Culture

In defense of Cornel West’s prophetic voice

This is part of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page.

I first met Cornel West almost thirty years ago when I was invited to share the podium with him at a New York venue on the subject of Israel and the Palestinians. I had just published Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation but more importantly the first Palestinian uprising was in full swing. Looking back those who invited us may have been looking toward a reinvigorated Black-Jewish dialogue by the infusion of the Israel-Palestine issue. I remember thinking that West was a bit soft on the issue; he let me lead while he followed along.

Back then, West was a little known academic and I remember driving around New York in his secondhand beat-up car. Soon after he exploded on the American academic and public intellectual scene in an almost unprecedented way. As an African American Christian, West was upfront about his justice-seeking agenda and, quite unexpectedly, the American media and university scene was ready for such a voice.

That was many years ago and when, just a few days ago, Michael Eric Dyson’s article excoriating West, his former mentor, colleague and friend, went viral, the internal African American debate about Black leadership and the broader public debate about liberal and radical politics heated up. The heat continues unabated.

Dyson’s article is long and personal. It has been hailed by some as analytical. It has been labeled by others as a diatribe. My sense is that Dyson is making a case for himself replacing West as the leading Black public intellectual in America. The title of Dyson’s article makes this clear: the once giant Cornel West has taken a great fall.

What is that fall about? Primarily Dyson calls West out for a self-reference that is epic, including among other things, West’s self-proclaimed prophetic mandate. Carrying that mandate most vociferously in West’s condemnation of President Obama as, among other things, a sell-out and a war criminal, Dyson protests loudly. Such a sweeping condemnation is unmerited, Dyson believes, and in its personal nature, exposes West’s overwhelming ambition. West calls out other Black figures, including Dyson himself, as favoring Obama because he is Black and lacking the moral fortitude to speak truth to power.

Though Israel-Palestine is a side issue in Dyson’s critique of West, it is important to note that both he and West are called to account in Stephen Salaita’s, Israel’s Dead Soul (pdf), in a scathing chapter, “Ethnonationalism as an Object of Multicultural Decorum.” Salaita’s critique of both is formidable and needs further exploration. At the same time though, it is important to note that West was one of the few public intellectuals with access to the national media to call out Israel’s war against Gaza in no uncertain terms. Recently West turned down a prestigious lecture at the University of Illinois in protest over Salaita’s dismissal.

In the continuing debate over American foreign policy and Israeli militarism, West, unlike Dyson, is clear and upfront. Though West sometimes seems out of his depth when the particular history of Israel-Palestine is discussed and has been accused of being overly protective of Jews in their empowered status, his use of the word “annihilation” in relation to Israel’s bombing of Gaza is again by far the strongest public commentary by a nationally known figure on the American scene.

I reconnected with West in 2011 when he gave a moving presentation on my own writing and teaching through the years at the national convention of university religious teachers. As with Salaita, he was there for me as I was being persecuted by the infamous Ken Starr who had become president of my university.

I saw then that West was a marked man, famous now, as he wasn’t when I first met him, with much more money, but clearly exhausted. He had become an icon to many, especially in progressive religious circles. In recent decades the religious community has come alive on many issues, including and especially Israel-Palestine.

Though Dyson’s predicted fall of Cornel West is clearly exaggerated, his penchant for disciplining West’s prophetic voice should be taken seriously. For with whatever deficiency West may have on the Middle East, whatever the personal overreach that marks many of our public figures, including Dyson himself, it is more than countered by the potential growth in his prophetic voice that still has many more miles to travel.

57 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

West was one of many who gave unquestioning and unflagging support to Barack Obama during his 2008 campaign. Any principles and ideals West possessed were set aside because West wanted a black President, no matter what the cost.

How come there were so many of us out there who could see through Obama’s faux-progressive veneer from the very beginning? That’s because we were color blind, preferring instead to look at what the man said and did rather than at his racial back ground.

Look where this has gotten us. We are currently engaged in more direct and proxy wars than at any other time in our history. We assassinate people all around the globe with robot drones. The wealth gap (which of course impacts minorities more than any other demographic) is the largest ever.

West’s current criticisms of this criminal administration are too little to late. An apology for his willful ignorance and lack of moral fortitude in supporting Obama in 2008 would go a lot further in bolstering my opinion of West. The truth was pretty obvious. Like so many alleged Progressives, West chose to ignore it.

West’s fall? Better, but equivalently, West’s defenestration.

There is a mechanism much used in America (and doubtless elsewhere) for social control. The controlling group “disciplines” people who speak out against the dogmas (or outright myths or lies) which are promoted by the controlling group (establishment).

We’ve seen a lot of “discipline” done by the self-declared Jewish leadership in its promotion of the (arguably un-Judaic or even anti-Judaic) dogma of Zionism and many of its myths and lies. We’ve seen academics denied tenure (Finkelstein, Salaita), lectures called off, demonstrations called off, etc. We’ve seen an entire MSM so cowed by the prospect of loss of job and loss of employability that they will not touch I/P honestly with a ten-foot pole.

The very same techniques are reported to have been used against those who challenge the USA’s official dogma (many say: myth/lie) explaining the terrorist events called “9/11”. See the last chapter “When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed” of “9/11 Ten Years Later” by David Ray Griffin. You do not have to agree with his viewpoint (namely, that the USA’s official story is incorrect and flatly contradicted by oceans of facts) to take note of the types of “discipline” used to silence critics.

Happily for 9/11 critics and I/P critics (Mondoweiss prominent among them) the USA still has “freedom of the press” even if the MSM has succumbed to what I am calling “discipline”.

Cornell West’s problem is that he is a true prophet, and prophets have always been despised. http://www.proseandphotos.com/used_&_abused_god's_prophets.htm

Another American prophet who has been “disciplined,” despised, and rejected because of the merciless truth of his words is Jeremiah Wright. His brilliant “America’s chickens coming home to roost” sermon shines way too bright a light on us; we couldn’t bear it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=208t80uceSg

Dyson’s New Republic article, in its preamble which praises West’s earlier work, tells us that West invited Foucault to sing the “insurrection of subjugated knowledges”. I don’t know how or what Foucault sang, but the invitation is not only couched in beautiful language! but is one that Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada, and many others have enthusiastically answered with regard to the subjugated knowledge of the Nakba as it was in 1948 and as it has since become.

And since Dyson begins with a quote, “Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned”, one wonders what is going on with Dyson here — I am still reading his very interesting article, but if he sees West as having fallen, perhaps there is some “hate” here (too?).

And haven’t we seen people rage against some of our own when they seem to contradict a well-loved doctrine (Finkelstein comes to mind as one raged-against because he seems to disparage BDS).

there are 2 highly recommended embedded videos in this text, one ( embedded in “strongest public commentary by a nationally known figure on the American scene”) we just added to the base so you can watch it below the text of the article.

the other is part one of west’s recent interview with dave letterman (embedded in “Black and lacking the moral fortitude to speak truth to power”)

for some reason i find it really hard to see these embeds, but i hope people watch both the excellent videos. here’s pt 1 of the letterman interview:

http://www.cbs.com/shows/late_show/video/53499481-C069-0573-301A-2491120A0A2C/dr-cornel-west-interview-part-1-david-letterman/