News

Denial

Emma Thompson
Emma Thompson (credit: CC Caroline Bonarde Ucci, Wikipedia)

The Jewish problem of our times is psychological denial having to do with our relations to others: denial of our social status in the U.S., denial of human rights atrocities in Palestine.

Here are three sides of the same coin:

1. From a letter to Emma Thompson, the British actress who has endorsed a boycott of the Israeli Habima Theater, from an anonymous English Jew. I got it from an Israel lobbyist. This is pure craziness:

There is another aspect to your downright nasty and disingenuous call for a boycott. As Jews we remember another boycott started in 1933 in another country, when ugly mobs stood outside Jewish shops and Jewish performers were barred from performing. We all know how that ended. Tell me what is the difference between you and those previous groups calling for expulsion of Jewish performers? From where I am standing as an English Jew, they are one and the same.

So this person is accusing Emma Thompson of seeking the extermination of Jews because she wishes to protest human rights abuses in Palestine…

2. The other day a friend of my wife came to visit. She was big in print journalism, now she’s got a new website. I was coming in and out of the house, at work on a project, but I stopped for a moment to have the pleasure of talking with her about the internet and all the new journalism issues involved: the writing style on the web, the relationship of a journalist to the readers and to other sites, and the degree to which one can or cannot affect one’s reputation online.

Then I said, “Well at my website–” And she waved her hand and said, “I don’t really want to talk about your website.”

My feelings were hurt. But she is Jewish: she stands for the tribe, she is more conventional than I am that way. I forgave her, somewhat, by remembering my first visit to Hebron in 2006 with Breaking the Silence. The van was filled with Israelis, good Israelis. We had just seen videos of settlers stoning Palestinian girls walking to school and I said to my translator, What do Israelis think about this? She said, “They don’t know about this.” And two of the Israelis turned in anger. Both said, “They don’t want to know about it!

My wife’s friend doesn’t want to know what is being done in our name, for she knows deep inside, knowledge would demand action, would require too much rearrangement of social conditions.

3. Emerson understood the impotence of denial of gross injustice. He wrote the following in his journals in late 1859, reflecting on the hanging of John Brown in Virginia for the raid on Harpers Ferry:

The Resistance to Slavery. It is the old mistake of the slaveholder to impute the resistance to [anti-slavery leaders] Clarkson or Pitt, to Channing or Garrison, or to some John Brown whom he has just captured, and to make a personal affair of it; and he believes, whilst he chains and chops him, that he is getting rid of his tormentor; and does not see that the air which this man breathed is liberty, and is breathed by thousands and millions; that men of the same complexion as he, will look at slaveholders as felons who have disentitled themselves to the protection of law, as the burglar has, whom I see breaking into my neighbor’s house; and therefore no matter how many Browns he can catch & kill, he does not make the number less, for the air breeds them, every school, every church, every domestic circle, every home of courtesy, genius, & conscience is educating haters of him & his misdeeds.

I need to repeat his words: You cannot personalize this to Emma Thompson. The air we breathe is liberty. And every home of courtesy, genius & conscience is educating haters of Israel & its misdeeds. Today that is Israel’s problem in the world. I urge American Jews to wake up. 

75 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This reminds me of your post about Doris Lessing, as she grew up in white rule Rhodesia, how she was hated by the whites. Most of them weren’t bad people. They were just used to British imperialism. It had been so for their fathers and grandfathers. It was the world that they were used to. And they knew that if they took her words seriously, their world would fall down.

Of course, in the Jewish context it’s much more painful. By the time she came about, Britain had ruled the seas for centuries. The British people did not know true suffering(in relative terms, compared to the vast majority of nations in the world). And those who did suffer, at least, did not wind up on large mansions in central Africa hunting and relaxing.

In the Jewish context, the powerlessness and chronic weakness is the backdrop. Jews don’t know power. We’ve never really tasted it. Sure, you have a Rothschild here and there. But what did that help? Most of them cared more about helping the British empire than their fellow Jew. Some even renounced their Jewishness in order to blend in.

A lot of Jews do not know this today, but at the onset of the French Revolution, the Sephardi Jews who were at that time the highest-ranking Jews and some of whom had made names for themselves viciously attacked the vast Ashkenazi Jewish masses for being ‘not like them’. In fact, when they sought Jewish emancipation, they insisted that Ashkenaz and Sepharad were two distinct races alltogether and any Jewishness is more illusion than fact.

The french came to their senses and decides to give all (formal) emancipation, regardless of skincolor or ethnicity. But this should be remembered, how Jew turned on Jew. This is the end result of centuries of humiliation. This is what the early Zionists detested when they spoke of the ‘Diaspora Jew’. He who crowered in the shadows and sold out his fellow Jews, poor and huddled, for approval to his Gentile masters at whose steps he danced like a clown.

What happened as a reaction to this was an overreaction, as we can all see. But unlike European peoples, Jews have never tasted power. We cannot comprehend ourselves as oppressors of another people. It’s a new role for us.

So I think it’s a generational issue. The price to pay for Jewish normalization is that you have an older generation which is incapable of thinking of themselves as regular humans. Many Jews still think, deep inside, that they are frankly incapable of being racists – as crazy as it may sound. This is all a legacy of Jewish collective history.

But among those my age, under the age of 30, things change. True, in every population you will have racists and chauvinists. And unlike a white European Gentile, there’s no punishment for a white Jew to be a bit of a racist, because, frankly, there is still deep anti-Semitism in the world(although the West). Just look at the TV in a lot of Arab countries(of course, Islamophobia is growing in the West, and totally exploding in Israel).

But as I’ve become convinced of now.. the Jewish transformation will take generations to complete. And there isn’t that kind of time. That’s why I think it will be Gentiles who will do what will be needed. Beinart’s book was easy to publish. The pioneers in the American discourse were Walt/Mearsheimer. They weren’t the first, but they were the most comprehensive. They had all the right credentials and the high-powered intellect. But most important of all; they had to courage to write of what they wrote without beings Jews. They broke the barrier, despite the enormous backlash.

The people who ended Jim Crow were a large mix, but most whites, even in the North, did not mobilize. Jews had a special role in that. Not that we were inherently more moral, like some people still think. But because we as outsiders of the power structure understood the hypocrises and the corruption in the system, and we exposed it. The most bizarre thing in Jewish modern life is that in a record short timespan, we’ve switched places and become part of the corrupted establishment.

Now it is we that hold another people under oppression, and silence all who wish to write about it truthfully(because they have to deal with our political and media power, the latter of whom which not even Walt/Mearsheimer dared to step into).
And this transformation is a revolt against all our history. So that we are even having this conversation is itself a small miracle. And we shouldn’t perhaps be too harsh against the likes of your friend, while not forgetting to remind her of her cowardice.

People with privilege think of it as a “given”, not necessarily “deserved” but of long standing, dependable, and “theirs”. It hurts to hear it challenged, to contemplate losing it, to contemplate coming-to-believe-it-is-wrong. To be “conservative” in the usual political meaning is to seek to preserve one’s own privileges. Just as if they were deserved. Even to seek to preserve the entire structure of privileges, including one’s own and others’. Stick together, you privileged folks! For many people including the poor, “family values” means the husband rules the roost — has privilege over wife and kids. Privilege! that’s why they vote conservative tickets. (The enemy.)

As as a law school prof, teaching “Property”, said to his first class, his two-year old understood the basics of property law when he said of something, [Let go of that] “It’s Miiiiine”. Never mind how it got that way. (Prof forgot to remind us that “all property is theft”.)

Men want to dominate women, whites want to dominate people of color, Israelis and some Jews want to dominate Palestinians and other Arabs. Moneyed people want to dominate people poorer than they are, and don’t want to pay fair taxes (which they see as taking away their privilege as lords-of-creation).

And for Jews who adore Israel to learn FACTS about the occupation or the much-damaged democracy would be to begin a very hurtful process of undoing loyalties and surrendering privileges (including the privilege of feeling good when people who criticize Israel are called anti-Semites).

what disengenuous snark from ‘anonymous jew’. no, i’m certain that thompson has no idea about what happened in europe in the 1930s-40s, britain having come out of the war completely unscathed. thankfully AJ is available to educate and remind thompson that every criticism of israel is a criticism of ‘the jews’, and criticism inevitably leads to mass murder. the psychological problem phil describes is much deeper than denial. i’ll bring up Englander’s short story collection ‘what we talk about when we talk about anne frank’ again. englander half-jokingly refers to this parlor game in an interview, the point of the exercise, according to him, is to evaluate and assign virtuousness to gentile friends. which is the righteous gentile who would risk all to hide you, and who would turn you in? that’s not really the point of the game though. the subtext of the exercise, of course, needs no analysis: the point is that every gentile has to be treated as a potential murderer. what does that mean for englander and others who think like him, sitting at dinner, ostensibly having an intimate exchange with friends, and yet the fundamental question about the ‘friend’ holding a glass of chardonay, smiling at you, is always ‘is he going to turn me in, or [as the game goes] will it be his wife?’ can an authentically empathic relationship ever grow between people under these conditions? does ‘englander’ even want the possibility of that time of relationship? or do jewish-gentile relations necessarily lead to the next holocaust, as the ultra-orthodox jew in the title short story suggests?

Jew this Jew that…

One has to stand up for something when one sees injustice

John Brown is an interesting case

someone commented on the situation in Israel is similar to the American Indian…RUBBISH…

Everyone knows about the travail of the Indian/Native American…when one travels north on I25 out of Santa Fe and approaches the Pojoaque Junction to Los Alamos the freeway is ruled by the Tribal Police and payments for violations go directly to the Tribe and are never reported…after mixed policies now it is a choice sovereignty or inclusion

I count 16 Congressional Medal of Honor winners who were Native Americans who fought with the US during the Indian Wars of 1870…Jeremiah Johnson ate the livers of Crow but the Crow were with the 7th Cavalry and the Crow were with Custer at Little Big Horn….it is mixed bag with the American Indian who fought on ALL sides of Wars before 1890

(perhaps the greatest film ever made documents the racist Ethan Edwards who speaks Comanche and knows the culture…made by a bunch of conservative white guys…the brother Martin Pawley is Cherokee…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woahas_W35A)

After 1890 the plight of the Native American has been well documented as have the exploits of Thorpe, Marine Ira Hayes, Code Talkers, Medal of Honor winner Marine Aviator Major Pappy Boyington (Sioux) leader of the Black Sheep Squadron in the South Pacific…

John Brown and his Army

400,000 Union Soldiers died to end exclusion because of race/culture and of that number 40,000 who died were BLACK Union soldiers…approximately one out of every 5 or 6 Black Union Soldiers

I think someone once said that All Men are Created Equal and Endowed by their Creator with certain Inalienable Rights, Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness

WE all have a history and it is not tied to Israel or Sumerian Tall Tales the Jews borrowed…and it is sick for the USA to be dragged through the gutter while Israel violates the basic rights of a neighboring culture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK4ufinuMWQ

Pete Seeger on John Brown

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jso1YRQnpCI&feature=related

There is another aspect to Anonymous English Jew’s downright nasty and disingenuous attack against Emma Thompson. As a Briton and a Londoner, she remembers another attack against Britain, started in 1940, when German planes dropped bombs on British cities and towns, and performers were barred from performing, due to cancelled shows and bombed-out theatres. We all know how that ended for Britain and for Europe. Tell me what is the difference between Anonymous English Jew’s blather-by-free-association and the above parody of it? From where I am standing, as a rational human being, they are one and the same.