Team Trump adds insult to injury for the Palestinians

US Politics
on 7 Comments

It is tempting to interpret the announcement this week of a delay until the new year in US Vice President Mike Pence’s visit to the Middle East as the ultimate travel warning. It follows an eruption of regional unrest over Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

During protests last Friday, Israeli occupation forces killed four Palestinians and injured more than 250.

US officials, however, are not worried about Pence’s safety. In fact, predictions of a third Palestinian uprising in response to Trump’s Jerusalem declaration may be premature.

After decades of flagrant US bias towards Israel, Trump has confirmed to Palestinians only what they already knew. Some even grudgingly welcomed his candour. They hope he has finally silenced US claims to being an “honest broker” in an interminable “peace process” that has simply bought time for Israel to entrench the occupation.

The Palestinians’ anger towards Israel and the US is a slow-burning fuse. It will detonate at a moment of their choosing, not of Trump’s.

Rather, the hesitation in Washington over the vice-president’s visit reflects the messy new diplomatic reality that the White House has unleashed.

Pence was due here to smooth the path to Trump’s long-promised peace plan and to highlight the plight of Christians in the Middle East. The door has now been firmly shut in his face on both counts. Palestinian officials have declared a boycott of him, as have Christian leaders in Palestine and Egypt.

Instead of cancelling Pence’s visit or exploiting the extra breathing space to try to reverse the damage, the bull-headed Trump administration has indicated it is eager to break more of the china.

Denied access to Palestinian officials, his schedule will focus on Israel. Following a diplomatic precedent set by his boss in May, Pence is due to visit the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s occupied Old City and immediately below the Al Aqsa mosque plaza.

His visit, however, has been billed as “official”, not private. And it will be invested with far graver symbolism, given Trump’s designation of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

To add insult to injury, and in contravention of claims that Washington will not pre-determine the borders of a divided Jerusalem before peace talks, an unnamed senior US official gave Pence’s visit an even more troubling context. He noted that there was no scenario in which the US did not see the Western Wall ending up in Israel’s hands.

The US policy change on Jerusalem has been a hammer blow to the three main pillars supporting the cause of Palestinian statehood: the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the Arab states.

The biggest loser is Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Washington stripped him of his emperor’s clothes: he now heads a Palestinian government-in-waiting that is unlikely ever to be attached to a state, viable or otherwise.

The Arab states, which assumed they were the key to a much-touted “outside-in” strategy, creating a regional framework for peace, have been deprived of the single issue – Jerusalem – that matters most to them.

Egypt scrambled to help Abbas at the weekend by drafting a UN security resolution to rescind any change of status for Jerusalem. But an inevitable US veto made the move moot.

And Europe, which has played “good cop” to the bullying US one, has been exposed as complicit in its partner’s rogue behaviour.

Europe’s predicament is underscored by its peace-making rhetoric. It has long cried wolf, warning that a moment would soon arrive when a two-state solution was no longer feasible, when a temporary occupation morphed into permanent apartheid.

Now that the heart of a Palestinian state has been publicly devoured by the wolf, what will Europe and Abbas do?

The signs are that they will pretend nothing has changed – if only out of fear of what might fill the void if peace-making were exposed as a hollow charade.

But it is precisely the pretence of a peace process that has kept Palestinians chained to an illusion. The perpetuation of false hope about statehood does not benefit Palestinians; it preserves a calm that aids Israel.

That was why the White House accused Abbas of walking away from dialogue last week. But only a fool keeps on appealing to the better nature of a deaf thug.

The burden now falls on the PA, the Arab states and Europe to accept the new reality, and assert a policy independent of the US.

Some Palestinian leaders, like Hanan Ashrawi, already understand this. “Trump’s move is a new era,” she said last week. “There’s no going back.”

Palestinian goals and strategies must be reassessed. Nonetheless, the pressures for a return to the “peace” business as usual will be intense.

Ordinary Palestinians in Jerusalem may be the first to signal the new direction of struggle – one that recognises that a Palestinian state is dead and buried.

In recent years, growing numbers have started applying, as Israeli law entitles them to, for Israeli citizenship. Israel has twisted and turned to delay honouring its commitment, even as it calls Jerusalem its “united capital”.

Palestinians will have to shame Israel, the US and the watching world by adopting the tools of an anti-apartheid struggle – of non-violent resistance and civil disobedience – to gain equal rights in a single state.

At the moment, the undercurrents of Palestinian rage chiefly swirl below the surface. But they will rise in time, and the consequences of Trump’s deed will become all too apparent.

A version of this article first appeared in the National, Abu Dhabi.

About Jonathan Cook

Jonathan Cook won the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His new website is jonathan-cook.net.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

7 Responses

  1. Ossinev
    December 19, 2017, 10:48 am

    A measured and understated analysis.Particularly appropriate is the fact that the US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel`s capital has completely torpedoed the 2SS by stating that it is time to recognise this as a “reality”. It automatically ushers in in due course the overwhelming reality which is that there there will never be and there never was intended to be as far as the Israelis are concerned a Palestinian State west of the Jordan. Yes The US , certainly Abbas and his cronies and to a lesser extent the European Union and individual European states will let the farce of “peace negotiations leading to a two state settlement ” drag on for a little while longer but we are now in an end game situation. As Jonathan has pointed out the calls on the Palestinian street from the younger generation in particular will be for equal rights in this new state with Jerusalem as its capital .Well it`s not as if all those Zionists weren`t warned.

  2. Citizen
    December 19, 2017, 5:18 pm

    “Facts on the ground”–

  3. JosephA
    December 19, 2017, 9:40 pm

    The Native Palestinian People who were born in Jerusalem can apply for Israeli citizenship, but will the racist, apartheid colonialist occupying power grant them full citizenship?

    • Talkback
      December 24, 2017, 4:48 am

      ROFL. Israel’s international shyster Dershowitz and his perversion of truth and international law.

      Israel’s acceptance of 181 was only lip service. Ben Gurion’s proposal to the UN was to put all of Palestine under Jewish control. Guess what happened between 1947 until 1967 and only through war and expulsion? Dershowitz is a liar when he claims that Jordan’s occupation of the Westbank and East Jerusalem was “illegal” (allthough it was on behalf of the Palestinians against the Zionist onslaught) and Israel’s is not, but only “disputed” allthough belligerent. It may be “disputed” in the Kahane Continuum, but it isn’t in this universe. And Obama didn’t deem anything “illegal” that is not condemned by the UN and the International Court of Justice since 1967.

      So think twice before you mention this shyster again.

  4. JLewisDickerson
    December 25, 2017, 4:34 am

    RE: “To add insult to injury, and in contravention of claims that Washington will not pre-determine the borders of a divided Jerusalem before peace talks, an unnamed senior US official gave Pence’s visit an even more troubling context. He noted that there was no scenario in which the US did not see the Western Wall ending up in Israel’s hands.” ~ J Cook

    MY COMMENT: Similarly, when the State Dept. is asked about Israeli announcements of new construction in the settlements, they will say something like ‘we have said many times that such announcements by Israel do not help’. If a reporter persists they will say something like “everyone knows the settlement blocks will go to Israel in any final agreement, so new construction in them is not an obstacle to peace.”
    Since apparently the important issues have already been decided by the U.S and Israel, why don’t they just go ahead and implement their decisions without the ruse of “negotiations between the parties”. It’s as though the U.S. and Israel expect the Palestinians to sign their own ‘death warrants’.
    It’s clear that the “peace process” is little more than a ‘process of submission’ for the Palestinians. If they will just sign on the dotted line, they will be rewarded with some colored beads, a few trinkets and a bountiful supply of firewater (or, perhaps, an abundance of opioids) to dull their pain.
    Anyone who thinks the U.S. ‘acts in good faith’ is deluding themselves.

Leave a Reply