I had a dream that I woke up and found out Ban Ki-moon had resigned from his duties as U.N. Secretary-General this morning. No one pressured him to do it; but he had said what needed to be said the day before at the U.N. Security Council meeting about the situation in the Middle East, primarily addressing Palestine and Israel in blatant terms. He spoke the words everyone knew to be true and there was nothing more for him to say in his capacity (in my dream).
Yesterday, the news of his speech was immediately picked up by Reuters, the Jerusalem Post and Haaretz. The Guardian followed shortly thereafter. But predictably, the US media ignored the news that the UN chief had said Israeli settlements were “provocative acts”, that it was “human nature” to react to occupation (which serves as a “potent incubator of hate and extremism”) and Palestinian frustration was “growing under the weight of a half century of occupation”. It was a bold statement but nothing we don’t already know. An “indisputable truth,” as Ban said.
However, the vast majority of coverage appeared after Netanyahu’s predictable, rehashed, worn out and hyperbolic response; and they led with that response: Netanyahu said Ban’s words “give a tail wind to terrorism.” Reuter’s lede, that Ban Ki-moon “slammed Israel’s settlement activities” was quickly overshadowed by CNN’s “The Israeli Prime Minister .. slammed the U.N. secretary general“.
Just a bunch of slamming back and forth. Which brings me back to my dream. What comes of Ban’s words if the UN doesn’t ever take a stand? “The weight of a half century of occupation” rests on the non action of the global community. What power does the UN have? And what power does Ban have? None. So this is why he resigned, to leave those words as his final words — in my dream.
I recently read a hysterical headline in Haaretz, “Senior IDF Officers Visit Palestinian Terrorists in Jail in Effort to Understand Their Motives“. The Israeli military’s central command wanted to understand the goals of the young people to understand the background behind their actions! What possible confusion could anyone have regarding Palestinian motive? As if anyone anywhere — any people — would not resist a brutal occupation and the theft of their land? It’s simply human nature.
Someone needs to slice through the proverbial Gordian Knot. Not stare at it in front of the shrine for decades, thinking it is destiny, unsolvable, some tourist destination chained intractably to the region. Ban lamented the “polarized public discourse across the spectrum in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory.” Why is that? Why do people buy into this false narrative that the very act of resistance, which is human nature, is at the root of incitement instead of the oppression bearing down on a people? It’s madness; they are not really a people, Palestine never existed, they have an irrational hatred of Jews, it’s all so complicated! It’s not complicated — let’s send in the military command and ask the prisoners why they resist? We have to get off this fantastical treadmill of imagining why Palestinians do what they do. We all know already and the act of knowing and speaking the truth is not incitement.
Cut the knot. The U.N. needs to take action. Ban’s term as Secretary-General ends December 31, 2016, days before Obama steps down. The EU is fed up. Make the year worth something.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s remarks to the Security Council on the Situation in the Middle East :
Sadly, 2016 has begun much like 2015 ended – with unacceptable levels of violence and a polarized public discourse across the spectrum in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory.
Stabbings, vehicle attacks, and shootings by Palestinians targeting Israeli civilians – all of which I condemn — and clashes between Palestinians and Israeli security forces, have continued to claim lives.
But security measures alone will not stop the violence. They cannot address the profound sense of alienation and despair driving some Palestinians – especially young people.
The full force of the law must be brought to bear on all those committing crimes – with a system of justice applied equally for Israelis and Palestinians alike.
Palestinian frustration is growing under the weight of a half century of occupation and the paralysis of the peace process.
Some have taken me to task for pointing out this indisputable truth.
Yet, as oppressed peoples have demonstrated throughout the ages, it is human nature to react to occupation, which often serves as a potent incubator of hate and extremism.
So-called facts on the ground in the occupied West Bank are steadily chipping away the viability of a Palestinian state and the ability of Palestinian people to live in dignity.
In an effort to overcome the political impasse, Quartet Envoys met Israeli and Palestinian officials on 17 December last year.
They reiterated the urgent need for significant steps, in line with previous agreements, to strengthen Palestinian institutions, security and economic prospects while addressing Israel’s security concerns.
Changing Israeli policies is central to advancing this goal, particularly in Israeli-controlled Area C, which comprises 61 percent of West Bank territory and is home to some 300,000 Palestinians.
Approvals of master plans for Palestinian sectors of Area C would allow for much needed growth in these areas and prevent demolitions.
Progress towards peace requires a freeze of Israel’s settlement enterprise.
Continued settlement activities are an affront to the Palestinian people and to the international community. They rightly raise fundamental questions about Israel’s commitment to a two-state solution.
I am deeply troubled by reports today that the Israeli Government has approved plans for over 150 new homes in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.
This is combined with its announcement last week declaring 370 acres in the West Bank, south of Jericho, as so-called “state land”. These provocative acts are bound to increase the growth of settler populations, further heighten tensions and undermine any prospects for a political road ahead.
I urge the Israeli Government not to use a recent decision by the Israeli High Court affirming a large tract of land south of Bethlehem as state land to advance settlement activities.
The demolitions of Palestinian homes in Area C of the occupied West Bank continue. So do the decades-long difficulties of Palestinians to obtain building permits.
The Bedouin community, in particular, is paying a heavy price. I reiterate the UN’s call for an immediate end to Israeli plans to forcibly transfer Bedouin communities currently living within the occupied Palestinian territory in the Jerusalem area.
At the same time, the humanitarian situation in Gaza remains perilous.
Eighteen months after the end of hostilities, conditions have not significantly improved. I condemn the continuing rocket fire into Israel from militant groups in Gaza.
Chronic security and governance challenges and funding shortages have slowed the pace of reconstruction. Much work remains to be done. Meanwhile, the people of Gaza face dire unemployment, water and electricity needs.
Meeting these concerns must be a top priority. However none of this can be accomplished without critical support from donors, the fulfilment of pledges from the Cairo Conference, as well as the full return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza.
I continue to strongly believe that conditions in Gaza pose a severe threat to long-term peace and security in the region.
Palestinians must also demonstrate commitment to addressing the divisions among Palestinians themselves.
I strongly urge the Palestinian factions to advance genuine Palestinian unity on the basis of democracy and the PLO principles.
Reconciliation is critical in order to reunite the West Bank and Gaza under a single legitimate Palestinian authority.
Healing Palestinian divisions is also critical so that Palestinians can instead focus their energies on establishing a stable state as part of a negotiated two-state solution.
Genuine unity will also improve the Palestinian Government’s ability to meet pressing economic problems, which are adding to the frustration and anger driving Palestinian violence.
The international community also has a responsibility – not least by responding generously to UNRWA’s recent emergency appeal of over $400 million to support vulnerable Palestinians.
And as we continue to uphold the right of Palestinians to self-determination, let us be equally firm that incitement has no place, and that questioning the right of Israel to exist cannot be tolerated.
…….
Some may say the current volatility across the region makes it too risky to seek peace. I say the greater peril is not seeking a solution to the Palestinian question.
Some say the two sides are entrenched in their respective positions. I say that we must not succumb to passivity, resignation or hopelessness that a comprehensive resolution of the conflict is not achievable.
A lasting agreement will require difficult compromises by both the Israeli and Palestinian leaders.
Yes — but what are the alternatives?
The continuing deadly wave of terror attacks and killings?
The possible financial collapse of the Palestinian Government?
Ever greater isolation of the Israeli Government?
A further deterioration of humanitarian conditions in Gaza and the agonizing build-up to another terrible war?
A hollowing of the moral foundation of both Israeli and Palestinian societies alike, a creeping moral blindness that ignores the suffering – and indeed the humanity — of one’s neighbour?
More unilateral acts by each side, intentionally designed to pre-empt negotiations and provoke the other side?
The parties must act – and act now — to prevent the two-state solution from slipping away forever.
[Upholding] and implementing this vision – two states living side-by-side in peace and security – offers the only means by which Israel could retain both its Jewish majority and democratic status.
As the wider Middle East continues to be gripped by a relentless wave of extremist terror, Israelis and Palestinians have an opportunity to restore hope to a region torn apart by intolerance and cruelty. I urge them to accept this historic challenge in the mutual interest of peace.
The support of regional partners in this pursuit is essential. The Arab Peace Initiative provides a valuable basis for broader support.
And finally, the whole international community must be ever more committed to actively help Palestinians and Israelis to rebuild trust and achieve an enduring peace before it is too late.
Thanks for this Annie.
Sadly, nothing will happen from USA or EU. Imagine, it took the EU years to deliberate labeling the products from the illegal colonies, then came out with a flimsy statement that was accompanied with a deluge of apologies and explanations that the EU is doing his to safe israel, the democratic and jewish state.
Sadly, Palestinians are realizing that land stolen by force can only be gained back by force.
The UN is only the sum of all its members, unfortunately some members are more equal than others, i.e, the five veto wielding powers, one of which, the US, consistently supports Israel no matter how many crimes Israel commits. I agree with Dr David Morrison [SADAKA] Ireland in this excellent article http://www.sadaka.ie/Articles/Briefings/BRIEFING-Two-state-solution-dead-without-sanctions-against-Israel.pdf “Without sanctions against Israel, the “two state solution” is dead unless serious and sustained economic sanctions are applied to Israel by the international community to force it to withdraw from the Occupied Palestinian Territories so that a Palestinian state can be established. It is a fantasy to believe that Israel can be persuaded to withdraw from these territories it occupies by negotiations alone, as the EU (and the Irish Government) appear to believe”.
The European Union is in a unique position to sanction Israel, being its biggest trading partner, and with Israel manifestly not complying with the Human rights terms of the Israel-European Union Association Agreement, the EU should act now instead of forever offering incentives for continuing bad behavior.
The tiny bit of respect I had left for the UN vanished when they let the abominable Saudis preside over the UNHRC.
“What possible confusion could anyone have regarding Palestinian motive? As if anyone anywhere — any people — would not resist a brutal occupation and the theft of their land? It’s simply human nature.”
Well, either Mr. IDF was just kidding or playing to the Israeli audience, or else he’d bought into the Zionist narrative to the point that he was genuinely perplexed, as who would say — what, they don’t love us? we, after all, who conduct out (brutal occupation) kindly administration more gently than any Arab country conduct’s its normal governance?
I wonder what they told him!
If we look to myth in history, the unravelling of Gordian’s Knot calls for a leader who is graced by the gods.
But in the absence of such a leader; I believe that the answer lies in the rule of law, because men are selfish by nature. Therefore there is a necessity for the rule of law. When the rule of law is not applied equally; when some think they are above the law, and others are not protected equally under law, then you have the excuse for Gordian’s Knot.
No one should be inferior or superior in the eyes of the law. This results in a fatal lack of trust. Gordian’s Knot is bred in this fatal lack of trust where there is imbalance in the application of the law. What’s needed to solve the conflict – restore the rule of law and equal adherence to the law and it starts with returning to legally-recognized ownership of land.
And Zionists have no right to say: I’ll return this to you if you guarantee us this. They must return what they stole regardless to re-establish trust, balance and equality under law, period. Then all parties must adhere to the rule of law from that point forward.
Zionism however is contrary to rule of law principles where fictitious Jewish entitlement is concerned and therein lies a huge part of the problem. Such superiority has no place under law. This zealotry will always be a source of conflict. Zionism cannot exist with the rule of law; there is no equality under Zionism. The end of Zionism will be the beginning of peace.