Newsweek: From ‘Black Rage’ to ‘Muslim Rage’

“Rage” is all the rage with Newsweek, apparently. For comparison:

Newsweek 1985
Newsweek cover, August 19, 1985
Newsweek
Newsweek cover for September 24, 2012
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

what’s missing?

“Signs of Zionist reform”

Yes Ali
Rage is bad. The rage that swallowed up one million lives in Iraq and threw away one million lives as destitute in foreign lands and would create one million deformed babies following 911.
You may not remember Ali when the free world leader informed ” We dont make distinction between who are terrorist and who harbour them ” .Very soon they will be called victims of collateral damages.See what words can do .It can unmask barbarity like it did in Libya and it can mask barbarity as the FOX and WSJ and NYT have done over the years
May be Ali you can travel to a mosque in Pakistan and hear a raging sermon and compare its effects to that of every lies that have come out of your favorite media back then and continues to day.This time against Iran with chilling effects on innocent human beings like the one on you only on a larger scale .

911 unfolded the rage here in the West killing Sikhs and hurling bombs to mosques and manufacturing Sharia controveries and a lot more.
Back then the rage urged to convert the muslims and rage the Mecca to the grounds. Back then the rage told Rumsfiled that he would drain the swamps. Collective rage also allowed his stupid and illegal idea of waging wars against Iraq on the basis of having good targets go unchallenged. It was the collective rage that allowed Frum to coin that sinsiter phrase of “Axes of Evil”with disatrous effects on humanity . He now lectures on CNN how to bring freedom of expression in muslim lands conveneintly forgetting how he would have smothered anybody who would have dared to challenge his pathetic purpose-driven lies .As for Nathayoo so was for him 911 was not bad. he got a chance to direct emotions to those countries that Natanhyoo like him did not like . Rage can bring miraculous opportunity for some Just watch Mc Cain or other warmongers on FOX.
Lying is freedom but rebuttal is shown the door with vengeance. A war monger like Barak and Nathanhoo get a free pass in the name of freedom of expresiion and freedom of media but one never hears what the other side has to offer or explain.

The glorious rage began in 1857 against British over the introduction of beef and pork in the food of theIndian soldiers but it was not about the food.It was about what British wrought to that part of the world from 1750s to 1850s. The rage that followed Rodney King was not about that particular police brutality. It was about the daily experience of every black.

The US government has done a lot of terrible things: supported (and installed) repressive regimes around the world, invaded other countries, and threatened death and destruction around the world.

Now a idiotic little film about Muhammad is circulating and offending Moslems. The US govt claims they had nothing to do with the film. That’s almost certainly true.

But at this point, many people just won’t believe the US govt (and the mainstream media). The govt has blown its credibility so badly that…

…the US govt isn’t believed, even when it is telling the truth (!!!!)

I see. It’s their “Newsweek” title: changed into diapositive, and the serifs are gone.