Why Netanyahu put the brakes on his plan to build in E1

Israel/PalestineUS Politics
on 5 Comments
The Jerusalem-area settlement of Ma’ale Adumim (Photo: Ammar Awad/Reuters)

The contentious plan to build in the E1 corridor has been put on hold for now. The reason? Forging ahead with the plan would do irrevocable damage to Israel’s worldwide image and spark international consternation at a time when Israel needs Western support. But at the same time, a building approval binge has taken place in other areas in Jerusalem.

As blogger and academic Michael Koplow noted, Ynet News reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has put the brakes on construction in E1, the name given to the strip of land linking Jerusalem with the illegal settlement of Ma’ale Adumim. The planned moves for E1 garnered international attention and outrage due to the fact that building there would be the “fatal heart attack” to the two-state solution, inasmuch as it would effectively bisect the West Bank and cut off access to Jerusalem for West Bank Palestinians. (Though I should note Ma’ale Adumim does a good job at that by itself, as Larry Derfner showed in Foreign Policy.)

The E1 “blueprints were approved by the Defense Minister Ehud Barak, but the Prime Minister’s Office then ordered not to file them with the zoning committee at this time,” reported YNet last week.

Someone’s attuned to international opinion in Netanyahu’s government. After the E1 building plans were announced as a punitive measure following the Palestinians’ status upgrade at the United Nations, European nations reacted with anger. European states also took some mild action, like summoning Israeli ambassadors for explanation of the move. And European states started contemplating the use of sanctions on Israel if they went ahead with the project, though the leaks to Israeli media were likely a warning rather than something Europe was seriously contemplating.

American Jewish groups have also weighed in. As Allison Deger reported yesterday, over 700 Jewish rabbis, cantors and rabbinical students signed a letter in protest of the plans for E1 and delivered it to the Israeli prime minister’s office. This move, coordinated by J Street and Americans for Peace Now, followed earlier cries of protest from those groups.

Moving ahead with E1 plans now would do some damage to Israel’s relations with the U.S. and Europe, as well as the ability of American Jewish groups to effectively explain Israel’s position. The two-state solution remains an article of faith for advocacy inside the Jewish organizational world, but that advocacy would become untenable if E1 was built.

The delay in plans to build for E1 comes in the midst of an Israeli election season which has seen the meteoric rise of the right, specifically the rise of Naftali Bennett and his party, the Jewish Home party. A member of the HaBayit HaYehudi (Jewish Home) party criticized the decision to halt the E1 project last week. “The halting of the E1 plans by the Prime Minister’s Office proves that Netanyahu’s statements regarding the settlements are only sleight-of-hand. A day after the elections we’ll rediscover the true Netanyahu, the one who froze construction and succumbed to pressure,” said Member of Knesset Uri Ariel, a member of the Jewish Home party.

So Netanyahu has made a calculation: allowing some votes on his right to be lost is the price to pay for keeping cordial relations with Europe, the U.S. and Jewish communities in the West. And HaBayit HaYehudi, whose leader advocates for annexing Area C of the West Bank, is banking on the fact that the delay in E1 will help them win votes. Still, Netanyahu is likely to be keep the prime minister’s seat after this month’s elections, and so it remains unlikely that construction in E1 will forge ahead.

But just as the world’s attention was honing in on E1, the floodgates for other illegal Jerusalem settlements flew open. The Associated Press reported December 27 that “Israel is planning its biggest construction surge in east Jerusalem in decades in a move that critics argue would cement its grip on the contested territory…The planned construction contributes to completing a ring of Jewish areas around the Arab inner core of east Jerusalem, making it more difficult to one day link it to the West Bank, which surrounds the city on three sides.”

The organization Terrestrial Jerusalem, run by expert Daniel Seidemann (who believes that Netanyahu will in fact forge ahead with E1 plans before the elections, contra me and Koplow), has details on this settlement binge. On the day before Christmas, the Jerusalem Regional Planning Committee approved plans to build new illegal settlements “on the southwest slopes of the settlement of Gilo, between the current footprint of Gilo and the Palestinian town of Beit Jala and the beleaguered village of Wallajeh, whose residents are fighting Israeli demolitions orders against many of their homes, as well as facing near-total isolation due to the route of the barrier through their lands,” according to Seidemann’s organization. “The planned units are, in their entirety, to be located beyond the built-up area of the settlement of Gilo, expanding the footprint of this already massive settlement to the southwest….[This plan] will further complicate final status arrangements in Jerusalem. This plan is not merely about expanding construction inside an existing settlement – it is about significantly expanding the settlement in the direction of the neighboring West Bank towns.”

Other settlement plans explained by Terrestrial Jerusalem include approval for a new settlement called Givat Hamatos–which would be the first new settlement in Jerusalem since construction of Har Homa near Bethlehem.

Netanyahu is not able to get away with building in the E1 corridor. That remains a step too far for the world to ignore. But when it comes to other, less well-known settlements, there’s no problem. And so while E1 won’t be able to fatally kill the possibility of a Palestinian state, the quiet building in other areas of Jerusalem will do just the same.

About Alex Kane

Alex Kane is a freelance journalist who focuses on Israel/Palestine and civil liberties. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

5 Responses

  1. Avi_G.
    January 9, 2013, 8:42 am

    Look at the map in this link:


    The 1949 Armistice Line is the renowned Green Line. Everything to the right of that dotted line is internationally recognized as illegally occupied land.

    The blue-colored line is the area that Israel unilaterally annexed into Jerusalem’s so-called municipal boundaries after it occupied the West Bank.

    The Israeli Apartheid Wall follows the blue-colored line.

    It’s clear that Israel plans to build in E1 as the path of the wall indicates. Otherwise, in Israeli calculations, the illegal colony of Ma’ale Adomim would be isolated.

    This E-1 corridor controversy is much ado about … very little.

    Area E-1 is a sliver of land that sits in the occupied East Jerusalem bottleneck of what Israel claims it will eventually hand over to a Palestinian state.

    But the bottleneck was created because Israel has already made the rest of occupied East Jerusalem off limits to a future Palestinian state.

  2. pabelmont
    January 9, 2013, 9:25 am

    The bottom line, for me, and I’d hope for all right-thinking-people (so to speak), not that I dictate to anyone, is that ALL the settlements are illegal and ALL should be dismantled (and the wall, too) and all the settlers removed FOR SO LONG AS THE OCCUPATION CONTINUES.

    Period. There is no other LEGAL way to regard all this.

    So the international consternation about “E-1” arises from a HORRIBLE sense that a 2-state-peace can be rescued without removal of all (or most) settlers and settlements. The internationals want peace but what they really want is peace-without-trouble-for-themselves and thus they make only such “waves” (e.g., about “E-1”) as they can do [1] with words alone and [2] without offending USA.


    • Mooser
      January 10, 2013, 3:09 pm

      As an aside, I wonder what the Zionist government tells residents in the illegal settlements about their legality, safety and permanence? What do their “deeds” or “leases” look like?

  3. seafoid
    January 10, 2013, 11:48 am

    And this week the cost of spending all that infrastructure money on settlers instead of behind the Green Line showed.

    It’s as if the Jinn called Palestine who is still there beneath all that Jewish concrete got some revenge in.


    Israel’s poor infrastructure magnified storm’s damage, officials say

    The storms continued to rage across Israel for a third day Wednesday, dropping rain, sleet and snow, with more in store for Thursday.

    But government officials and businesses were already at work toting up the cost of the damage and assigning blame to infrastructure they said failed to hold up under pressure from the biggest winter storm to hit in a decade.

    The drainage system that encompasses the Ayalon Highway covers a large area of the coastal plain, and can handle volumes of up to 400 cubic meters of water per second, but this limit was exceeded Tuesday, with 440 cubic meters of water flowing per second, flooding the highway. Experts said a capacity of 600 cubic meters per second would be required to prevent flooding. But it isn’t possible to deepen the channel along the current route, and in any case an additional railway line planned will further limit drainage capacity.

    Meanwhile, the Manufacturers Association estimated storm damage to the business sector at NIS 300 million as of Tuesday. Roughly half this amount, it said, was the direct result of employees missing work due to blocked roads, particularly the Ayalon Highway, according to estimates by the association’s economic research department.

  4. amigo
    January 11, 2013, 9:21 am

    Related story from Haaretz,,

    Palestinians erect tent city in E-1 to protest settlement construction
    Police block off area; group behind the protest in the E-1 corridor, between Jerusalem and Ma’ale Adumim in the West Bank, says it will not leave until ‘Palestinian owners of this land are allowed to realize their right to it.’

    Reported today .

    So the first “legal” settlers are building in the State of Palestine.

    link http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/palestinians-erect-tent-city-in-e-1-to-protest-settlement-construction.premium-1.493451

    Oh happy days.

Leave a Reply