California academics: State assembly resolution on Palestine activism ‘poses clear threat’ to academic freedom

ActivismUS Politics
on 6 Comments
Irvine A security officer removes a student who disrupted the Israeli ambassador’s speech at the Irvine campus of the University of California  (Photo:

A group of California academics have slammed the recent move by the state legislature to pass a bill on alleged anti-Semitism on campus.

The open letter, from California Scholars for Academic Freedom, blasts the resolution (HR 35) for posing “a clear threat to academic freedom in the University of California and the California State University systems,” undermining the First Amendment and conflating “criticism of Israel or its policies with anti-semitism.”

The letter was posted by the US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, and is signed by over 30 scholars working in California.

“The driving concern behind House Resolution 35 is not anti-semitism. Indeed, HR-35 itself is fundamentally anti-semitic because it associates and conflates with Judaism an unending list of well-documented racist policies and crimes against humanity committed by the state of Israel,” the slashing letter reads. “Far from the worthy goal of fighting real anti-semitism, this resolution was written to serve the propaganda aims of the government of Israel at the expense of constitutionally protected rights of California residents.”

The pushback on HR 35 comes about two weeks after it was easily passed, with no debate, in the California Assembly. The resolution, which was drafted with the help of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, encourages colleges to ensure that “no public resources will be allowed to be used for anti-Semitic or any intolerant agitation.” Among the examples the resolution lists as being anti-Semitic is languaging describing Israel as an apartheid state; criticizing Israel of ethnic cleansing; and the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

After HR 35 was harshly criticized by Palestine solidarity activists and free speech advocates, Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal promised that she would introduce a bill affirming free speech rights on campus. Lowenthal’s statement was hailed by student activists and other advocates.

Meanwhile, a California State University (CSU) spokesman says that the college “supported the resolution as it serves to promote tolerance and embrace diversity on campuses.”

While much of the fight over Palestine activism has focused on the University of California, the separate CSU system has also been the site of controversy. One mathematics professor, David Klein, was targeted by the AMCHA Initiative, an Israel advocacy group focusing on college campuses, for expressing support for the BDS movement on a website hosted by CSU. After a public campaign to open an investigation into Klein, the California Attorney General rejected a request to investigate Klein.

A number of CSU scholars signed the open letter blasting HR 35, and now Klein is speaking out against his university’s support for the resolution.

“If implemented by the California State University system, California’s Assembly House Resolution 35 would prohibit on any CSU campus criticisms of the government of Israel,” said Klein, in a statement e-mailed to Mondoweiss. “The CSU administration’s support of HR-35 is not only a direct assault against academic freedom and the First Amendment, it reveals a deep-seated anti-Arab racism and antipathy toward the Palestinian people, who are the victims of Israel’s ethnic cleansing and apartheid system of laws.”

About Alex Kane

Alex Kane is a freelance journalist who focuses on Israel/Palestine and civil liberties. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

6 Responses

  1. American
    September 10, 2012, 4:33 pm

    from the Klein link…

    ““The larger issue for the pro-Israel groups is that they don’t want to allow the criticism of Israel to be public if they can stop it,” Klein explained. “On a level playing field, in a debate or in a situation where all facts can be aired, they would lose.
    So the only way to win is to silence debate.”

    Yes indeed ….that is why they try to censor…they know they would lose a fair debate.

  2. DICKERSON3870
    September 10, 2012, 4:57 pm

    RE: “Far from the worthy goal of fighting real anti-semitism, this resolution was written to serve the propaganda aims of the government of Israel at the expense of constitutionally protected rights of California residents.” ~ California Scholars for Academic Freedom

    MY COMMENT: This yet another reason I fear that Revisionist Zionism and Likudnik Israel (specifically by virtue of their inordinate sway over the U.S.) might very well be an “existential threat” to the values of The Enlightenment ! ! !

    • ALSO SEE: “How We Became Israel”, By Andrew J. Bacevich, The American Conservative, 9/10/12
    LINK –
    • AND SEE: ‘Israelis are helping write US laws, fund US campaigns, craft US war policy’, by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss, 6/30/12
    LINK –
    • AND SEE: “America Adopts the Israel Paradigm”, by Philip Ghiraldi,, 7/05/12
    LINK –
    • AND SEE: “Report: Israeli model underlies militarization of U.S. police”, By Muriel Kane, Raw Story, 12/04/11
    LINK –
    • AND SEE: “David Yerushalmi, Islam-Hating White Supremacist Inspires Anti-Sharia Bills Sweeping Tea Party Nation”, by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam, 3/02/11
    LINK –
    • AND SEE: “Boston airport security program rife with racial profiling has Israeli links”, by Alex Kane, Mondoweiss, 8/14/12
    LINK –

    • P.S. AND HERE’S YET ANOTHER THREAT TO THE VALUES OF ‘THE ENLIGHTENMENT’: “US Religious Right Propelling Homophobia in African Countries”, by Common Dreams, 7/24/12
    LINK –

    • DICKERSON3870
      September 10, 2012, 5:19 pm

      P.P.S. ALSO SEE: “The Trial of Israel’s Campus Critics”, by David Theo Goldberg & Saree Makdisi, Tikkun Magazine, September/October 2009

      [EXCERPT]. . . It is an extraordinary fact that no fewer than thirty-three distinct organizations – including AIPAC, the Zionist Organization of America, the American Jewish Congress, and the Jewish National Fund – are gathered together today as members or affiliates of the Israel on Campus Coalition. The coalition is an overwhelmingly powerful presence on American college campuses for which there is simply no equivalent on the Palestinian or Arab side. Its self-proclaimed mission is not merely to monitor our colleges and universities. That, after all, is the commitment of Campus Watch, which was started by pro-Israel activists in 2002. It is, rather (and in its own words), to generate “a pro-active, pro-Israel agenda on campus.”
      There is, accordingly, disproportionate and unbalanced intervention on campuses across the country by a coalition of well-funded organizations, who have no time for — and even less interest in — the niceties of intellectual exchange and academic process. Insinuation, accusation, and defamation have become the weapons of first resort to respond to argument and criticism directed at Israeli policies. As far as these outside pressure groups (and their campus representatives) are concerned, the intellectual and academic price that the scholarly community pays as a result of this kind of intervention amounts to little more than collateral damage. . .


  3. Shingo
    September 10, 2012, 6:04 pm

    They should challenge this resolution to investigate if it’s constitutional. And when it is found to be in violation of the Constitution, it can then be demonstrated that Israel is an affront to American values.

  4. Mondowise
    September 10, 2012, 6:39 pm

    HR 35 does not support tolerance and diversity, it supports absolute INtolerance of our constitutional rights and decreases diversity of thought. leave it to the histrionic hasbara minions to take the truth and twist it until it pukes out the opposite, cached in a ‘positive’ tone of utter falsity.

  5. dbroncos
    September 10, 2012, 7:32 pm

    Thanks, Alex.
    I hope I/P activist students in California don’t waste any time in making themselves known on their respective campuses with very public and creative forms of protest that prominantly feature the BDS initiative and Israeli apartheid and fascism. Now is the time to challenge this bill aggressively especially with the use of the forbidden language (BDS, apartheid) This is a great opportunity to turn the tables on Zionists in California by making a mockery out of their attempts to silence critics of Israel. This could turn into a PR bonanza for I/P activists and a PR disaster for Zionists.

Leave a Reply