News

British gov’t’s failed effort to deport Palestinian sheikh ends with focus on ‘barrage of racist policies’ in only ME democracy

Raed Salah writes at the Guardian about his long battle to resist deportation proceedings, initiated last June. His piece is powerful and moving– excerpt below. And look how many comments it has already attracted: 361. The first states the case appropriately:

How ironic, and fitting, that after his shameful arrest, imprisonment and restriction at the hands of a government we never elected, Sheikh Salah will now have a far larger audience than would have heard him had he been allowed to complete his scheduled UK speaking tour which his wrongful detention interrupted.
Journalist David Hearst (Guardian online, 9 April) argued that ‘the heart of the matter’ in the Home Secretary’s illegitimate attempt to exclude Sheikh Salah from the UK was her exclusive reliance on untrustworthy advice from the Community Security Trust. That advice, in the view of two expert witnesses, ‘failed to distinguish between anti-Semitism and criticism of the acts of the Israeli state and therefore gave an unbalanced perspective.’ This is indeed a crucial point. Their arguments are now so threadbare that apologists for Israeli apartheid, without a shred of credible evidence, routinely accuse its critics of anti-Semitism.

For background, here is Michael Weiss, one of the instigators of the smear campaign against Salah that resulted in the deportation case.

Now here is Salah:

After a 10-month legal battle, I have now been cleared on “all grounds” by a senior immigration tribunal judge, who ruled that May’s decision to deport me was “entirely unnecessary” and that she had been “misled”. The evidence she relied on (which included a poem of mine which had been doctored to make it appear anti-Jewish) was not, he concluded, a fair portrayal of my views. In reality, I reject any and every form of racism, including antisemitism.

I have no doubt that, despite this, Israel’s cheerleaders in Britain will continue to smear my character. This is the price every Palestinian leader and campaigner is forced to pay.

My people – the Palestinians – are the longstanding victims of Israeli racism. Victims of racism, anywhere, should never condone or support the maltreatment of another people, as Israel does.

The suffering of the Palestinian citizens of Israel has been ignored for decades. But there is today a growing awareness of it, which partially explains this smear campaign against me. In December 2011, EU ambassadors in Israel raised serious concerns about Israeli discrimination, noting that “not only has the situation of the Palestinian Arab minority in Israel not improved, but it has further deteriorated”.

There are around 1.5 million Arabs in Israel. We make up 17% of the population, but we face a barrage of racist policies and discriminatory laws. We receive less than 5% of funds allocated by the government for development. Public spending on children in Arab municipalities is one-third lower than that of children in Jewish municipalities. The average hourly wage of Arab workers is about 70% of that of Jewish workers. Any Jew, from any country, is allowed under Israel’s law of return to migrate to Israel; Palestinian refugees are not allowed to exercise their right of return. While a Jew can live anywhere in Israel, a Palestinian citizen cannot. Jews can marry whoever they wish and live with them in Israel, Palestinian citizens cannot.

…Nowhere is the injustice more striking than in the Negev. Living in poverty in “unrecognised” villages, the Arab Bedouin are ineligible for basic services such as water, electricity, and healthcare. The Negev village of al-Araqib has been demolished 35 times by the Israeli government; on every occasion it was rebuilt by its inhabitants.

Despite the Israeli policy of “transfer” – another term for ethnic cleansing – the Palestinians will not go away. The Israeli state can occupy our lands, demolish our homes, drill tunnels under the old city of Jerusalem – but we will not disappear. Instead, we now aspire to a directly elected leadership for Palestinians in Israel; one that would truly represent our interests. We seek only the legal rights guaranteed to us by international conventions and laws.

Thanks to Elly Kilroy.

21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

at the base of the guardian link is a small paragraph with three links to specific comments that provide context including segments of the judgement. they are worth reading.

Thanks, Elly.

533 comments, now.

BTW, the judge at his trial found him to be an anti-Semite, he just didn’t think that warranted being barred from England

From the judge’s decision:
“In our judgment this is all wholly unpersuasive. The appellant is clearly aware of the
blood libel against Jews. If his intention had been to draw an analogy between events
of the Spanish Inquisition and actions of the Israeli state he could have said so in
clearer terms that did not require over ten paragraphs of explanation for his true
meaning to be made clear. If he had meant to refer to Christians using the blood of
others to make bread, which he seems to consider less offensive than referring to
Jews doing so, then he could have inserted the word “Christian” into the text of his
the sermon as he does in paragraph 175 of his explanation. Allusion to historical
examples of children being killed in religious conflict does not require reference to
their blood being used to make “holy bread”. The truth of the matter is that the
conjunction of the concepts of ‘children’s blood’ and ‘holy bread’ is bound to be seen
as a reference to the blood libel unless it is immediately and comprehensively
explained to be something else altogether.”

no, breadflogs, nowhere does the judge say salah is an anti-semite. the judge found that the admittedly objectionable material you cited was not indicative of salah’s broader views, and was not ‘the tip of the iceberg’, meaning that there were not more problematic texts to be revealed to prove a history of anti-semitic preaching as was erroneously alleged. in any event this is all beside the point. salah was arrested and imprisoned on account of false evidence cooked up by the loathesome CST. geddit? i’ll say it again more slowly: he … was … arrested … and … went … to … jail … on … the … basis … of … falsified … evidence. that’s the point, that the legal process was exploited and perverted by those lying sacks of sh*t.

UPDATE

was breadflogs’ comment disappeared? or has he been shipped off to the permafrost?

fred, did you try reading the links i provided from the guardian’s Comment editor Becky Gardiner in the comments at the first link? because if you had you would have found this:

The judge did not accept Salah’s explanation, saying he found it “wholly unpersuasive”. He said the speech “would offend and distress” Jews. However, he also noted that the sermon as a whole “was against the actions of the state of Israel” rather than Jews as such.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/19/britain-duty-to-palestinian-people?commentpage=5#comment-15720063

response to Sprindew continued …

To conclude, the judge said that:

“…there is no reliable evidence of [Salah] using words carrying a reference to the blood libel save in the single passage in a sermon delivered five years ago. … The absence of other evidence is striking … [Salah] is a prominent public figure and a prolific speaker. … his speeches are of interest to the authorties in Israel. … We think it can be fairly said that the evidence before us is not a sample, or ‘the tip of the iceberg’: it is simply all the evidence there is.”

And later:

“the matters raised by the Secretary of State are not a fair portrayal of [Salah’s] views or words as a whole; they are in essence confined to words on one day, that are not shown to have caused any difficulty at the time or since. There is no evidence that the danger percieved by [Theresa May] is perceived by any of the other countries where [Salah] has been, nor, save for the very tardy indictment, is there any evidence that even Israel sees the danger [she] sees.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/19/britain-duty-to-palestinian-people?commentpage=5#comment-15720076