Trending Topics:

First the occupiers exploit a Palestinian spring. Then ‘The New York Times’ does

US Politics
on 19 Comments

The de facto hasbara alliance between the New York Times and the Israeli government just made a blunder, revealing complicity and ineptness on both their parts.

Yesterday we jumped on the staggering service that the New York Times had performed for the Israeli government, when the paper published a front-page article saying Israel has solved its water issues — without mentioning that much of that water is taken from Palestinians, whose use of water is highly restricted.

Well, it didn’t take long for the Israeli Embassy to tweet the image above. Mission accomplished! As we observed recently, the Times has evidently made an editorial decision to be a weapon for Israel in the hasbara wars — “hasbara” is Hebrew for propaganda.

And it didn’t take long for the New York Times to tweet an image for the story either: of young men in a pool.

Just one problem. That pool is not in Israel. It’s in the occupied West Bank, and it’s Palestinian. According to the Times’s own caption on the Uriel Sinai photo in its slideshow:

Palestinians swam in spring water at Ein Mabu’a in the West Bank. Israel, which shares an aquifer with the West Bank, says it provides the Palestinians with more water than it is obliged to under the existing peace accords. The Palestinians say it is not enough and too expensive. A new era of water generosity could help foster relations with the Palestinians and with Jordan.

And just one other problem. In a 2011 report on “Dispossession and Exploitation”, B’Tselem, the highly-respected Israeli human rights organization, describes the spring as an exploited Palestinian site, inside the occupied Ein Prat Nature Reserve.

In August 1967, shortly after its occupation of the West Bank, Israel began to generate income from the nature, tourist, and vacation sites in the northern Dead Sea area, and around Jericho and the Dead Sea shores. Israel does not presently deny Palestinians access to these sites, but few Palestinians visit them…

Since the 1970s, the [Ein Prat] reserve has been managed by the Nature and Parks Authority, which collects an entry fee of NIS 20 for an adult. In 2009, it had 73,340 visitors. The Authority plans to collect an additional fee for access to one of the reserve’s main springs, Ein Fuar (Ein Mabu’a), adjacent to the Allon settlement. The Separation Barrier is planned to be built inside the reserve, on the southern bank of the Fara (Prat) Stream. The plan is now frozen. If implemented, it would irrevocably damage the site’s landscape and ecology

Shouldn’t the New York Times be telling its readers about these stolen resources?

About James North

Other posts by .


Posted In:

19 Responses

  1. Boomer
    May 31, 2015, 12:00 pm

    The rule is, once Israel takes something, it is no longer Palestinian, so no problem.

    • Krauss
      May 31, 2015, 5:16 pm

      Israeli Theft = Israeli “innovation”. Haven’t you heard? /s

      But seriously, this newest hasbara push has backfired. A lot of people will be inadvertently educated on how Israel steals Palestinian water through this latest desperate (NYT-sponsored) PR push.

  2. Boomer
    May 31, 2015, 12:18 pm

    PS re James North on taking Palestinian water; I should have included this link to WaPo, in which Naftali Bennett explains it all.

    I suspect that the same rule explains how the Israeli reporter interviewed on NPR recently asserted that there are no roads from which Palestinians are excluded. I infer that she meant no roads in Palestinians territory. Roads to settlements from which Palestinians are excluded must evidently be considered part of Israel, and hence not available to Palestinians by definition.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/israels-naftali-bennett-i-dont-believe-in-giving-up-our-land/2015/05/29/0817d096-04f7-11e5-bc72-f3e16bf50bb6_story.html?hpid=z3

  3. amigo
    May 31, 2015, 12:23 pm

    Sewage treatment is the process of removing contaminants from wastewater, primarily from household sewage. It includes physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove these contaminants and produce environmentally safe treated wastewater (or treated effluent).

    Too bad Israel has not figured out how to remove the contaminate named “Ziocaine” , or maybe the water delivery system is how they feed ziocaine to the masses.

  4. Annie Robbins
    May 31, 2015, 12:54 pm

    “Israel is a world leader in recycling and reusing wastewater for agriculture”

    as the settlers dump their wastewater on palestinian villages flooding and contaminating their fields!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xoe2YJfRNA

    more here: http://mondoweiss.net/2014/02/without-telling-readers

    • Kay24
      May 31, 2015, 4:40 pm

      Excellent point Annie, but they are hoping that the facts will be overlooked, and the naive will buy it. They think that saying so, automatically becomes the truth.

    • DaBakr
      June 1, 2015, 12:17 pm

      @an
      if you actually read what Israeli technology in water sciences is about you would know that re-purposing waste-water and effluent into potable water is probably no better anywhere in the world then in Israel. Sometimes waste-water can be converted to crystal clear drinking water in less then 30mn depending on plant. It is using this tech to help areas in VERY serious need of water management like California’s inner valley and Indias northern fertile regions. And despite all the millions spent on anti-Zionist propaganda accusing the Israelis of ‘stealing’ water the Palestinians also benefit from waste-water treatment. Not saying water hasn’t been an issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict . Just saying the negatives portrayed against Israel are highly exaggerated. Even if the Palestinians gained access to all the water they feel entitled to-they would have to manage it with israeli technology or quickly deplete their ground source just like California has.

      • Cliff
        June 1, 2015, 5:22 pm

        You’re so pathetic Dabby.

        You suddenly become a water expert just to troll the Israel/Palestine conflict. LOL

  5. HarryLaw
    May 31, 2015, 1:14 pm

    According to International Law, the occupant [the Israeli military Commander] is not allowed to exploit the occupied territory for the benefit of the home economy. He must 1. look after the needs of the military whilst 2. Look to benefit the needs of the local protected population, not the settlers obviously, since according to article 4 of the Geneva Conventions they are not protected persons. (1) The Israeli high court of justice ruled that The Hague regulations prohibit the exploitation of resources of occupied territory for the economic needs of the occupying country. “The military commander may not weigh national, economic, or social interests of his country in so far as they have no ramifications on his security interest in the area, or on the interest of the local population. Even military needs are his (i.e. the military commander’s) needs and not national security needs in the broad sense. Territory held in belligerent occupation is not an open field for economic or other kinds of exploitation” [HCJ 393/92 Teachers Housing Cooperative V Commander of IDF forces. Honourable justice A Barak 1983].

    (2) The Israeli state attorney’s office relied on this principle in its response to the petition The Ma’ale Adumin Municipality filed to exempt it from paying for burying Palestinian waste in the Abu Dis waste-disposal site:

    It is absolutely clear that the powers specified in Article 55 too are subject to the fundamental principal involving the powers of the military commander in territory that is subject to belligerent occupation, as appears from Article 43 (Hague 1907) whereby the area is not an open field for economic exploitation. Therefore the entire authority of the military commander in the region is exercised for security interests or for civilian needs of the population living in the territory, and this includes also the authority under Article 55.

    • Boomer
      May 31, 2015, 2:13 pm

      HarryLaw: thanks for the review of international law. I imagine that the UN might have done something to encourage compliance with it by now, were it not for the many vetoes cast or threatened by the U.S., as well as other diplomatic efforts (some not so diplomatic) by the U.S. to provide Israel impunity.

  6. Boomer
    May 31, 2015, 2:11 pm
  7. Boomer
    May 31, 2015, 3:21 pm

    Israel isn’t alone, but I can’t think of a comparable offender that is actively supported, enabled, and defended by the U.S. to the same degree. And that continues because it isn’t only Jews in the US that turn a blind eye, unfortunately.
    (We do support many oppressive regimes, of course. Egypt and Saudi Arabia are two examples that come to mind. No doubt there are others too, but they don’t depend upon us to the same degree; our responsibility for what they do is less.)

  8. amigo
    May 31, 2015, 3:55 pm

    Israel is also the worlds number one recycler of untreated hasbara effluence.

  9. JWalters
    May 31, 2015, 5:51 pm

    The Israeli focus on their technical expertise is entirely irrelevant. Technical expertise has no relation whatsoever to moral expertise. An example that proves that point conclusively is the Nazis, who had highly advanced technical expertise, yet were morally blind. The Catholic Inquisition was another example, though with simpler technology. Both the Nazis and the Catholics also made claims of moral superiority.

    • CigarGod
      June 1, 2015, 8:43 am

      Those two groups…acted..on those claims of superiority…and we know the result. In the colonies and the new nation of the usa, they simply continued the practice. In regard to Israel, the immigrants took the existing/developing fascist ideology of the day…mixed it with Judaism…created Modern Zionism…and took it with them and imposed it on the native inhabitants in Palestine.

  10. eGuard
    June 1, 2015, 3:06 am

    NYT: [Israel] says [Israel] provides the Palestinians with more water than it is obliged.

    Wait wait. Why having to “provide” Palestinians with their own water in the first place?

    • Boo
      June 1, 2015, 9:55 am

      It’s the aqueous equivalent of “ceding” Palestinians’ occupied territories back to them.

  11. JWalters
    June 1, 2015, 5:53 pm
  12. iResistDe4iAm
    June 2, 2015, 11:32 am

    Israel is a recycled country, built on the rubble & ashes of another country, and the corpses, blood & tears of another people.

    Unfortunately for Israel, the Palestinians are native to the area, and will not allow the foreign occupiers to ghettoize, besiege, wall-in, ethnically-cleanse or bomb them forever.

Leave a Reply