News

I Want My NPT: A weekend review of Iran nuclear program propaganda

Two news reports by major wire services this weekend demonstrate just how pervasive misinformation and propaganda are in the mainstream media when it comes to the Iranian nuclear issue.

The first:

Reuters reported this week that Catherine Ashton, the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and chief nuclear negotiator for the P5+1, has high hopes for the new round of talks with Iran resuming May 23rd in Baghdad and will approach the meeting as a “serious set of discussions that can lead to concrete results.”

Sounds positive enough, especially when coupled with the statement Ashton made at the end of last month’s meeting in Istanbul. “We have agreed that the Non-Proliferation Treaty forms a key basis for what must be serious engagement, to ensure all the obligations under the NPT are met by Iran while fully respecting Iran’s right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy.”

However, another comment made by Ashton on Friday is cause for considerable concern. She told reporters in Brussels, “My ambition is that we come away with the beginning of the end of the nuclear weapons programme in Iran. I hope we’ll see the beginnings of success.”

Such a statement is certainly alarming. Despite the hysterical cries of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing acolytes here in the U.S.,  both  Western and Israeli intelligence, along with the IAEA, have consistently confirmed that Iran has no nuclear weapons program.

One would assume that the chief P5+1 negotiator would understand and acknowledge this simple – and vitally important – fact. Perhaps Ashton’s recent private audience with Netanyahu in Jerusalem was more dangerous and detrimental to the negotiations than one would even expect.

(Of course, the sheer absurdity of Ashton’s meeting with the Prime Minister of a state that is not a signatory of the NPT, has an undeclared stockpile of hundreds of nuclear warheads, is a constant violator of international law and perpetrator of war crimes, and which is in consistent breach of countless Security Council resolutions gos without saying. That Netanyahu would have any role whatsoever in these discussions, let alone issuing demands to both the U.S. government and Ashton herself, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt how designed for failure these negotiations were from the start.)

The second:

In one of the most embarrassing examples of published propaganda over the Iranian nuclear program to date, The Associated Press today “reported” that it has obtained an undated “computer-generated drawing” of “an explosives containment chamber of the type needed for nuclear arms-related tests that U.N. inspectors suspect Tehran has conducted” at its Parchin military complex.  The news agency says it was bequeathed this rendering “by an official of a country tracking Iran’s nuclear program who said it proves the structure exists.”

One version of the AP exclusive contains this detail:

That official said the image is based on information from a person who had seen the chamber at the Parchin military site, adding that going into detail would endanger the life of that informant. The official comes from an IAEA member country that is severely critical of Iran’s assertions that its nuclear activities are peaceful and asserts they are a springboard for making atomic arms.

What mysterious country could that possibly be, one wonders?!  The answer is so painfully obvious as to make AP scoopster George Jahn’s attempts at anonymity patently ridiculous and pathetic.  Jahn, unsurprisingly, has a long history of silly reporting on the Iran nuclear issue.

This detonation chamber stuff, by the way, has been debunked for half a year now.  

The story also notes that former IAEA official Olli Heinonen, who himself has a long history of pushing dubious information about Iran’s nuclear file, said that the computer graphic provided to the press is “‘very similar’ to a photo he recently saw that he believes to be the pressure chamber the IAEA suspects is at Parchin.”  Heinonen added that “even the colors of the computer-generated drawing matched that of the photo.”

Pretty convincing, huh?  Ok, here‘s the computer drawing this whole thing is about:

Iranpic

Yes, really.  That’s it.  Really.  No, please stop laughing and believe me.  That’s really the thing they’re talking about.  Yes, seriously.  I mean it.

These are the depths to which propaganda about the Iranian nuclear program have sunk.  It’s not even clever anymore, it’s just stupid.

Just in case anyone is interested, I have successfully uncovered the true identities of the crack Israeli computer graphics team that came up with that drawing:

Money for Nothing Music Video

This post originally appeared on Nima Shirazi’s blog Wide Asleep in America.

14 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I have a drawing of a unicorn. Only $110 a ride. Post the money now to reserve your place in the queue.

Ashton is not that cogent. I imagine she meant to say the beginning of the end of the nuclear weapons programme in Iran as an issue, or the issue of…. Slip of the tongue, that’s all. Most people like her are fed up to the back teeth with all this nonsense.

Nima, thanks for the report. It amazes me that few, if any, of the reports quoting the AP story mentioned how Israel fits the description of the source country. Also, how few articles mentioned that the graphic and the detailed description of the alleged facility may be inaccurate or falsified.

A rare exception is the Israeli journalist, Ron Ben-Yishai, (Hebrew only) who compared the computer graphic to Powell’s pictures of those mobile biological weapons laboratories. The photos that Powell showed at the UN Security Council in the run-up to the Iraq war. Ben-Yishai writes the graphic is worthless without a lot of additional information.
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4228636,00.html

The propaganda war is heating up. Here are some additional items.

A mysterious satellite photograph appeared last week which allegedly “proved” Iran was removing all evidence of the containment chamber in Parchin.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/05/09/Image-shows-more-activity-at-Iran-site/UPI-39941336585039/

MEK, the Iranian dissident group supported by the US and Israel, issued a report claiming that 60 Iranian scientists are working on nuclear weapons.
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=269634

Maybe this is pure coincidence but a IAEA weapons inspector was just killed in an automobile accident in Iran. There are no immediate indications of foul play.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/05/08/un-nuclear-inspector-killed-in-iranian-car-crash-report/

Great post Nima. And this type of unsubstantiated and inflammatory reporting about Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program has been going on in the MSM for close to 10 years.

RE: “[George] Jahn, unsurprisingly, has a long history of silly reporting on the Iran nuclear issue.” ~ Nima Shirazi

ALSO SEE: How Mossad Justified Its Murder of an Innocent Iranian Electrical Engineer, by Gareth Porter, TruthOut.org, 3/17/12

(excerpts)…The possibility that Mossad killed the wrong Iranian scientist cannot be completely ruled out. But almost immediately after his murder, Israel sought to justify the murder of Rezaeinejad by presenting him as working on the covert nuclear weapons program Israel had been claiming for years. Associated Press correspondent in Vienna George Jahn reported on July 28 that an anonymous official of an anonymous “member state” of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) told him Rezaeinejad had been participating in “developing high voltage switches,” which he described as “a key component in setting off the explosives needed to trigger a nuclear warhead.”. . .
…Two months later, on September 19, Jahn and his anonymous source from the unnamed member state were back at it again, this time with a purported “intelligence summary” claiming to identify the researcher who had allegedly collaborated with Rezaeinejad…
…Finally, the intelligence summary claimed that Rezaeinejad was not an electrical engineer at all, but a “physicist” who had worked for the Iranian defense ministry on not only high-voltage switches, but also on other projects linked to nuclear weapons development – which it did not identify.
But an investigation into the Rezaeinejad case reveals that Israel had used the AP’s Jahn to carry out a deliberate disinformation campaign about the victim to justify his murder. Rezaeinejad left a record of published research which makes it very clear that he was indeed an electrical engineer, rather than a physicist, and that he had been working on basic electrical power engineering technologies…

ENTIRE ARTICLE – http://www.truth-out.org/how-mossad-justified-its-murder-innocent-iranian-electrical-engineer/1331747276