News

U. of Haifa stops Nakba commemoration, as prof writes hate post calling for ‘Many Nakbas’

Ha’aretz (Hebrew only) and Ynet (English, short) reported that school officials prohibited a Nakba commemoration on campus at the University of Haifa on Wednesday. The school cancelled the event just three hours prior to the time it was scheduled to begin. This was after the students had obtained all the necessary permissions.

(Note the similar uproar at Tel Aviv University, where a commemoration went off but with massive protest.)

In place of the planned event, students and faculty demonstrated outside the university to protest what they said was suppression of free speech.  The number of participants at the demonstration was not reported. Two protesters, a Palestinian student and a Jewish professor, pointed to the hypocrisy of school officials who continually praise the University for being a multicultural institution but actually suppress the rights of minority students.

The school says that it stopped the commemoration because the flyers that were distributed by the students describe an event that was different than the event they had permitted.  The student organizers deny this.

A similar last-minute cancellation occurred in December when students attempted to stage a protest on the third anniversary of the Israeli invasion of Gaza.  School authorities also cited discrepancies between the proposed plans and the publicity for that last-minute cancellation.

Saar Szekely, the TV reality star from the Israeli “Big Brother” who became an overnight sensation because of his criticism of the occupation, was scheduled to participate.  His appearance was cancelled.

Professor Steven Plaut teaches economics at the University of Haifa.  He is an American-born Israeli who received his doctorate at Princeton. He posted an anti-Palestinian, Nakba-denying screed at the settler web site, Arutz Sheva.  The piece is titled “Happy Nakba Day!”

The following are some of the Professor’s startlingly racist recommendations for Nabka greeting cards:

-One, two, three, MANY Nabkbas!
-A little Nakba never hurt anyone!
-Remove the illegal Palestinian settlements sitting on Jewish land!
-Two-state solution:  One for the Jews and One for the Kurds, but none for the Arabs who live down the Lane
-Bulldoze an anarcho-fascist today!
-Help the Palestinian prisoners maintain their hunger strike!
-Don’t wall them out ­ Fence them In!
-When this drone is a rockin’, we’ll come a-knockin’!!
-We switched your 72 virgins with a 72 year -old virgin!

If the University of Haifa wants to discourage speech which is deleterious to the general welfare of the institution, it obviously would be better off reprimanding Dr. Plaut, than obstructing the students and faculty who organized the Nakba event.

66 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

One wonders what this piece of filth, Plaut, would say if some neo-Nazi were to make similar comments regarding the Holocaust. It is an absolute shame that these people are justifying Hitler. Not Hitler’s opinions, of course, but his existence. We can now point to Plaut and say that Hilter was not an abberation, or a monster, or even special. He was just able to obtain power. His type of thinking and hate exists everywhere, even in someone like Plaut who is a generation or two from the Holocaust.

A professor? Even their intellectuals are madman.

RE: “The following are some of the Professor’s [Steven Plaut’s] startlingly racist recommendations for Nabka greeting cards: -One, two, three, MANY Nabkbas! -A little Nakba never hurt anyone! ” ~ Ira Glunts

MY COMMENT: This is an excellent example of how über-nationalism can make even an economics professor with a doctorate from Princeton act like a juvenile delinquent.

FROM GEORGE ORWELL, “Notes on Nationalism” (1945):

[EXCERPTS] . . . By ‘nationalism’ I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions of people can be confidently labelled ‘good’ or ‘bad’.[1] But secondly—and this is much more important—I mean the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognising no other duty than that of advancing its interests. . .
. . . Nationalism, in the extended sense in which I am using the word, includes such movements and tendencies as Communism, political Catholicism, Zionism, Antisemitism, Trotskyism and Pacifism. It does not necessarily mean loyalty to a government or a country, still less to one’s own country, and it is not even strictly necessary that the units in which it deals should actually exist. To name a few obvious examples, Jewry, Islam, Christendom, the Proletariat and the White Race are all of them objects of passionate nationalistic feeling: but their existence can be seriously questioned, and there is no definition of any one of them that would be universally accepted. . .
. . .it is important not to confuse nationalism with mere worship of success. The nationalist does not go on the principle of simply ganging up with the strongest side. On the contrary, having picked his side, he persuades himself that it is the strongest, and is able to stick to his belief even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him. Nationalism is power-hunger tempered by self-deception. Every nationalist is capable of the most flagrant dishonesty, but he is also—since he is conscious of serving something bigger than himself—unshakeably certain of being in the right. . .
. . .All nationalists have the power of not seeing resemblances between similar sets of facts. A British Tory will defend self-determination in Europe and oppose it in India with no feeling of inconsistency. Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage — torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians — which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side. . . 
. . . The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them. . .

• SOURCE: “Notes on Nationalism”, by George Orwell – http://www.literaturecollection.com/a/orwell/467/

Plaut has been writing such filfth for years. Not only is he morally repulsive, he is a compulsive liar. He repeatedly called for using live ammunition to slaughter the weekly protesters at Bil’in.