothing is done(and I don’t see any serious inside effort, blessings to Weiss included).

Regarding Romney: wouldn’t you think that someone who belongs to a minority religion (Mormonism) that has been subject to bigotry, abuse and discrimination over the last century would be sensitive and principled about associating with extreme religious bigots like Walid Phares? But clearly this isn’t the case with Mitt Romney — he is driven entirely by unprincipled opportunism.

These candidates use neocons as foreign policy advisers for that coveted “Jewish Vote” aka rich Zionist donors (and not actual Jewish voters)

It’s selfish and disgusting. Islamophobic war-mongering extremists should not be allowed to hold any government position. IMO they belong behind bars.

Romney has not, has never, been subjected to being a minority. Not ever. His dad was a gov. He spent his life in privilege. None of this Mormon stuff came up when he was gov of MA. He’s been a successful business and understands the corridors of power, where they don’t a shit if you’re a pygmy pagan—ask anyone robbing Africa—as long as you understand the corridors of power and how the money flows and operates, and who is supposed to get it.

The Israel Firsters big problem is getting the black vote convinced that Obama isn’t looking out for them—God Forbid they vote en masse again!—which they’ve been working on with AIPAC Black-Leader trips to Israel, nothing like a little Jezuss and Zion. (I’m not convinced this is going to work at the grassroots from my conversations late at night with local Black political hands, not this time). Jews have always looked on Black brains with disdain in my entre-nous experience; nothing they would ever say out loud, but have said to me countless gazillion times (‘we had to help them get their civil rights, they couldn’t have done it without us’ . . . heard that too many times to count).

Romney wants the presidency. Period. He does what he has to do.

And Americans will trade a black man for a white man thinking that will do the trick. ‘One of ours’ is back in the saddle, ‘how bad could that be’. ‘We’ll be safe again!’