News

For Hanukkah this year, our chefs prepare a special dish: their own words

Thomas Friedman
Thomas Friedman

Master chef Tom Friedman prepared this dish yesterday, as Hanukkah began:

New York Times columnist Tom Friedman told The Jewish Week Tuesday that he regrets writing in his Dec. 13 column (“Newt, Mitt, Bibi and Vladimir”) that the standing ovation Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received in Congress this year “was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.”

“In retrospect I probably should have used a more precise term like ‘engineered’ by the Israel lobby — a term that does not suggest grand conspiracy theories that I don’t subscribe to,” Friedman said. “It would have helped people focus on my argument, which I stand by 100 percent.”

Joe Klein’s recipe, a few days back:

A few hours ago, I received an anguished email from my friend Jeff Goldberg, who was incensed that I’d written this sentence:

“It’s another thing entirely to send American kids off to war, yet again, to fight for Israel’s national security.” [emphasis his]

Jeff had jumped to a silly conclusion. I was concerned about sending American kids off to war yet again. I separated the phrase with commas in order to emphasize the too-many-times we’ve sent our troops overseas in the past decade. It might have been more accurate if I’d written “to send American kids off to war yet again–this time, to fight for Israel’s national security.” Which I believe is what the warmongering against Iran is all about. But the thought that we’d gone to war in the past, especially in Iraq, to fight for Israel’s national security was nowhere in my mind. Nowhere. I don’t believe we’ve ever gone to war to fight for Israel’s national security. Period.

Here is another concoction whipped up by Goldberg, and tasted by Karen Greenberg, last week or so:
 

A couple of Goldblog readers alerted me to a Max Blumenthal story in which Karen Greenberg,  the director of the Fordham School of Law’s Center on National Security, is quoted accusing Israel of teaching American interrogators the dark art of torture:

“After 9/11 we reached out to the Israelis on many fronts and one of those fronts was torture,” Greenberg told me. “The training in Iraq and Afghanistan on torture was Israeli training. There’s been a huge downside to taking our cue from the Israelis and now we’re going to spread that into the fabric of everyday American life? It’s counter-terrorism creep. And it’s exactly what you could have predicted would have happened.”

…Well, I called Greenberg, and it turns out that she, too, was surprised, because she said she never told Max Blumenthal any such thing. Here’s what she told me: “I never made such a statement. I’ve never seen any proof of this. I told him I had heard a story out there about this issue, but that he should look into it and see if he could find evidence, because I have no proof of this charge. You have to be particularly careful when it comes to torture, you have to be careful not to overreach. He was looking for corroboration but I told him I didn’t have any.”

New York Times, no slouch at holiday preparations:

Originally, this post included a sentence that read, “British troops left, thousands of Palestinian Arabs were expelled or fled and Arab armies soon invaded Israel.” In response to reader comments, the sentence was later edited to read, “British troops left, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled and Arab armies invaded Israel.” But other readers have challenged that wording as well. There is intense disagreement among historians and activists about events surrounding the establishment of Israel, and journalists and educators alike must take care in describing them or risk appearing to take sides in the historical and political disputes. A more neutral rendering of the sentence might be, “British troops left, thousands of Palestinian Arabs were expelled or fled and Arab armies invaded Israel.”

O.K. now I’m hunting the back of the fridge for leftovers. But this one is a classic. Richard Goldstone’s recipe, in two parts:

 

1. Richard Goldstone in ’09 upon releasing his famous report accusing Israel of extensive war crimes in its attack on Gaza in ’08-’09:

“I saw the destruction of the only flour-producing factory in Gaza. I saw fields plowed up by Israeli tank bulldozers. I saw chicken farms, for egg production, completely destroyed. Tens of thousands of chickens killed. I met with families who lost their loved ones in homes in which they were seeking shelter from the Israeli ground forces. I had to have the very emotional and difficult interviews with fathers whose little daughters were killed, whose family were killed. One family, over 21 members, killed by Israeli mortars. So, it was a very difficult investigation, which will give me nightmares for the rest of my life.”

2. Richard Goldstone in the famous Washington Post Op-Ed of April 2011, “Reconsidering the Goldstone Report…”

“If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document… For example, the most serious attack the Goldstone Report focused on was the killing of some 29 members of the al-Simouni family in their home. The shelling of the home was apparently the consequence of an Israeli commander’s erroneous interpretation of a drone image, and an Israeli officer is under investigation for having ordered the attack. While the length of this investigation is frustrating, it appears that an appropriate process is underway, and I am confident that if the officer is found to have been negligent, Israel will respond accordingly.”

50 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Maybe friedman can regain his composure by bringing this to
the attention of middle america

Haaretz survey: 46% of Israelis thinks gays are deviants
Poll also finds 71 percent of ultra-Orthodox population believe homosexuality is a perversion.
By Ofri Ilani
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/haaretz-survey-46-of-israelis-thinks-gays-are-deviants-1.281474

brilliant, phil, just brilliant!

What do we get from these recipes?
Bitter lemons?
Humble Pie?
Or a loaf of dread? (ie fear for career!)

The Lobby’s politically correct guillotine is standing right in an open view.
Waiting for those who dare.
Some heads,now have to do heavy explanations if they don’t want to have a closer encounter with sharp edges of the infamous device.
Warnings have been sent. Apologies, excuses, recantations and eating their own words started.
Bon apetite.
“I’m all for it, but basically I’m against” Lech Walesa’s quote of the fool.

“In retrospect I probably should have used a more precise term like ‘engineered’ by the Israel lobby. Tom Friedman

splitting hairs, always lawyered up for a legal defense.

This is the Judge Goldstone effect.