There’s a great piece on refugees in the Times of Israel, by the Israeli son of Egyptian Jewish refugees. Daniel Haboucha rejects the recent effort by Israel’s deputy foreign minister Danny Ayalon to tie the Jewish refugees’ plight to that of the Palestinians refugees created by the Nakba in 1948. Haboucha concludes, “Danny Ayalon does not speak for me.”
The first paragraphs I excerpt call both refugee groups “victims of Zionism.” The last paragraph addresses my mother’s question to me, Why didn’t the Arab states absorb the Palestinian refugees?
[E]fforts to equate my “plight” today with the plight of a Palestinian of my age who grew up in a refugee camp (mere kilometers from my beautiful Jerusalem apartment) are manifestly absurd….
in drawing a direct parallel between the Jews who were forcibly dispossessed by Arab governments and the Palestinians, the Israeli government finally appears to be acknowledging its role in creating the Palestinian refugee crisis, with all of the political and diplomatic consequences this implies…. Israel’s founders knew long before 1948 that the establishment of a Jewish state in the heart of the Arab world would spell catastrophe for the Jews living in the region. In declaring Judaism to be a nationality, Zionism transformed Jews in Arab countries from members of a deeply rooted religious minority into “enemy nationals.” When made aware of the impending danger faced by the Jews of Iraq in the 1940s due to mounting hostility toward Zionism, David Ben Gurion felt responsible for the harm he suspected would befall them; he referred to these Arab Jews as potential “victims” of the Zionist movement (quoted in Meir-Glitzenstein “Zionism in an Arab Country” p. 140)….
Ayalon and his supporters note, correctly, that the Palestinian refugee problem could have been similarly put to rest had there been political will to integrate the refugees into other countries. In advancing this argument, however, Ayalon (himself the son of an Algerian refugee) fundamentally misunderstands — or willfully ignores — the nature of the problem. The Palestinian Nakba, as [Yehouda] Shenhav notes, is not a historic individual trauma rooted in personal loss; rather it is the ongoing, collective trauma of an entire nation being dispossessed of its homeland. Proposed solutions that fail to acknowledge and address this cannot hope to resolve the issue. While Jewish refugees have little interest in returning to their former homes (many Arab countries have indeed already invited them to return), Palestinian refugees are seeking collective redress through repatriation or remedial self-determination.
Great to hear an Israeli Jew say all this. A victim speaking up for himself and for
the Palestinian victims of Zionism.
Would be better if a high-ranking founding-father-type would say it. You know, the guys who perpetrated the great robbery and who orchestrated the displacement of Palestinians out and of Jews from Arab countries in.
That isn’t all.
Israel desperately wanted Jews to leave Arab states and come to Israel. They were needed to fill the empty lands left by the departed Palestinians, and prevent the Palestinians from realizing the right of return promised by the UN.
Israel made great efforts to make this happen, including recruiting native Jews to make terrorist provocations in Arab countries. This definitely happened in Egypt, and has been alleged to have happened in Iraq. But beyond that, there was a tremendous public relations campaign.
That is not to say that there weren’t injustices committed both by Arab governments and private citizens. However, there is a vivid contrast between Palestinian and Jewish refugees. Israel really wanted the former to leave, and the latter to come.
@- Philip Weiss,
You linked Rachel Corrie to Anne Frank, so what’s the FF-ing difference?
Anne Frank hid from the Germans and spend most of her time holed up in the attic of a non-destroyed home in Amsterdam, but Rachel Corrie went to Germany to face a Tiger Tank and was crushed by it. Get your priorities straight. Honor to whom honor belongs.
Last and final message.
P.S. Obama will win the election and Iran will not be attacked.
Jonathan Cook @- http://www.jkcook.net/Articles3/0597.htm#Top :
“This month, the Israeli foreign ministry and US Jewish organisations formally launched the initiative, staging a conference in New York a few days before the opening sessions of the General Assembly. Israel’s choice of arena – the UN – is not accidental. The campaign is chiefly designed to stifle the move announced by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in his General Assembly speech last week to begin seeking UN status for Palestine as a non-member state. After opposition from the US forced the Palestinians to abort their bid for statehood at the UN Security Council last year, Mr Abbas is expected to delay making his new request until November, after the US presidential election campaign to avoid embarrassing President Barack Obama. Mr Abbas’s move has spurred Israel to take the offensive. Anyone who doubts that the Israeli government’s concern for Arab Jews is entirely cynical only has to trace the campaign’s provenance. It was considered for the first time in 2009, when Mr Netanyahu was forced – under pressure from Mr Obama – to deliver a speech backing Palestinian statehood. Immediately afterwards, Mr Netanyahu asked the National Security Council, whose role includes assessing strategic threats posed by the Palestinians, to weigh the merits of championing the Arab Jews’ case in international forums. The NSC’s advice is that Arab Jews, known in Israel as Mizrahim and comprising a small majority of the total Jewish population, should be made a core issue in the peace process. As Israel knows, that creates a permanent stumbling block to an agreement. The NSC has proposed impossible demands: contrition from all Arab states before a peace deal with the Palestinians can be reached; a decoupling of refugee status and the right of return; and the right of Arab Jews to greater compensation than Palestinian refugees, based on their superior wealth. Israel is working on other fronts too to undermine the case for Palestinian refugees. Its US lobbyists are demanding that UNRWA, the UN agency for the refugees, be dismantled. And bipartisan pressure is mounting in the US Congress to count as refugees only Palestinians personally displaced from their homes in 1948, stripping millions of descendants of their status.”
RE: “Israel’s founders knew long before 1948 that the
establishment of a Jewish state in the heart of the Arab world would spell catastrophe for the Jews living in the region. In declaring Judaism to be a nationality [what Uri Avnery calls the “white lie” – J.L.D.], Zionism transformed Jews in Arab countries from members of a deeply rooted religious minority into ‘enemy nationals’.” ~ Daniel Haboucha
MORE ON ZIONISM’S “WHITE LIE” FROM URI AVNERY (VIA BERNARD AVISHAI), Feb. 2010:
SOURCE – http://bernardavishai.blogspot.com/2010_02_01_archive.html