Dubious Charlie Rose asks Ehud Barak why not one state?

on 57 Comments
Charlie Rose

Last night, Charlie Rose asked Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak what would be so bad about a one-state solution. 34:00 or so. The dialogue (partial transcript below) is not in itself that remarkable, but it followed on Rose expressing great discomfort with the Gaza onslaught of 2008-2009– “was it the appropriate response in your judgment?” Barak came off as rigid and a bit high-handed. I sense Rose is reflecting growing establishment impatience with Israel’s actions, cf. David Remnick saying, “I can’t take the occupation any more.” 

Rose: Is a one-state solution the worst thing that could happen to Israel?

Barak: …It’s extremely bad for Israel.

Rose: Because?

Barak: Because Israel has been established to become a Zionist democratic Jewish state… The only solution is to delineate a certain line within which we would have a solid Jewish majority for generations to come….

Note Barak’s racial demographics.  He despaired that the alternative is “two communities bleeding into one another” in a Belfast or Bosnia-like situation. I can’t imagine that sits well with Rose, who grew up in Jim Crow North Carolina.

    Leave a Reply