Fascinating Barbara Walters shilled for racially-discriminatory organization

Two days ago Barbara Walters unveiled her list of the ten most fascinating people of 2015. The most fascinating of all was of course Caitlyn Jenner.

“If you found yourself unable to take your eyes of Caitlyn Jenner this year, you weren’t alone,” said Walters. “Through her own transformation, [she] transformed society this year and that, for us, makes her the most fascinating person of 2015.”

Well it turns out Barbara Walters is pretty fascinating herself. I recently learned that she was a keynote speaker for the Jewish National Fund gala in Ottawa in 2011. The Jewish National Fund is a quasi-governmental agency that buys land for Jews in Israel and Palestine.

This very week, Ayman Odeh, the Palestinian leader of the Joint List in Israel, refused to set foot in the Jewish Agency offices in New York in part because of its association with the JNF. As Mairav Zonszein said, Odeh’s decision was in line with American values:

His decision not to enter a New York office owned by an Israeli quasi-governmental organization that has — since its founding and to this day — promoted Jewish-only immigration and worked with the government and bodies like the Jewish National Fund to ensure contiguous Jewish-only territory throughout Israel is an act that sincerely and coherently reflects his positions and politics.

It also contains a lesson for the American Jewish establishment, which puts too much focus on open dialogue about Israel, and not enough on taking resolute action in the face of fundamental violations of its declared values.

Zonszein’s great editorial was in the Forward; and the editor, Jane Eisner, did something I’ve never seen in the Forward, wrote a piece big-footing her own contributor, Zonszein. Eisner reported on her own meeting with Odeh.

[H]he won’t accept Zionism that privileges Jewish ties to the land over Palestinian ties. And even though he is a member of the Israeli legislature, he and his Joint List colleagues won’t participate in the governmental work of the ministries of foreign affairs, security and absorption because of those agencies’ roles in foundational Zionism.

From there, it’s a direct but tenuous line to boycotting the Jewish Agency for its support of efforts that still today, Odeh contends, oppress the Arab minority.

I don’t think that’s a tenuous line. More than 1 million Israeli Palestinians believe that they are second-class citizens. You can’t argue them out of that belief. There are good reasons for their belief, including discriminatory land practices. Michael Bloomberg was shaped by the fact that when his family moved to Medford, Mass., they had to overcome anti-Semitic real estate covenants by having an Irish person buy their house for them. “It was a significant part of the family lore, it happened, everybody was clear that it happened,” his sister told the New York Times.

No American should belittle Ayman Odeh’s understanding about anti-Palestinian land restrictions. And Barbara Walters shouldn’t shill for a discriminatory agency.

 

21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Eisner was not altogether forthcoming when she wrote “refused to meet with a group of American Jewish leaders because the meeting was to be held in offices rented from the Jewish Agency for Israel”

he ‘refused’ to meet them in that location but he offered to meet them elsewhere. this is from her source link http://forward.com/news/326769/ayman-odeh-jewish-agency-controversy/#ixzz3un7DqN39 so i’m sure she knew that:

Odeh told the Forward that he had not known that the meeting would be held in a Jewish Agency space, and offered to meet instead at the offices of the Union of Reform Judaism, which are in the same building. Hoenlein said that the URJ’s conference room was unavailable, and that, even if it had been available, he would not have agreed to switch venues.

“Why would I succumb to that?” Hoenlein said.

heck, they could have gone to a restaurant around the corner. Odeh didn’t refuse to meet them — Hoenlein refused to change venues thereby, ultimately, tanking the talks.

From Wikipedia:

“Criticism[edit]
Upon Walters’ retirement, Salon.com wrote of “her craven obsession with power” and attacked her for her friendships with Henry Kissinger, Roy Cohn and Bashar al-Assad.[66]

S.J. Perelman once called Walters “the most insincere, brassy nitwit in the business.” [67]”

Nuff said.

This is a sidenote, but in reference to Phil’s continued observation how coverage of Adelson has obscured his core interest: Israel.

Well, Reuters for one doesn’t duck the issue:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-adelson-trump-idUSKBN0U10TA20151218

Also interesting that even if my guess is that Adelson prefers Rubio, he also wants to back a winner. In a sense, he and Trump share more similarities. Both are socially liberal casino moguls with a deep streak of militarism.

Adelson probably only hesitates to back Trump because he won’t be a puppet in the way Rubio clearly already is.

I could be wrong, but everything I sense about Trump is that Adelson would be stupid to back him. Opposition to Iraq war/ opposition to overthrow of Assad/refusal to commit to “united” Jerusalem under Israeli control/refusal to commit to W’s “commitments” to Ariel Sharon/ etc. Trump is polite/friendly with Adelson because they kind of speak the same mogul developer language, and Trump isn’t looking for a fight with the Israel lobby. But he is less likely to do the Lobby’s bidding than anyone running except, maybe, Sanders, IMHO.