News

Netanyahu says Palestinians must recognize ‘the Jewish state’ for peace (and then says even that isn’t enough)

Yesterday Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned to Bar Ilan University, where in 2009 he gave a speech that many reference to show his support for the two-state solution, and made it clear that a peace deal will not be happening on his watch. You can watch video of the speech above (starting around 51:00) and here is the Haaretz summary:

Almost four and half years after he stood at the podium at Bar-Ilan University and delivered a moderate speech in which he recognized for the first time the two-state solution, Netanyahu returned to the same spot to give a hawkish address in which he did everything except announce that he is reneging on his agreement in principle to Palestinian statehood.

“Unless the Palestinians recognize the Jewish state and give up on the right of return there will not be peace,” he said in his address.

The prime minister went on to say that even if they do agree to these conditions, it will not be sufficient. “After generations of incitement we have no confidence that such recognition will percolate down to the Palestinian people,” he said. “That is why we need extremely strong security arrangements and to go forward, but not blindly.”

The centerpiece of Netanyahu’s speech was the insistence that Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish state. From the speech:

During my speech here four years ago, I said that the solution is a demilitarized Palestinian state. The reason for demilitarization is clear to everyone in light of our experience – true and ongoing demilitarization with very clear security arrangements and no international forces. But a Jewish state – recognize the Jewish state. Why are you not willing to recognize the Jewish state? We are willing to recognize your nation state, and that is at great cost – it involves territories, our ancestral lands, which is not insignificant. And I say this as well – this is a very difficult thing. But you need to make a series of concessions too and the first concession is to give up your dream of the right of return. We will not be satisfied with recognition of the Israeli people or of some kind of binational state which will later be flooded by refugees. This is the nation state of the Jewish people. If they want, Jews immigrate to this country. Palestinian Arabs, if they want, will go there. Recognize the Jewish state. As long as you refuse to do so, there will never be peace. Recognize our right to live here in our own sovereign state, our nation state – only then will peace be possible.

I emphasize this here – this is an essential condition.

Although, as Haaretz points out above, even that wouldn’t be enough for Netanyahu because be basically thinks Palestinians hate Israelis too much to be trusted. Twitter user Joel Braunold summarized the speech as such:


The Institute for Middle East Understanding has put together a useful resource on the Israeli demand to recognize the “Jewish state,” and why to Palestinians this means asking them to agree to their own displacement and dispossession:

WHY DO PALESTINIANS OPPOSE RECOGNIZING ISRAEL AS A JEWISH STATE?

  • Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state means de facto endorsing Israel’s institutionalized discrimination against Palestinian Arab and other non-Jewish citizens of the state, who comprise approximately 20% of the population, about 1.6 million people. (See below for more on institutionalized discrimination against non-Jewish citizens of Israel.)
  • Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state means effectively renouncing the internationally recognized right of return of Palestinian refugees expelled from their homes and land during Israel’s creation in 1948. (See here for more on the right of return.)
  • Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state means endorsing an ideological narrative that denies and distorts Palestinian history, and seeks to subordinate fundamental Palestinian human rights for the benefit of Israeli Jews.

WHY DOES THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT INSIST THE PALESTINIANS RECOGNIZE ISRAEL AS A JEWISH STATE?

  • The demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as a “Jewish state” is rooted in an Israeli desire to maintain a Jewish majority state, in which Jews enjoy rights and privileges not granted to non-Jewish citizens, in a region that is predominantly Arab. The Israelis hope that by getting Palestinians to officially recognize Israel as a Jewish state in a peace agreement they can effectively negate the Palestinian right of return and legitimize in advance whatever discriminatory legal measures they may take in the future to ensure a Jewish majority, as well as current ones.
  • For the hardline Netanyahu, who boasted following his first term in office (1996-1999) that he “de facto put an end to the Oslo Accords,” insisting Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state is also potentially a way to sabotage any negotiations while placing the blame on the Palestinians for being rejectionist. (See here for more on Netanyahu’s views on the two-state solution and peace with the Palestinians.)

ORIGINS OF THE DEMAND

  • Israel has not insisted that any country in the world, including the United States and the two neighboring Arab countries Israel has peace treaties with, Egypt and Jordan, recognize it as a Jewish state.
  • In 1988, the PLO recognized the state of Israel. This was a historic compromise on the part of the Palestinians, who effectively renounced claim to 78% of historic Palestine. (See map here.) In 1993, the PLO and the government of Israel exchanged official letters in which the Palestinians again formally recognized “the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security.”
  • The demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as a “Jewish state” was not part of the original Oslo peace process during the 1990s, only first appearing in 2001 when officials in the Bush administration began mentioning it. Prior to that, Palestinians had only been asked to agree to Israel’s existence as a state. Only in 2007 did Israeli officials begin demanding that the Palestinians formally recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
  • President Barack Obama adopted President George W. Bush’s support for the new requirement of the Palestinians, publicly calling on Palestinians to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

INSTITUTIONALIZED DISCRIMINATION AGAINST NON-JEWISH CITIZENS OF ISRAEL

  • The 2012 State Department country report on Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, released in April 2013, noted that Palestinian citizens of Israel suffer from “institutional and societal discrimination… in particular in access to equal education and employment opportunities.”
  • While Palestinian Arabs comprise approximately 20% of the population of Israel (about 1.6 million people), as non-Jews they are confined by law and zoning policies to just 3.5% of the land. Approximately 93% of the land in Israel is owned either by the state or by quasi-governmental agencies, such as the Jewish National Fund, which discriminate against non-Jews. Palestinian citizens of Israel face significant legal obstacles in accessing land for agriculture, residential, or commercial development.
  • Since Israel’s establishment in 1948, approximately 600 new municipalities have been created for Jewish communities, while only a handful have been created for non-Jews.
  • Tens of thousands of Bedouin and other non-Jewish citizens of Israel live in villages that aren’t recognized by the state or provided basic services like water or electricity. As many as 70,000 Bedouin citizens of Israel currently face eviction from their ancestral lands in the Negev desert, part of the so-called “Prawer plan” to “Judaize” the area.
  • Israeli government resources are disproportionately directed to Jews, a major factor in causing Palestinian citizens of Israel to suffer the lowest living standards in Israeli society by all socio-economic indicators.
  • Government funding for Arab schools is far below that of Jewish schools. According to the 2012 State Department country report on Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, released in April 2013: “Resources devoted to Arabic education were inferior to those devoted to Hebrew education in the public education system, leading some Arabs in ethnically mixed cities to study in Hebrew instead.”
  • There are more than 50 Israeli laws that privilege Jews or discriminate against non-Jews. These laws affect everything from immigration and family reunification to land ownership rights. They include:
    • The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law prevents Palestinians from the occupied territories who are married to Palestinian citizens of Israel from gaining residency or citizenship status in Israel. This law forces thousands of Palestinian citizens of Israel to either leave Israel or live apart from their families. In January 2012, the Israeli Supreme Court upheld the law against a challenge, with one justice writing, “Human rights are not a prescription for national suicide.” In an editorial, the respected liberal Israeli daily Haaretz decried the decision as thrusting Israel “down the slippery slope of apartheid.”
    • In 2011, the Israeli government approved a law allowing approximately 300 rural Israeli Jewish-majority towns to reject residents who do not meet a vague “social suitability” standard. Critics, including Human Rights Watch, slammed the move as an attempt to allow Jewish towns to keep Arabs and other non-Jews out.
    • The British Mandate-era Land [Acquisition for Public Purposes] Ordinance law allows the Israeli government to confiscate land for “public purposes.” Israel has used this law extensively, in conjunction with other laws such as the Land Acquisition Law and the Absentees’ Property Law, to confiscate Palestinian land in Israel.
    • The Law of Return allows Jews born anywhere in the world to immigrate to Israel and receive full citizenship automatically, while Israel denies the same right to Palestinians, who were born in and expelled from what became Israel in 1948, and their descendants.
    • In 2011, the Israeli government passed the so-called “Nakba law” which bans state funding for groups that commemorate the tragedy that befell Palestinians during the establishment of Israel in 1948, when approximately 750,000 Palestinian Arabs were ethnically cleansed to create a Jewish-majority state. (See here for more on the Nakba.)
    • In recent years, at least four bills were submitted to the Israeli legislature attempting to further entrench Israel’s identity as a Jewish state into law. In June 2013, a bill was introduced by Yariv Levin of Netanyahu’s Likud party and Ayelet Shaked of the Jewish Home party that would formalize Israel’s status as “the national home of the Jewish people,” specifying “that the right to national self-determination in Israel is reserved solely for Jews,” according to Haaretz newspaper.
145 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I wonder for how much longer Israel will call the shots.
Milikovsky with his “it’s not about 1967, the occupation doesn’t matter” thinks he’ll get another 20 years of doing nothing about peace while building houses for Jews in Yesha. We have to swallow Shoah business and “Jews wouldn’t do that” as if the field isn’t already saturated with Israeli insincerity and bad faith.

“You can watch video of the speech above (starting around 51:00)”

No thanks, I am about to have supper and would like to enjoy it without gagging.

WHY DO PALESTINIANS OPPOSE RECOGNIZING ISRAEL AS A JEWISH STATE?

#1 – No more so then establishing any peaceful relations with the State of Israel, which of course they would have to do anyway. Basically a red herring, the true reason…

#2 – The RoR as the Palestinians define it does not exist anywhere in law. And please do not bother replying with the fantasy that the Palestinians have no interest in the RoR for descendants. That is a tiresome lie. And BTW, UNGA 194 provides no rights.

#3 – Ummm, so what? They can have their own history in their own state. If we are talking about the Palestinians getting the state they supposedly want, then this is hardly a deal breaker.

“Even that would not be enough.” What is this, a distorted echo of “It would have been enough”? Is God involved in all this, or are these the works of politicians? Or madmen? Psychopaths?

But seriously now, if the refugees are not to be allowed to return to their homeland (now governed as pre-1967 Israel), then they (being as numerous as the Jewish Israelis and being an agricultural people as well) will need a much bigger state than WB&G&highway-between.

Dear Mr. Yahoo, would you consider a 50/50 division of land where you divide and the Palestinians choose? After all, Israel now controls 100% and claims it all as of right, thereby destroying any preferential Israeli claim to any particular land within it.

Oh? You do not agree to one-person one-unit-of-land? Oh, so this is not to be a fair deal, after all? Oh, so sad. Well then, 78%/22% (the green line solution, plus a highway between Gaza and West Bank)? And the Palestinians, alone, can use their own water. And Israel will take back the garbage, sewage, industrial waste, nuclear waste, et al., dumped since 1967 on Palestinian land? And the wreckage of the destroyed settlement buildings if the Palestinians ask for their destruction? Oh, but you want access or ownership to the Western Wall for Israel. Too?

Gosh, Mr. Yahoo, you sure do want a lot. Maybe the PLO should wait until Israel self-destructs or the EU squeezes Israel so hard that 50/50 would look good?

Gee, Mr. Yahoo, what say?

Is anyone really surprised?? This is nothing other than the old saying that there can never be “separate but equal” because the bigotry that insists on separation will insist on inequality. Zionists are Klansmen in kippas. Nothing more and nothing less.